5.I. Hold a Public Hearing and consider an Ordinance Zoning Change from C - Commercial to M-PD - Mixed-Use Planned Development for an approximately 17-acre tract of land situated in the L. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 830 generally located on the north side of SH 114 between Northport Drive and Ashmore Lane. Northport Partners, LLC is the owner. JPI is the applicant. Case # PD-21-004

[5.I. Hold a Public Hearing and consider an Ordinance Zoning Change from C - Commercial to M-PD - Mixed-Use Planned Development for an approximately 17-acre tract of land situated in the L. Medlin Survey, Abstract No. 830 generally located on the north side of SH 114 between Northport Drive and Ashmore Lane. Northport Partners, LLC is the owner. JPI is the applicant. Case # PD-21-004]

IS TO WE'RE GONNA HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING TONIGHT ON THIS ONE. THIS IS AN ORDINANCE ZONING CHANGE FROM COMMERCIAL MPD FOR A TRACT OF LAND NORTH OF 1 14. BETWEEN NORTH PORT AND ASHMORE LANE. THIS IS FROM NORTHPORT PARTNERS WHO ARE HERE TONIGHT. J. P WHO IS ALSO HERE TONIGHT.

UM THIS IS A PRESENTATION THAT WAS GIVEN TO US A YEAR AGO AND WAS DENIED. AT THAT TIME, AND THEY'VE WAITED THEIR RESPECTIVE SIX MONTHS AND SOME AND, UH I UNDERSTAND THEY'VE GOT SOME CHANGES TO PROPOSE OR CHANGES FROM THAT ORIGINAL, UM, ITEM THAT WAS DENIED. I'D LIKE TO HEAR WHAT THOSE ARE IN CONCRETE TERMS TONIGHT, PLEASE. UM MR. ACCORDING TO DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING YOU'RE GOING TO PRESENT FIRST OR JUST MORE PROCEDURAL BECAUSE WE HAD THE P N Z SO CLOSE TO THIS. THE PNC DID, UH, RECOMMEND APPROVAL. IT WAS A 61 VOTE. UH WE HAVE SENT TO ALL THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS NOTICE. WE HAVE NOT RECEIVED ANY WRITTEN COMMENTS.

THERE IS A. THERE IS A LETTER OF SUPPORT, BUT IT'S NOT PART OF THE. THE 202 100 FT RADIUS, SO NO ONE'S NO ONE'S. PROTESTED THIS. WE HAVEN'T RECEIVED ANY LETTERS. THIS WAS PROPERLY POSTED IN THE PAPER ON THE WEBSITE, SO WE MET ALL THE PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS FOR YOU TO HEAR THIS. A PUBLIC HEARING IS NECESSARY AND WE HAVE A. PRESENTATION FROM THE APPLICANT AND WE NEED TO SWITCH IN THE COMPUTER A LITTLE BIT, BUT I'LL BE GLAD TO ANSWER ANY KIND OF PROCEDURAL QUESTIONS THAT WE'VE MET. MET ALL THOSE. AND BECAUSE I'M FILLING IN FOR NATHAN, I'M A LOT OF HELP DOING THAT. BUT. ANYWAY I WANTED TO ASSURE YOU THAT THOSE ALL HAVE BEEN DONE.

ALL RIGHT, COUNSELORS. SO DO YOU HAVE ANY PROCEDURAL QUESTIONS, WHICH IS ADMINISTRATIVE RELATED TO THE PROJECT? UM ANY ANY QUESTIONS FOR THE PROJECT ITSELF SHOULD

[00:35:03]

BE RESERVED FOR THE DEVELOPER. THEY NEED TO ANSWER FOR THAT ON OUR STAFF. OBVIOUSLY YES. OKAY.

ANYTHING FOR DREW. ONE TIME. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE SOMEONE TONIGHT? I WANTS TO START US OFF. HIGHLIGHT. WHAT'S UH, WHAT? YOU CHANGED? WHAT? YOU WHAT? YOU'RE BRINGING IT BACK.

THANK YOU, MARY. MY NAME IS TOMMY. MAN. MY ADDRESS IS 500 WINSTEAD BUILDING. I REPRESENT JP I TONIGHT WITH ME ARE SEVERAL FOLKS FROM JP. AS WELL AS MR BILL VAUGHN, WHO OWNS THE PROPERTY HAS BEEN WITH IT FOR QUITE SOME TIME. SO IF I GO THROUGH ANYTHING TOO QUICKLY, PLEASE FEEL FREE TO ASK QUESTIONS OF ME OR THE TEAM WHO IS PRESENT. BUT. I'LL TRY TO WORK THROUGH THIS, UH, EFFICIENTLY BUT GIVE YOU ENOUGH INFORMATION TO MAKE A GOOD DECISION. SO JUST A LITTLE BIT ABOUT JP. THERE'S THE LARGEST, UM, MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPER IN NORTH TEXAS, UH AND THEY SPECIALIZE IN LUXURY CLASS A MULTI FAMILY DEVELOPMENT.

THEY'RE FULLY INTEGRATED COMPANY. THEY ARE THEIR OWN GENERAL CONTRACTOR. AND SO THEY BUILD THESE PROJECTS AND ALL THESE IMAGES YOU'RE GOING TO SEE THAT I'LL GO THROUGH EFFICIENTLY OUR OTHER PROJECTS THAT THEY'VE BUILT. AROUND NORTH TEXAS. SO THESE ARE EXTERIORS. YOU CAN SEE THAT THEY WORK TO RESPOND TO THE PARTICULAR ENVIRONMENT IN WHICH THE PROJECT IS LOCATED IN DESIGNING THESE WITH HIGH QUALITY MATERIALS. INTERESTING FACADES. ENHANCED LANDSCAPING, ALL CERTAINLY THINGS THAT WE'VE BROUGHT TO THE DESIGN OF THIS PROJECT THAT WE'RE PRESENTING TO YOU TONIGHT AS WELL. THESE ARE INTERIORS. UM AND, YOU KNOW, OBVIOUSLY, THE GOAL HERE IS TO CREATE. A VERY APPEALING ATMOSPHERE FOR RESIDENTS WHO WANT TO LIVE HERE AND SO YOU SEE VERY HIGH IN FINISHES DOUBLE HEIGHT CEILINGS IN THESE COMMUNITY AREAS, BUT THESE ARE ALSO COMMUNITY AREAS. SO THESE ARE PLACES WHERE THE FOLKS WHO LIVE HERE. WILL GATHER AND NOT JUST A PLACE WHERE THEY PUT THEIR HEAD DOWN AT NIGHT, BUT IT BECOMES A COMMUNITY FOR THEM TO MEET AND HANG OUT WITH THEIR NEIGHBORS WORK. WIFI.

COMMERCIAL KITCHENS THAT, UH, CAN BE USED FOR COMMUNITY BREAKFAST, AND RESIDENTS CAN ALSO RENT TO HAVE THEIR OWN EVENTS. THERE ARE SOME INTERIORS OF THE UNITS THEMSELVES. YOU CAN SEE THE GRANITE AND COURTS COUNTERTOPS, ELEVATED FLOORING, STAINLESS STEEL APPLIANCES. IS A 10 FT CEILINGS IN THE UNITS THEMSELVES IN THESE ARE IN CONDITIONED CORRIDORS. SO THINK OF LIKE A FULL SERVICE HOTEL. NOT AT OLD WALK UP APARTMENT WHERE THE HALLS ARE TECHNICALLY OUTSIDE. THIS IS ALL INSIDE. LIKE A VERY HIGH END APARTMENT PROJECT. UM THESE ARE SOME OF THE OTHER AMENITIES. EVERY ONE OF THESE PROJECTS, TYPICALLY IN TEXAS HAS A RESORT STYLE POOL WHERE THE RESIDENTS CAN GATHER THERE. YOU SEE THE OUTDOOR KITCHEN FUNCTIONS, JIM. UH THAT COMMERCIAL KITCHEN THAT PEOPLE CAN RENT WHERE THEY ALSO HAVE COMMUNITY BREAKFAST AND THINGS LIKE THAT. THIS WILL PROBABLY DO A BETTER JOB THAN WHAT I JUST EXPLAINED. IT'S ABOUT A 92ND VIDEO OF A PROJECT THAT THEY JUST COMPLETED IN FARMERS BRANCH CALLED EAST BRANCH THAT HAS LEASED UP VERY EFFECTIVELY. IT'S A PRETTY GOOD ANALOG BECAUSE IT'S LOCATED RIGHT ON THE DALLAS NORTH TOLLWAY MAJOR HIGHWAY, AND SO I'LL LET IT ROLL FOR 90 SECONDS OR SO AND SPEAK FOR ITSELF.

YEAH.

AND YOU GOT MUSIC. SO UM, JUST TO GIVE YOU A RECENT PROJECT AND TALK ABOUT DEMOGRAPHICS AND HOW THESE COMMUNITIES ARE POSITIONED. THE JEFFERSON SILVER LAKE IS ONE THAT WAS COMPLETED IN GRAPEVINE. UH IT'S GOT 371 UNITS IN IT. UM THE ONE WE'RE PRESENTING TONIGHT HAS 360 THE AVERAGE AGE OF THE TENANT THEORISTS COME IN AT ABOUT 40. UH VERY, VERY FEW CHILDREN. AND THE PRIMARY REASON FOR THAT IS THAT THESE

[00:40:03]

ARE HIGHLY CONCENTRATED IN ONE BEDROOM UNITS ABOUT 65% AND LESS THAN 5% OF THE UNITS HAVE THREE BEDROOMS. SO THIS VERY MUCH CATERS TO A YOUNG ADULT OR AN EMPTY NESTER TYPE DEMOGRAPHIC. WITH RELATIVELY HIGH AND DISPOSABLE HOUSEHOLD INCOMES. THIS IS A LIFESTYLE CHOICE CHOICE FOR THESE FOLKS. MANY OF THEM COULD BUY A HOME, BUT THEY'RE READY FOR LESS MAINTENANCE OR THEY'RE STILL SAVING UP, MAYBE FOR THAT FIRST DOWN PAYMENT AND ARE LIKELY TO BUY A HOME IN THE COMMUNITY WHERE THEY CHOOSE TO RESIDE. UM SO WE'LL GET INTO MORE SPECIFICS ABOUT THIS PROJECT FIRST LOCATION, OBVIOUSLY, JUST WHERE IT IS WITHIN THE TOWN.

GENERALLY WE'VE BEEN WORKING WITH YOU ALL AND YOUR STUFF FOR A LONG TIME NOW. WE CERTAINLY APPRECIATE AND UNDERSTAND THE IMPORTANCE OF THE RURAL FEEL OF THE RESIDENTIAL CORE OF NORTH LAKE IN THE ONLY POINT TO MAKE HERE IS THIS SIDE IS VERY DIFFERENT. IN THAT SENSE. THIS ISN'T THAT. MUCH SOUTHERN TIP OF THE CITY THAT'S VERY DIFFERENT THAN THE REST OF THE RESIDENTIAL CORE. AND IT'S ALMOST AN INFILL SITE. AND WHEN I SAY THAT, I JUST MEAN THAT IT'S WHAT CAN HAPPEN WITH IT IS VERY MUCH DICTATED BY WHAT HAS ALREADY HAPPENED AROUND IT.

RIGHT. SO WE HAVE A LOT OF. KIND OF FLEX INDUSTRIAL OFFICE TYPE DEVELOPMENTS. THAT HAVE GONE IN ALL AROUND THIS SITE AND LEFT THIS LITTLE PIECE OF FRONTAGE HERE. THAT'S A LITTLE BIT AWKWARDLY SHAPED NOW AND TOUGHER TO COME UP WITH THE RIGHT USE FOR JUST TO GIVE YOU A LITTLE BIT OF A COMPARISON, RIGHT? HERE'S ROSES, WHICH IS A RELATIVELY DEEP RETAIL PAD, BECAUSE THEY HAVE A DRIVE THROUGH THAT GOES ALONG WITH THE RESTAURANT. AND EVEN THAT ONE'S ABOUT 215 FT. IN DEPTH. YOU CAN SEE WHERE THAT DIMENSION FALLS ON OUR SIDE. IT REALLY DOESN'T EVEN GET YOU MORE THAN ABOUT HALFWAY POINT BEING. YOU COULDN'T JUST FILL THIS SIDE UP WITH NOTHING BUT RETAIL. IT DOESN'T WORK. IT WOULDN'T FIT. THERE IS A PLACE FOR IT, AND WE'VE WORKED REALLY HARD TO ACCENTUATE IT IN THE PLAN THAT WE'RE PRESENTING TO YOU TONIGHT. SO THIS IS THE PLAN AND I'LL JUST GIVE YOU THE HIGHLIGHTS OF IT. AND THEN MAYOR WILL TALK ABOUT THE ONE THAT. THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY VOTED ON THIS BY THIS BODY, AND WHAT THE CHANGES WERE. BUT YOU'VE GOT THREE RESIDENTIAL BUILDINGS TO AT FOUR STORIES WANTED THREE STORIES. 360 DWELLING UNITS 925 SQUARE FOOT UNIT AVERAGE. RENTS RANGING FROM ABOUT 1600 TO $2300 A MONTH ALREADY TALKED ABOUT THE HIGH CONCENTRATION OF ONE BEDROOMS. BUT THE OTHER THING THIS PLAN. DOES A MUCH BETTER JOB OF THE PRE THAN THE PREVIOUS ONE IS REALLY FRAMING UP THE RETAIL OPPORTUNITY HERE TO CREATE A TRUE MIXED USE ENVIRONMENT AND PROJECTS. SO YOU SEE THE FOUR SITES. THEY'RE LOCATED TO THE EASTERN SIDE OF THE SITE, EACH LABELED RETAIL AND THEN THE INTEGRATED OPEN SPACES THAT PLAZA IN THAT COURTYARD WILL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND MAINTAINED, BUT THOSE WILL BE PUBLICLY ACCESSIBLE AND AMENITY AREAS FOR BOTH RESIDENTS AS WELL AS VISITORS TO THE OVERALL DEVELOPMENT. AND THE GOAL HERE IS TO SOMEWHAT SHIELD THOSE OPPORTUNITIES FROM THE ROUGHER EDGES OF THE PROJECT. FIRST OF ALL, WHILE WE STILL GET TO MAINTAIN THAT MATURE TREE BUFFER BETWEEN US AND THE COMMERCIAL, BUT REALLY.

CREATE WHAT WE THINK WILL BE FOUR GREAT SITES FOR SIT DOWN RESTAURANTS, PLACES FOR PEOPLE TO GATHER AND ENJOY. IF YOU JUST ZOOM THE LENS OUT A LITTLE BIT. YOU START TO SEE THIS PLAN IN THE BROADER CONTEXT OF WHAT'S ABOUT TO HAPPEN ALONG THIS STRETCH OF 1 14, WHICH IS GOING TO BE MOVED BELOW GRADE IN THE NEAR FUTURE BY TEXT DOT SO KIND OF THE OTHER BOOK END OF THIS IF YOU THINK OF IT THAT WAY ACROSS NORTH PORT. IS THE CONVENTION CENTER AND HOTEL THAT YOU ALL ARE FAMILIAR WITH THAT THAT THE CITY IS INVOLVED WITH THAT IT'S BEGINNING ITS DEVELOPMENT PROCESS. AND SO YOU SEE HOW THIS. LUXURY RESIDENTIAL IN THAT HOTEL CAN FRAME A REALLY GOOD RETAIL OPPORTUNITY AND CORE IN BETWEEN THEM AND HOPEFULLY LOTS OF GREAT DINING OPTIONS AND MAYBE SOME SOFT GOODS AND OTHER THINGS FOR RESIDENTS AND VISITORS TO ENJOY. THIS IS THE OLD PLAN. UH AND THIS IS THE ONE THAT WAS DENIED. AND YOU CAN SEE IT DOES HAVE A RETAIL COMPONENT AT THE WESTERN END, BUT IT'S REALLY NOT INTEGRATED.

THOSE WERE TO WHAT I WOULD CALL PAD SITES. THERE WEREN'T NECESSARILY DESIGNED IN A WAY TO INTEGRATE WITH THE APARTMENTS THEMSELVES. HAVE A SLIDE TOO. LITTLE TELL YOU THE SPECIFIC DIFFERENCES, BUT NOW WE ARE PROPOSING TO MAKE THIS MUCH MORE OF AN INTEGRATED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. WITH UPGRADED TO THESE CONDITIONED CORRIDOR BUILDINGS, THE HIGH END LUXURY FINISH OUT THAT I'VE TALKED ABOUT. UM WE DECREASED THE AMOUNT OF RESIDENTIAL FROM ABOUT 420 UNITS AT 360. WE INCREASED THE ACREAGE DEVOTED TO RETAIL BY 67% FROM THREE ACRES TO LITTLE MORE THAN FIVE ACRES. AND THEN JUST OVERALL, UPGRADED THE RESIDENTIAL ITSELF WITH ALL THOSE AMENITIES HAVE TALKED ABOUT, UH AND BE INTEGRATED, MIXED USE NATURE OF THE PLAN, SO WE THINK IT IS A MATERIALLY DIFFERENT AND, MORE IMPORTANTLY, MATERIALLY BETTER PLAN. THAN THE ONE THAT YOU CONSIDERED PREVIOUSLY. FROM AN ARCHITECTURAL STANDPOINT, YOU CAN SEE WHAT THE PLAN IS FOR THE PROJECT. THIS IS OBVIOUSLY RIGHT ALONG 1 14 AT THE CLOSEST

[00:45:05]

BUILDING FIRST YOU CAN SEE AT THE GROUND LEVEL THOSE DOUBLE HEIGHT COMMUNITY AREAS. YOU SAW SOME PICTURES OF OTHERS THAT HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED BY J. P. WE PULLED ALL THE BALCONIES OFF THE FRONT OF THIS INTENTIONALLY TO GIVE IT A MORE COMMERCIAL PRESENCE AND MAKE WE THINK IT EVEN BETTER ARCHITECTURAL STATEMENT FROM 1 14 AT THE FRONT OF THE PROJECT, AND YOU CAN SEE HOW THEY ENHANCED LANDSCAPING IS INTEGRATED INTO THAT ARCHITECTURE TO GIVE WHAT WE THINK IS A REALLY HIGH END. FEEL FOR IT. THIS GIVES YOU A SENSE OF THAT ENVIRONMENT WE CAN CREATE FOR THE RETAIL THAT I TALKED ABOUT. AND YOU SEE THE CORRIDOR. UH IN BETWEEN THE RESTAURANT SITES AND HOW THAT LINKS BACK TO THE CORRIDOR IN FRONT OF THE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. YOU CAN ALSO SEE HOW THAT FOUR STOREY RESIDENTIAL BUILDING HELPS TO CREATE A FEELING OF SECLUSION. IN AN ENVIRONMENT FOR THAT RETAIL AND THOSE RESTAURANTS TO ULTIMATELY SUCCEED IN THOSE PUBLIC PLACES. PLACE FOR THE KIDS TO RUN AROUND WHILE YOU'RE WAITING FOR THE FOOD. AND HAVING A DRINK, POSSIBLY ON THE PATIO. ANOTHER BIG THING THAT'S CHANGED SINCE THE LAST TIME WE PRESENTED BEFORE YOU THIS PROPERTY. I'M NOT GOING TO READ ALL THIS TO YOU. BUT THESE ARE ALL QUOTES FROM DIFFERENT PROPERTY OWNERS AND STAKEHOLDERS IN THE SURROUNDING DEVELOPMENT. WE'RE ACTUALLY IN A SET OF PRIVATE, RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS THAT REQUIRE AN AMENDMENT FOR US TO BE ABLE TO BUILD THIS PROJECT. SO WE SPENT A LOT OF TIME MEETING WITH THESE FOLKS, AND WE PRESENTED THEM THE SAME PLAN THAT WE'RE PRESENTING TO YOU TONIGHT. AND THEY VOTED TO SUPPORT IT AND TO ALLOW US TO PROCEED WITH THE USE IF WE'RE ABLE TO OBTAIN YOUR APPROVAL THIS EVENING, AND SO THIS IS JUST EVIDENCE OF THAT. UM AND OBVIOUSLY AN IMPORTANT FACT, WE THINK FOR YOU TO CONSIDER. WE ACTUALLY HAD SOME OPPOSITION FROM THOSE FOLKS. THE LAST TIME WE PRESENTED TO YOU, SO THAT HAS CHANGED, AND WE DID. WE PERFORMED A TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR THEM. AND WE MADE SOME SLIGHT ADJUSTMENTS TO THE SLIDE ACCESS. MAYBE I'LL GO BACK AND MENTION THAT REAL QUICKLY JUST ON THE ENDS PREVIOUSLY AT EACH END OF THE PROJECT, WE HAD CONNECTIONS. AT ASHMORE INN AT NORTH POINT, AND WE TOOK BOTH OF THOSE OFF AT THE REQUEST OF THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS TO ELIMINATE POTENTIAL TRAFFIC CONFLICTS WITH THEIR TENANTS AND USERS. SO THAT'S THE PLAN AT THE HIGH LEVEL. AND OBVIOUSLY IT TAXES FROM YOUR PREVIOUS PRESENTATION OR IMPORTANT, IT'S NOT THE ONLY THING THAT YOU CONSIDER IN MAKING A LAND USE DECISION LIKE THIS, BUT WHEN YOU PUT FORTH A GOOD USE. THEN WE THINK THE ECONOMICS SHOULD BEAR OUT THAT IT IS A GOOD USE, AND SO YOU CAN SEE THIS. JUST THE MULTI FAMILY COMPONENT OF THIS IS ABOUT A $77 MILLION HARD INVESTMENT. THAT DOESN'T EVEN INCLUDE THE RETAIL COMPONENT IN THE SALES TAX THAT IT WOULD WOULD GENERATE AND YOU CAN SEE WHAT THAT MEANS IN TERMS OF ANNUAL RESIDUES, BOTH TO THE TOWN AS WELL AS TO THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. AND WHEN YOU COUPLE THAT, WITH THE VERY SMALL NUMBER OF CHILDREN THAT WE ANTICIPATE IN A PROJECT LIKE THIS, YOU CAN SEE HOW IT HAS A VERY SUBSTANTIAL AND MEANINGFUL IMPACT FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND FOR THE TOWN. SO THE NEIGHBORHOOD OUTREACH I'VE MENTIONED IT. I THINK IT'S A CRITICAL COMPONENT IN ANY ZONING CASE. WHAT ARE THE FOLKS CLOSEST TO THE PROJECT? THINK IN THIS IN THIS INSTANCE WE ACTUALLY HAD TO GO THROUGH A FORMALIZED PROCESS WITH THEM AND GET THEIR VOTE. AND WE'VE DONE THAT, AND WE'VE GOT THEIR SUPPORT. SO IT CONCLUSION. UM WE WANT TO THANK YOUR STAFF FOR WORKING WITH US. THANK YOU ALL FOR ENDURING US FOR AS LONG AS IT'S TAKEN TO GET BACK HERE WITH THIS PLAN. WE THINK IT'S A MUCH BETTER PLAN. WE THINK IT'S A GOOD PLAN. YOU'RE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGREED IN A 61 VOTE ON TUESDAY. AND SO WE WOULD RESPECTFULLY REQUEST THAT YOU FOLLOW THAT RECOMMENDATION. I THINK MR VAUGHN MAY ADD A LITTLE BIT FROM HIS PERSPECTIVE AND OTHERWISE OUR WHOLE TEAM WILL BE HERE FOR ANY QUESTION. YOU HAVE. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, TOMMY. MY NAME IS BILL VAUGHN. I'M THE MANAGING PARTNER FOR NORTHPORT PARTNERS. AH, I BEGAN I TOLD THE. I TOLD THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION THE OTHER DAY, I TURNED 60 THIS SUMMER AND I START WORKING ON THIS PROJECT WHEN I WAS IN MY EARLY THIRTIES. SO, UH, AT THE TIME, WE COULD NOT HAVE FORESEEN THE THINGS THAT WE'RE GOING TO DEVELOP OUT AND THIS PARTICULAR AREA UH, LITERALLY, THERE WAS THE UM, CONCRETE PIPE COMPANY THAT WAS OUT THERE, RINKER PIPE, AND THEN THERE WAS A GAS STATION. AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF 35 1 14. THERE WAS NO.

TEXAS MOTOR SPEEDWAY. THERE WASN'T EVEN A VALERO. THERE WASN'T ANYTHING OUT OF THIS AREA. UH TEXAS MOTOR SPEEDWAY CAME A LITTLE LATER. UH, THE UM. THE RETAIL. UH PARK ACROSS THE STREET IS INCREDIBLE BUT, UH, I DON'T THINK ANYONE COULD HAVE FORESEEN THAT BACK IN THE DAY THERE WAS A REQUIREMENT THAT THE OUTLET MALLS HAD TO BE FURTHER OUT. SO IF YOU TAKE A

[00:50:03]

LOOK AT WHAT'S HAPPENED. IN HILLSBORO, TEXAS, OR EVEN UP IN GAINESVILLE. A LOT OF THOSE CENTERS ARE SITTING BACON NOW. SO THE WHOLE NATURE OF THE RETAIL REQUIREMENT FOR THIS AREA HAS CHANGED AS WELL. I KNOW THERE'S BEEN SOME TALK ABOUT NORTH LIKE WOULD LOVE TO HAVE A GROCERY STORE, AND I CERTAINLY UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT WE HAVE TRIED REPEATEDLY TO TRY TO GET GROCERS INTERESTED IN THIS SITE. AND THERE HAS BEEN NO INTEREST WHATSOEVER. UH 1 14 ACTUALLY GOES BELOW GRADE AT THIS POINT, SO YOU WOULDN'T EVEN BE ABLE TO SEE THE GROCERY STORE. SO THAT'S A CHECK AGAINST THIS, UH. THEY WANT TO BE AT AN INTERSECTION. WE'RE NOT AT AN INTERSECTION. THEY'RE LOOKING FOR A LARGER PAD. WE DON'T HAVE THAT THEY WANT TO BE SURROUNDED BY RESIDENTIAL. WE'RE SURROUNDED BY INDUSTRIAL, SO WE DON'T HAVE THE THINGS THAT THEY IT'S A VERY QUICK NOTE EVER GROCER THAT I'VE TAKEN OUT THERE TO LOOK AT THIS PARTICULAR PROPERTY, SO. WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT, IS TRYING TO CREATE SOMETHING WITH WHAT WE HAVE CONSIDERING THE GEOMETRY OF THE SITE AND WHAT'S IN PLACE, AND WHEN WE HAD THE CHANCE TO SIT DOWN WITH EVERY. PERSON WITHIN THE PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION OF NORTHPORT, UH COUNCILOR FAILED TO MENTION WE NOT ONLY RECEIVED APPROVAL. IT WAS UNANIMOUS APPROVAL. SO EVERYONE AROUND THIS REALLY LIKES THIS PLAN AND WANTS TO SEE THIS IN PLACE. SO UM. I JUST WANTED TO POINT THAT OUT. WE'VE BEEN TRYING AND WE CONTINUE TO TRY. I THINK ONCE WE DO THIS, IF YOU COULD ENVISION THIS FOUR STORY BUILDING BEING REALLY NICE KIND OF FRAMING UP THE SITE. AND THEN, OF COURSE, THE CITY IS PUTTING THEIR CONVENTION CENTER ON THE OPPOSITE END OF THE SITE, WITH THE ONLY MID RISE HOTEL IN TOWN AND THE ONLY FULL SERVICE HOTEL IN TOWN. SO THOSE ARE GOING TO KIND OF BE BOOKENDS FOR WHAT WE'RE DOING, AND WE'LL HAVE A FEW LITTLE POCKETS OF RETAIL IN THERE THAT I THINK ARE GOING TO CREATE FOR A REALLY NICE PROJECT. WHEN IT'S ALL SAID AND DONE CREATED A LOT OF ADDITIONAL TAX BASE.

PROVIDE SOME ADDITIONAL RETAIL. THAT'S NOT THE SAME KIND OF RETAIL AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER.

IT'S NOT GOING TO BE OUTLET MALL TYPE RETAIL IT COULD BE OTHER TYPES OF SMALLER RETAIL AS WELL AS WELL AS RESTAURANTS. THAT'S WHAT WOULD BE IN PLACE SO. THAT BEING SAID, UH I DON'T KNOW IF ANYONE HAS ANY FURTHER QUIT OR ANY QUESTIONS, BUT. DO YOU HAVE ANY MORE TO THE PRESENTATION THIS EVENING? IT'S JUST THE TWO OF YOU. I THINK THAT'S IT. THANK YOU. OKAY ALRIGHT COUNSELORS SHOULD WE HEAR FROM THE PUBLIC? BEFORE WE GET TO DISCUSSION OR YOU WANT TO START YOUR DISCUSSION FIRST. OKAY, REPUBLICANS. THAT'S GOT ONE ALL RIGHT, SO WE'LL GO TO THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 6 23 PM AND I'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING AND WE HAVE. MR MCGREGOR. I BELIEVE YOU'RE THE ONLY ONE WHO SIGNED UP SO FAR. IF ANYONE ELSE WANTS TO SPEAK, THEN PLEASE WAY THAT MEAN WHEN MR MCGREGOR IS DONE. 6 23 3 MINUTES, YOU'LL MCGREGOR 89 21, HIS FAMILY LANE. UM YOU KNOW ME, I LOVE PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO DO WHAT THEY WANT WITH THEIR PROPERTY. BUT. NORTH LAKE HAS A TON OF APARTMENTS AND APARTMENTS. TEND TO BE A BIGGER DRAIN ON CITY RESOURCES THAN JUST ABOUT ANY OTHER THING YOU CAN PUT IN THERE BECAUSE THERE'S SO MANY PEOPLE CRAMMED IN A SMALL AREA. YOU KNOW THE YOU'VE GOT A BUNCH OF CUSTOMERS. WHEREAS IF YOU PUT A. FOUR BUSINESSES IN THERE, YOU'D HAVE FOUR CUSTOMERS. YOU KNOW, THEY'RE TALKING ABOUT 360 UNITS THAT'S GOING TO BE 720 PEOPLE, PLUS. UM IT'S GONNA BE A LOT OF TRAFFIC. WE'VE ALREADY GOT TONS OF APARTMENTS DOWN IN THAT AREA, WHICH OPENED TILL AND THEY PROBABLY ARE STILL THE MAJORITY OF NORTH LAKES POPULATION. IS APARTMENTS. UM. THIS IS MUCH BETTER THAN THE LAST ONE THEY PRESENTED OFF. I'LL GIVE HIM THAT AND HAS MORE RETAIL IN IT.

THAT'S GOOD FOR NORTH LAKE. I'D LIKE TO SEE A STUDY OF THE AMOUNT OF TAX. THIS IS GOING TO BRING IN. THEY SHOWED THAT VERSUS WHAT ELSE MIGHT DO IN THERE. VERSUS. NORMAL COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL STRAIN ON THE TOWN AS FAR AS WHAT IT COSTS THAT MAKES SENSE.

THE, UM. JUST A BUDGET THING TO SEE HOW MUCH MORE OF THIS WOULD COST TO SEE IF IT WOULD REALLY BRING IN MORE TAX THAN A COMMERCIAL THING WOULD AND WE'RE NOT TALKING TO TOTAL YOU KNOW, THE TOTAL MINUS THE EXPENSE AND I THINK COMMERCIAL IS GOING TO BRING IN A LOT MORE MONEY. UM. AND I THINK. THAT'S REALLY ABOUT IT. EXCEPT FOR ONE THING THAT MIGHT CONCERN ALL OF YOU GUYS IS THAT'S A WHOLE BUNCH MORE CITIZENS TO CONTACT WHEN YOU'RE CAMPAIGNING. UH ANY OF THE COMMERCIAL STUFF THEY WOULDN'T EVEN LIVE HERE SO YOU WOULDN'T HAVE TO TALK TO THEM.

BUT. LIKE I SAID, I'M TORN BECAUSE I DO WANT PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO DO WHAT THEY WANT TO

[00:55:03]

WITH THE PROPERTY, BUT I DON'T WANT TO SUBSIDIZE IT AS A TAXPAYER, IF IT'S COSTING MORE THAN. THE REPORT SOMETHING ELSE THAT WOULD GO IN THERE. THANKS. ANYONE ELSE TONIGHT? ALRIGHT 6.

26 PM WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND OPEN FOR A COUNCIL DISCUSSION. I HAVE A FEW, UM.

BASIC ANALYSES FOR YOU RELATES TO MR MCGREGOR'S QUESTION. THEY HAD THE SAME QUESTION AS TO DOES THIS PROJECT ACTUALLY, WHAT DOES IT DO FROM AN ECONOMIC BASIS FOR THE TOWN AND WHAT'S THE ESTIMATED COSTS ON OUR SERVICES? AND SO I WENT THROUGH EACH OF OUR SERVICE OFFERINGS. AND THEN TOOK A LOOK AT WHAT THE CONTRIBUTION FACTOR IS FOR THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT, AND, UH, THIS IS WHAT I CAME UP WITH. SO THIS FROM A UTILITY STANDPOINT IS VERY POSITIVE. UM THIS ONE BECAUSE OF THE DISTANCE FACTOR TO OUR EXISTING WATER AND SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE.

UM THERE'S VERY LITTLE WE NEED TO DO TO TURN THIS SITE ON, SO IT'S VERY HELPFUL. THE FEES THAT COME IN ARE ESSENTIALLY JUST JUST PURE CASH. VERSUS A LOT OF PROJECTS. WE HAVE TO USE THAT TO ACTUALLY GET THE INFRASTRUCTURE OF THE PLACE. BECAUSE OF THE SIZE OF THESE UNITS, APARTMENTS ARE ACTUALLY ONE OF THE THINGS TO THE RECENT CHANGE IN RATES ARE ACTUALLY A NET CONTRIBUTOR TO THE UTILITY SYSTEM. UM BECAUSE WHAT HAPPENS IS THEY PAY A HIGH STARTING BASE FEE. WHICH WE ALL PAY. WHICH THEN BRINGS DOWN THE IRRIGATION FACTOR, WHICH IS THE HIGH WATER USE CUSTOMERS THAT START AT THE SINGLE FAMILY MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITIES AND GO UP TO THE LARGE ACREAGES. THAT'S WHERE MOST OF THE ECONOMIC COSTS OR WATER SYSTEM IS IN IRRIGATION. BECAUSE THEY DON'T USE ANY AND THEY USE VERY LITTLE WATER IN A STUDIO APARTMENT, EVEN UP TO A THREE BEDROOM. UM I'M EXPECTING THE ECONOMICS FOR UTILITY SYSTEM TO BE NET. POSITIVE. UM NOT. NOT DRAMATICALLY BY FACTORS OF ANYTHING, BUT I EXPECT IT TO BE SUBSTANTIALLY PROFITABLE FROM OUR UTILITY SYSTEMS STANDPOINT. FROM THE TRAFFIC STANDPOINT, THIS ONE'S FAIRLY GOOD. IT'S GATED SO WE DON'T PAY FOR ANY ROADS. WHICH IS GREAT. BECAUSE THERE'S NO ACCESS TO THE NORTH PORT. IT DOESN'T PUT THAT DIRECT STRAIN ON THOSE INTERCHANGES. AND SO THOSE CAN STAY AS THEY ARE, BASICALLY, SO THAT HELPS US AS WELL. UM, THE NET FACTOR FOR TRAFFIC. FROM A COST STANDPOINT, IT'S ALL BASICALLY ONTO THE TEXT DOT ROAD AND ONTO THE PROJECT. SO FROM A TRAFFIC IN A NOT ATTRACT STANDPOINT EXCUSE ME FROM A COST TO SERVE FROM A ROAD STANDPOINT, WE DO NOT. WE HAVE A NEGLIGIBLE CONTRIBUTION TO THAT. WHICH MEANS THAT. ANY CONTRIBUTION TO OUR GENERAL TAX COFFERS IS NET POSITIVE AS WELL. AND THAT. THE ONE FACTOR THAT COSTS US MONEY. THE ONLY SERVICE WE PROVIDE OUTSIDE OF OUR GENERAL, UM, CITY FUNDING FROM A, UH YOU KNOW, UTILITY BUILDING STANDPOINT, WHICH.

AGAIN AND STILL UTILITY FUND BUT FINANCE ADMINISTRATION STANDPOINT THAT'S NEGLIGIBLE IN TERMS OF EDITION, THE ONE PART THAT COSTS US IS CALLS AND SO WE DID TALK TO CHIEF. THE CHIEF DID MAKE SOME CALLS IN THE PAST. ON THIS TYPE OF PROJECT FOR THE PROJECTS THAT THEY HAD LISTED IN TERMS OF WHAT THEY'RE NOT CALL VOLUME WOULD BE THE CALL VOLUME FOR A GATED COMMUNITY LIKE THIS IS EXTREMELY LOW IN COMPARISON TO ANY OTHER PROJECT IN THE TOWN.

IN FACT, I JUST ASKED THE CHIEF FOR NUMBERS TONIGHT. OUR CALL VOLUME FOR THE LAST YEAR WAS 4134. I THINK IT WAS 4100 CALLS A YEAR. THE ESTIMATE I BELIEVE FROM LAST YEAR IN THIS PROJECT WAS 40 CALLS A YEAR, WHICH MAKES IT THE LEAST NUMBER OF CALLS PER CAPITA FOR ANY PROJECT IN THE TOWN WHATSOEVER. EXISTING RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL ALL INCLUSIVE. FROM A COST STANDPOINT, OUR COST FOR PUBLIC SAFETY IS A 2 TO $3 MILLION BUDGET THIS LAST YEAR FOR THOSE 4000 CALLS WHEN YOU BREAK THAT DOWN ON A PER CALL BASIS. MM IT PUTS THIS PROJECT SOMEWHERE IN THE $30,000 RANGE TO SERVE. AGAINST THE TAX BASE OF A QUARTER MILLION. SO IT'S MASSIVELY POSITIVE FROM A RI STANDPOINT. FROM A COMPETITIVE USE STANDPOINT, UM, ONE OF THE PRINCIPAL FACTORS AS A PROBLEM ON THIS SIDE OF THE FACT THAT FOR 25 YEARS WE HAVEN'T GOT ANYTHING ON THE SITE. UM RETAIL PROJECTS ARE NOT INTERESTED IN THIS SITE AT THIS POINT. IT DOESN'T HAVE THE RIGHT FACTORS. THE SOUTH SIDE IS GOING TO BE MUCH MORE ATTRACTIVE, WHICH IS WHERE WE'VE HAD CONVERSATIONS ON GROCER AND IN THE PAST. UM AND THAT'S WHERE WE EXPECT MOST OF OUR MAJOR COMMERCIAL. THE LARGE STORES TO COME FROM IN THE TOWN IS THE DESIGN WE HAVE IN THE SOUTH SIDE FOR THE THREE BOX STORES AND ALL THE PAD SITES. WE'RE SEEING THAT START TO COME IN IN FRONT OF THE RUBY. AND THAT'S THE PRINCIPAL FACTOR WITH THIS SITE IS THAT IT'S DEPTH. UM AND RETAILERS HAVE LOOKED AT. IT JUST SHOOK THEIR HEADS AND NO, IT'S NOT.

IT'S NOT VIABLE. WE DON'T WANT ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT. SO THE IDEA THAT IF WE IF WE JUST TOOK IT AND SAID, WELL HOW MUCH ROOM DO WE HAVE FOR HOW MANY UNITS COULD WE PUT IN THERE? YOU HAVE TO THINK ABOUT THE TYPE. IF WE WANT TO CHANGE THE TRAJECTORY OF THIS AREA, WHICH RIGHT NOW

[01:00:09]

IS A COMBINATION OF WORKFORCE HOUSING AND I 35 USES SO TRUCK STOP. CAR WASH FAST FOOD.

THAT'S THE NATURE OF THE CORRIDOR. IF WE WANT TO CHANGE THAT, WE NEED A DIFFERENT USE.

AND THE CAMBRIA WAS THE FIRST ATTEMPT AT ATTEMPTING TO REDESIGN THIS TOP PART OF 1, 14 AND FORCE A DIFFERENT FEEL FOR THE ENTRANCE TO NORTH LAKE DOWN THERE AND HOPEFULLY STOP THE USE IS COMING FROM I 35 THE FAST FOOD AND GAS STATION TYPE USE. FROM USING UP THE WHOLE THE WHOLE AREA. SO FROM A IT'S VERY DIFFICULT TO DO A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON WHAT COULD COME BECAUSE RIGHT NOW IT'S NOT VIABLE. SO RIGHT NOW, NOTHING IN THE FUTURE. HOW MANY USES COULD WE GET? WE'LL GET SOME. BUT I EXPECT THEM TO BE MORE WHAT WE'VE GOT TO CROSS 1 14, WHICH IS THE CONTINUATION OF THE FAST FOOD LINE. WHICH IS PROFITABLE FOR SURE. BUT THE BOXING OF FOUR UM POTENTIALLY HIGHER QUALITY, WHICH IS THE GOAL HERE IS TO DRIVE HIGHER QUALITY, SIT DOWN RESTAURANTS AND HIGHER QUALITY RETAIL AND COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY. AS I SAID, BOOKENDED BETWEEN THE CAMERA AND THIS PROJECT. UM FROM A RETAIL STANDPOINT. WHAT WE'VE HEARD ALL THE TIME IS IT HAS TO BE NEAR THE ROOFTOPS. YOU HAVE TO HAVE ROOFTOPS. THESE DAYS.

COMMERCIALS UNINTERESTED. ANYTHING THAT'S NOT NEAR. ROOFTOPS. AND SO THE FACTOR FOR ME IN THE LAST ROUND WAS SPECIFICALLY WAS CONCERNED ABOUT THE LACK OF COMMITMENT TO THE RETAIL PROJECT. AND I DIDN'T. I DIDN'T LIKE THAT. IT WAS JUST A CARVE OUT. IT WAS THE THIN PART OF THE SITE, AND IT REALLY DIDN'T. DRIVE THE FOCUS ON THE RETAIL. THIS ONE FLIPS IT AND MAKES THE RETAIL ALMOST THE PRINCIPAL COMPONENT WITH FOUR PAD SITES. UM I AM LOOKING FOR THAT STYLE THAT THEY'VE DESCRIBED HERE. I'M LOOKING FOR THOSE USES THOSE PATIO RESTAURANTS. AND NOTS SO THAT THEIR PATIOS ARE SITTING IN A PARKING LOT, WHICH IS KIND OF WHAT WE HAVE RIGHT NOW, LITTLE FURTHER TO THE WEST. SO THAT'S THE. THAT WAS MY ECONOMIC ANALYSIS ON IT. UM I DO NOT HAVE A COMPLETE A B COMPARISON BETWEEN. THE TOTAL ECONOMIC VALUE THIS PROJECT VERSUS THE OTHER, BUT I WILL SAY THAT AND I DON'T HAVE NUMBERS FOR WHAT THIS PARTICULAR CLIENTELE WILL DO TO OUR SALES TAX BASE, WHICH IS THE OTHER PART THAT. AND WHILE AN ADDITIONAL TWO HAD SITES FOR RESTAURANTS COULD DRIVE A FAIR AMOUNT OF REVENUE, WHAT DO THESE 360 PEOPLE 360 UNITS OF $155,000 AVERAGE INCOME, WHICH IS HIGHER THAN ANYTHING ELSE WE HAVE IN NORTH LAKE. WHAT COULD THEY DRIVE IN TERMS OF THEIR DEMAND FOR SERVICES EXPECT THEIR CONTRIBUTION AND DIRECT SALES TAX FROM THEM TO BE AS SUBSTANTIAL AS THEIR PROPERTY TAX. AND THEN THE RESTAURANTS THAT THEY BRING. I EXPECT TO BRING A HIGHER VALUE. THEN WHAT WOULD WHAT WOULD ELSE BE THERE? THAT'S MY ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF IT. THE ECONOMIC ANALYSIS IS POSITIVE, IN MY ESTIMATION. BUT IT'S NOT THE ONLY FACTOR AND I THINK THE REST OF THE COUNCIL'S GOT SOME THOUGHTS ON THAT. UM I DO AS WELL BUT I DON'T WANT TO DON'T WANT TO JUMP TO THE WHOLE LIST OF CONCERNS AND, UM POINTS ON THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. UM BUT I'VE GOT MY FRAMEWORK, BUT I'M SURE THE OTHERS WILL HIT MOST OF THOSE POINTS. I'M GOING TO STOP AND OPEN THE FLORIDA EVERYBODY ELSE SO THEY CAN TALK AT THIS POINT. YEAH YOU GUYS ACTUALLY DISAPPOINT ME A LITTLE BIT BECAUSE YOU MADE ME DISAPPOINTED MYSELF THAT I VOTED FOR LAST ONE, AND THIS IS SO MUCH BETTER. ALL RIGHT. I'M NO FAN OF DEVELOPMENT. I MEAN, IT'S NOT A BIG SECRET. BUT THIS IS AN INCREDIBLY POSITIVE PROJECT. UM. THE CHANGES. YOU MADE HER SUBSTANTIAL. I'D LIKE TO INCLUSION OF THE PAD SITES. MM I'M REALLY PROUD OF THE WORK YOU GUYS DID HERE AND THAT TAKES A LOT FOR ME TO SAY. YOU DON'T KNOW HOW MUCH IT TAKES ME TO SAY THAT SO. THANK YOU FOR THE EXCELLENT PRESENTATION. UM I LOVE THE FACT THAT IT'S NOT GOING TO IMPACT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. FROM A LOAD SIDE, BUT IT WILL IMPACT THEM ON A TAX REVENUE SIDE. AND I ALSO TALKED TO CHIEF AND A FEW OF OUR OFFICERS, AND THEY SAID THESE TYPES OF DEVELOPMENTS JUST DO NOT CAUSE ISSUES FOR THEM. CALL VOLUME IS EXTREMELY LOW. MOST I THINK MR MCGREGOR SAID 720 PEOPLE. MOST OF THESE WILL BE SINGLE FAMILY SINGLE. TENNIS.

ONE PERSON PER UNIT ON AVERAGE. UH I THINK LAST TIME YOU GUYS WERE HERE, HE SAID, TYPICALLY 1.2 PEOPLE PER UNIT. IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN. SO THERE'S ONLY THERE'S LESS THAN 5% OF THREE BEDROOMS AND THAT NUMBER AS WELL. SO THAT PUTS IT AT LIKE 15 UNITS THAT ARE THREE BEDROOMS. SO WE'RE NOT GOING TO SEE THAT HEAVY POPULATION LOAD INSIDE THESE BUILDINGS WHICH WILL MINIMIZE CONFLICT AND POLICE CALLS. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR YOUR PRESENTATION. DO YOU HAVE ANY POTENTIAL TENANTS IN LINE YET FOR THESE RETAIL AREAS. IF SO, WHAT TYPE? ARE

[01:05:02]

THEY? THERE'S NO OTHERWISE RELEASES ON HIM YET, UM, YOU KNOW REALLY, THIS NEEDS TO HAPPEN FIRST TO CREATE THE APPEAL FOR THOSE WHO THINK. CAN YOU TALK TO YOUR OTHER PROJECTS? SO YOU KNOW YOUR GREAT FIND PROJECTS YOUR EAST BRANCH PROJECT. WHAT HAVE YOU BROUGHT NEXT TO THOSE, AND I KNOW THIS WAS A QUESTION. WE ASKED LAST TIME AND WE GOT KIND OF A MURKY ANSWER. WHAT'S NEXT? WHAT HAS COME NEXT TO THOSE IN THE YEAR 23 AFTER THOSE PROJECTS HAVE BEEN BUILT? SURE. SO IN IN GRAPEVINE, SAME IDEA LEAD WITH THE LEAD WITH THE RESIDENTIAL CREATE THAT ENVIRONMENT. SINCE THEN, AN OFFICE BUILDING HAS BEEN BUILT.

UH THAT OFFICE BUILDING IS IN LISA. THE RETAIL PADS, REMAIN THE MULTI FAMILIES AND LEASE UP AS WELL. UM THE FEEDBACK WE'RE GETTING ON THOSE RESTAURANT PADS IS POSITIVE. THEY'RE SIMILAR TO THIS. WHERE. THEY CAN. THEY CAN WORK ALL DAY LONG AS FAST FOOD, BUT THEY'RE TRYING TO CREATE THAT ENVIRONMENT HOLDING OUT FOR THE HIGH QUALITY RESTAURANTS, SO THAT'S A STAGE IS STARTING TO SET. WEST LOVE IS ANOTHER COMMUNITY NEAR LOVE FIELD WHERE WE BUILT MULTI FAMILY IN THE BACK. WE WERE THE FIRST MOVER. TODAY THERE'S A TEXT ADELPHIA AND AUSTIN EATERY STARBUCKS HAVE OUTDOOR PATIOS. IT'S A GREAT ATMOSPHERE, AND IT WAS VERY SIMILAR TO THIS WHERE WHEN WE FIRST BUILT WE WERE IN LISA. THAT WAS VACANT. YOU HAD A NICE PAVED ROAD THAT WENT BACK TO IT. AND ONCE THAT LEAST UP THOSE BODIES CAME THAT RETAIL CAME AND, UH UNIQUE UNIQUE RESTAURANTS AS WELL THAT I THINK WERE THE DEVELOPER WAS PROUD OF SO THAT THAT'S BEEN OUR EXPERIENCE AND WHAT WE HEAR FROM THESE RETAILERS. CREATE THE ATMOSPHERE, GET THE POPULATION THERE AND, UH MUCH BETTER SUCCESS IN ATTRACTING THE HIGHER QUALITY RESTAURANTS. VISION I HAD FOR THIS WAS TO TRY TO UM, EXTEND THE TROPHY CLUB MODEL, WHICH THEY'VE DONE A VERY NICE JOB ALONG THEIR FRONTAGE ON 1 14 TAKING SOME RAW LAND. AND PIECING TOGETHER A SERIES OF, UM, NON CHAIN. UNIQUE EATERIES THAT ARE HIGHER CLASS COUPLED WITH OFFICE PARK AND THEN ALSO SOME EVEN SOME MULTI FAMILY, WHICH IS AMAZING FOR TROPHY CLUB, BUT THEY DID A VERY NICE JOB AND HOW THEY CONNECTED THESE PIECES, AND I WANT A CONNECTION BETWEEN THESE. UM THE WORST THING IN THE WORLD FOR ME WOULD BE YOU PUT MCDONALD'S IN FRONT OF THIS. UM I WANT TO SEE STRATEGIC COMPONENTS THAT FIT THE CALIBER OF PEOPLE THAT ARE GOING TO WANT TO LIVE HERE. BECAUSE OF IT'S NOT THERE. IT'S GOING TO DRIVE AWAY THE CALIBER OF PEOPLE WE WANT TO LIVE HERE. AND I'M NOT. I'M NOT TRYING TO BE ESTABLISHED HERE ABOUT THE ECONOMIC STRATA HERE. THAT'S NOT WHAT WE'RE TRYING TO FIGURE OUT HERE. BUT I DO BELIEVE IN HAVING A PART OF OUR MISSION IS A MULTI GENERATIONAL, MULTI ECONOMIC STRATA TOWN. WE HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF SOMETHING FOR EVERYBODY. AND RIGHT NOW THIS THIS PROJECT CANNOT BE WHAT WE CURRENTLY HAVE. TODAY. WE HAVE WORKFORCE HOUSING. WE HAVE THE RUBY. VERY NICE PROJECTS. THEY'RE STEPPING UP IN TERMS OF THEIR QUALITY AND CALIBER. THIS NEEDS TO GO FURTHER THAN THAT. AND SO FAR AS PROPOSED IT DOES. BUT IT MUST SUPPORT THE KIND OF BUSINESS CLIENTELE WE WANTED TO CAMBRIA. IT MUST SUPPORT THE KIND OF ECONOMIC STRATEGY WANT THE TYPE OF LIVING THAT'S GOING TO BE CONDUCIVE AND A COUPLE OF THOSE YOU MENTIONED OR OKAY. I MEAN, STARBUCKS IS OKAY AND THINGS LIKE THAT. IT'S FOR 1 14. THAT'S THAT'S PROBABLY WHAT WE CAN AIM FOR. COFFEE AND RESTAURANTS AND DINING. VARIOUS CALIBER IS GOOD. BUT THAT'S WHAT THIS PROJECT IS ABOUT. BECAUSE ON ITS FACE, MULTI FAMILIES, NOT WHAT WE'RE OUT, ATTRACTING. BUT I UNDERSTAND WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT THE INFILL SITE, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT THE USES HAVE BEEN DIFFICULT, AND I UNDERSTAND THAT THEY HAVE BEEN SLOW IN COMING OR MAYBE NOT EVEN COMING AT ALL ON THIS PARTICULAR SITE. SO THIS IS SUBSTANTIAL IMPROVEMENT, AS MR MANCINI SAID. BUT IT MUST DRIVE THE KIND OF CALIBER OF COMMERCIAL THAT WE'RE LOOKING FOR, BECAUSE THAT'S TOO MR MCGREGOR'S POINT. THAT IS THE ATTRACTION FOR US IS THE DRIVER OF COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY IN THE TOWN. THESE FOLKS WILL DRIVE IT AND THEY WILL ATTRACT THE RIGHT STUFF, BUT MAKE SURE. THAT THERE'S THAT'S THE DRIVER BILL, AND I KNOW THIS IS MORE ON YOU THAN YOU. WELL YOU HAVE OUR COMMITMENT ON THE QUALITY WE'VE BEEN AROUND FOR 35 YEARS AND TAKE PRIDE AND REPUTATION. AND DON'T GET THAT BY STANDING UP HERE SAYING ONE THING AND DOING ANOTHER. SO UM WELL, I DID HAVE A QUESTION BECAUSE OF THE, UH, COMPLETELY DIFFERENT TOPIC OF THIS, BUT. THIS PROPOSAL IN FRONT OF US IT IS, YOU KNOW, PROPOSES AN 80% MASONRY FRONTAGE. AND THIS DESIGN TO ME IS 60% GLASS AND STEEL. SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THIS ISN'T SUBSTANTIALLY DIFFERENT THAN YOUR INTENTION. BECAUSE THE PAPERWORK SAYS 80% YOU KNOW, MASONRY AND SUSPENSIONS PRODUCTS, WHICH I KNOW THAT INCLUDES THE NICHIA AND THE YOU KNOW, HARD, IMPORTANT THINGS. WE DON'T COUNT THE GLASS. OKAY, SO IT'S JUST A SOLID SURFACES.

OKAY? ARE SOME OF THE NON C THREE SURFACES. SO THIS ISN'T A FUND RENDERING. THIS IS THIS IS

[01:10:09]

INTENTIONAL HERE, AND THIS IS EXPENSIVE. THERE'S A LOT OF ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES ON THIS.

YOU'RE SURE THAT YOU CAN DELIVER THIS IN THIS MARKET? WITH ALL THE PRESSURES ON MATERIALS. YES, SIR. WE ARE. WE ARE TODAY. YES, SIR. VERY BUT I'M USING A LOT OF AIRTIME COUNSELORS BECAUSE I HAD A LOT OF QUESTIONS. UM I WANT TO GET THE REST OF YOU ON THE RECORD.

FOR WHAT YOUR WHAT DO YOU THINKING ABOUT THIS? WHERE YET? I'LL BE QUICK. UH, YOU'VE FORGOTTEN THE ANSWERS TO MOST QUESTIONS THAT I HAVE. BUT MOST OF MY QUESTIONS WERE ASKED TO CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF OUR TOWN. UH WHAT THEY THOUGHT ABOUT THE APARTMENT? THEY LIKE THE IDEA AS LONG AS IT'S DOWN ON 1 14. THEY LIKE THE IDEA THAT IT'S HIGH END. THEY LIKE THE IDEA THAT PEOPLE COMING TO A HIGH END. UH APARTMENT I MAY HAVE SAID A HOTEL APARTMENTS THAT IF THEY LEAVE, THEY'RE THEY'RE GOING TO WANT TO COME TO HIGH END HOW TOWN WHERE THEY CAN GET HIGH END HOUSING. WHICH WOULD CONTINUE THE UPWARD GROWTH OF OUR TOWN. UM THEY LIKE THE AND BELIEVE THAT A HIGH END. APARTMENT WILL BRING ABOUT RETAIL SIT DOWN RESTAURANTS THAT THEY'VE ALL BEEN PLEADING FOR, UM. AND TO GIVE BILL VON A LITTLE BIT OF CREDIT. UH PRETTY MUCH BELIEVED EVERYTHING HE TOLD ME ABOUT GETTING A HOTEL IN HERE WITHOUT THE ROOFTOPS AND. SO I THINK THAT, UH OUR DIGITAL GROCERY STORY. I'M SORRY. UM I HAVE TO CONFESS. I'M TAKING SOME DRUGS. UH, UH, THAT THAT WE WOULD HAVE. YOU HAVE TO HAVE THAT ROOFTOPS TO PROVIDE FOR A GROCERY STORE, AND YOU HAVE TO HAVE THE, UH PROPERTY TO INSTALL ONE SO I THINK WE'RE HITTING THE SPOTS THAT THE CITIZENS WANT. AND I'M HAPPY WITH THE EXPLANATIONS THAT WERE ALREADY GIVEN ABOUT THE, UH, REVENUE COMPARISON, SO I THINK IT'S A GOOD DEAL MYSELF. I HAVE A TINY POINT TO ADD THAT I MEANT TO ADD WELL, SPEAKING EARLIER. AND LEGAL AND EVERYBODY HATES ME FOR HIS STUFF. THERE'S ONLY ONE THING I'D LIKE SEEING THIS PIECE OF PAPER, AND I THINK IT WON'T BE A HARD CHALLENGE BECAUSE WE'RE A LITTLE BEHIND THE TIMES HERE, LAMP TYPES AND SHIELDING LED LIGHTS. FULLY SHIELDED SHOULD BE ADDED TO THIS DOCUMENT, AND I HOPE YOU WOULD CONCUR IF WE DECIDE TO VOTE ON THIS TONIGHT. AND IF THE COUNCIL DECIDES TO TAKE PLEASURE, AND THAT WOULD THAT BE A CHALLENGE FOR ANYBODY? OKAY YOU'D BE AMICABLE TO THAT RIGHT AND CHANGE. OKAY JUST WANNA MAKE SURE BECAUSE IT'S NOT IN WRITING FOR THE RECORD. YES, THANK YOU. WOULD YOU PULL UP THE SLIDE, PLEASE? UM THAT HAS THE LAY OUT AT THE SITE. JUST THE SITE PLAN BESIDE WITH THE 215 FT MEASUREMENT ON IT. YEP. YES, THAT'S THE YEAH.

BUTTON ADDITIONAL BUMPER THAT'S NOT INCLUDED IN THE TICKET DOING THERE AND WHAT IT SAYS AND I GOT YOU GO AHEAD. SORRY.

SO WELL IT JUST TO CLARIFY THE POINT OF THIS SLIDE IS NOT THAT WE CAN'T GET RETAIL. IT'S JUST THAT IT WILL NOT TAKE THE WHOLE SITE. AND SO WE THINK, GETTING FOUR GOOD RETAIL SITES AND WRAPPING IT WITH $77 MILLION INVESTMENT. IS A GOOD MOVE. OFTEN NEEDS TO BE POINTED OUT THAT YOU'RE COMPARING THAT TO ADD VALUE LAND RIGHT NOW, WHICH IS A RIDICULOUSLY LARGE GAP IN TERMS OF, UM, TAX REVENUE THAT WOULD COME TO THE TOWN. IF YOU IF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT THE

[01:15:01]

AMOUNT OF TAXES WE'RE GETTING FROM THAT PROPERTY THAT'S AG VALUED. THEN YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT IT. TOTALLY DIFFERENT ANIMAL. SURE THAT'S FAIR POINT. I MEAN AND SO YOU CAN JUST IGNORE THE CURRENT REVENUE SLIDE AND JUST JUST LOOK AT THE PROPOSED AND THAT'S FAIR. AND TO YOUR POINT IS YOUR NAME TOMMY OR TOMMY? TOMMY? TOMMY? YOU MADE THE COMMENT ABOUT US WANTING TO KEEP NORTH LIKE RURAL, BUT FROM THE TIME I'VE BEEN INVOLVED IN GOVERNMENT AND MY FAMILY'S BEEN AND GOT INVOLVED IN THIS, WE HAVE NOTED THAT THAT AREA DOWN THERE WAS NOT GOING TO BE RURAL THAT WAS ALWAYS SLATED FOR LIGHT INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL AND THAT SORT OF THING, SO IT'S NEVER BEEN. A WANT FROM ANYBODY THAT I KNOW OF ON COUNCIL THAT THAT BE RURAL DOWN THERE BECAUSE IT'S JUST NOT POSITION FOR THAT. IT'S GOT TWO MAJOR HIGHWAYS RUNNING THROUGH IT SO THAT FROM MY STANDPOINT, THAT WAS NEVER A COUNSELOR ISSUE.

THERE WERE A COUPLE OF MEMBERS OF THE P N Z COMMISSION THAT MADE THAT COMMENT. SO THAT MAY BE WHY THEY RESPONDED IN THAT WAY. SO THERE IS SOME CONFUSION. LET'S GET. I THINK WE AGREE.

THIS SITES NOT RURAL. YES. WE HAVE STRUGGLED COUNSELOR TO GET THE INTEREST IN THIS SITE. WE DID HAVE A GROCERY. IT TOOK SOME INTEREST ON THE SOUTH SIDE. UM BUT ONE OF THE ECONOMIC FACTORS THAT HAVE SINCE LEARNED ON GROCERIES AS FAR AS THE COMPONENTS THAT ARE NECESSARY. THINK BILL OUTLINED MOST OF THEM. ANOTHER ONE IS THAT GENERALLY SPEAKING GROCERIES OR DEMANDING A VERY, VERY CHEAP LEASE FOR LAND. WHICH MEANS THAT TO MAKE IT ECONOMICALLY VIABLE ON ANY PARTICULAR PROPERTY, YOU NEED A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF PROPERTY THAT HAS A TON OF PAD SITES ON IT ON A HARD CORNER SO THAT YOU CAN OFFSET THE LOSSES FROM WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO TO AND SENT THE GROCERY COME WITH THE REST OF THE REVENUE FROM THE PAD SITES.

SO IN ORDER TO MAKE A VIABLE CORNER OUT OF THIS, THERE'S NO ROOFTOPS. IT'S ON THE WRONG SIDE OF THE HIGHWAY. UM AND THE CORNERS THAT WE HAVE DESIGNED FOR BOX STORES. ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF 1 14 HAVE THE HARD CORNER WITH CHADWICK PARKWAY, WHICH WAS DOWN TO A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF RESIDENTIAL WAS 17 LAKES AND CHADWICK FARMS. UM, THAT'S. A SUBSTANTIALLY GOOD LOCATION FOR A MAJOR RETAIL CENTER FOR US. BUT AS YET EVEN THAT HASN'T MOVED YET. AND SO THE POINT BEING IS THAT THIS SITE IS OUR BASICALLY OUR WORST SIGHT FOR THE DEMAND. AT THIS POINT, WE ARE GETTING THE SLOW DEMAND IN FRONT OF THE RUBY STILL TRYING TO FINISH OUT THAT FIRST BUILDING AND THEN GET THE SECOND ONE STARTED BECAUSE THERE IS A SECOND ONE COMING.

BUT YOU CAN SEE HOW INCREMENTALLY SLOW IT'S BEEN GETTING THAT ONLINE. AND SIMILAR PERIOD NORTHWAY COMMONS. WHILE WE'RE GETTING TO 30 BUSINESSES UP HERE, IT'S TAKEN THE EQUIVALENT OF, YOU KNOW 10,000 ENTITLEMENTS AND HALF OF THOSE HOMES BEING BUILT BETWEEN KENYAN FALLS AND THE RIDGE. AT THIS POINT WITH THE YOU KNOW THE BUTTRESSED BY HARVESTING BEHIND US AND PECAN SQUARE JUST TO GET THESE BUSINESSES ONLINE. RETAIL IS EXTREMELY HARD TO GET. AT THIS POINT, AND THAT LOCATION BACK WITH INDUSTRIAL JUST DOESN'T HAVE IT FOR MUCH IN TERMS OF USES, AND SO IT IT WILL CERTAINLY COME AT SOME POINT. IT'S NOT GOING TO COME IN ANY SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR. NOT FOR A WHILE, SO WE'RE GOING TO MISS OUT FOR QUITE SOME TIME.

POTENTIALLY IN THE USES ARE GOING TO BE MORE INCLINED, ARE MORE ALONG THE LINES OF WHAT I WAS WORRIED ABOUT, WHICH IS THE USES THAT KIND OF SUBSTANTIATE THE 10 OF THE TRUCK STOPPED LIED. WHICH IS SOMETHING THAT I DESPERATELY WANT TO CHANGE FOR THAT CORNER. RETAIL IS A FUNCTION OF ECONOMIC. RETAIL? YES DOWN EVERYWHERE. IT'S NOT. IT IS EXCEPT LIKE FRIENDS.

WORDS BAD IN THE REST OF THE. BUT THAT'S THE POINT IS THAT THIS SITE IS KIND OF LOWER. I'M A DESIRABILITY FACTORS COMPARED TO 11 71, WHERE WE HAVE A STRANGER CORNER THAT WILL DEVELOP AND ALSO APPEAR AT THE NORTH I COMMONS. AND THEN EVEN THE RIDGES GOT SOME STUFF COMING ON ROBSON RANCH, UM, BUT THE CORNER THAT'S GOT THE MOST VALUE FOR US DOWN. THERE IS GOING TO BE OUR EXISTING PAD SITES ALONG THE FREEWAY. AND THEN ALSO NEXT TO THE RUBY TO THE WEST AND IN FRONT OF THE RUBY. THOSE ARE THE BEST OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE NEXT WAVE OF COMMERCIAL. DO WE HAVE ANY TEXT UP PLANS THAT WE COULD PULL UP QUICKLY SO WE CAN SEE WHAT THE EXIT RAMPS ARE RIGHT THERE. OR DO WE KNOW YOU HAVE THAT SIDE GUYS? IT'S I HAVE EXTRA SIZE. TWO. FELLOW GOES. ACTUAL TEXT DOT PLAN OVERLAY DONORS. YEAH, YOU CAN SEE THE TEXT OUT OVER LAID SOUTH OF THE CYCLE, AND THERE. THE FACT THAT THIS IS 1 14 AND. TENS OF THOUSANDS OF CARS TRAVEL ON THIS ROAD EVERY DAY. DO WE HAVE TRAFFIC COUNTS? THE WE DON'T. I DON'T. I DON'T HAVE A TRAFFIC COUNT ON WE DID A TRAFFIC STUDY WITHOUT TEXT DOT AND THERE WAS

[01:20:04]

VIRTUALLY THEY SAID THE TRAFFIC WAS VIRTUALLY UNCHANGED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF A NINE SECOND.

ADD TO ASHMORE. UM. IS WITH REGARD TO THE EXIT RAMP. WE ARE. OUT FARTHER DISTANCE, ACTUALLY THAN WHAT TEXT DOT WILL ACCEPT. TO THE EXIT RAMP. BUT THAT IS WHAT TEXT DOT HAS TOLD US THAT THEY WOULD DO WE ARE AT MERCY AT THE MERCY OF TEXT DOT WE'VE GOT TO DO WHAT THEY SAY. UM WHAT WE'VE WHAT I RATHER HAD THAT ENTRANCE BACK OVER TO THE EAST. ABSOLUTELY, I WOULD, BUT.

IF YOU'LL NOTICE, AND I THINK YOU JUST SAID I'M NOT SURE IF I UNDERSTAND YOU CORRECTLY, BUT YOU CAN SEE AND AS SORT OF SLIGHT, BUT THERE IS ACTUALLY, UH, DIESEL LANE DECELERATION LANE IN BOTH OF THOSE ENTRANCES. FOR THAT VERY REASON, BECAUSE THAT'S A GREAT POINT. DO YOU KNOW THE YOUR TIMELINE? YES AND IT'S KIND OF INTERESTING. THEY ARE BIDDING THIS JOB. I'VE BEEN TOLD COURSE I WAS TOLD DIFFERENT THINGS. THE LAST TIME I WAS HERE, BUT I'M JUST TELLING YOU WHAT THEY'RE TELLING ME. THEY'RE BIDDING THAT JOB IN 2023.

THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE COMPLETED WITH IT. 2024. WE WILL BE COMPLETED IN 2024. I HOPE AT THAT TIME. SO BASICALLY THE TRAFFIC COUNTS IN FRONT OF YOUR ACTUAL FACILITY WILL BE.

ACCESS TO STAGG PROPERTY, NOT RIGHT. 1 14 NUMBERS. THAT'S RIGHT. THAT'S RIGHT. BUT THE GOOD NEWS IS THAT THIS WILL BE FINISHED THAT RETAIL AREA THAT WE'RE REALLY FOCUSED ON. IS GOING TO BE SHOWCASE. VERY WELL. SO. AGAIN BACK TO THIS FINDING RETAILERS. TODAY THEY DO THEIR DUE DILIGENCE AND WERE AND THEY FIND OUT THAT THIS THING IS GOING TO BE UNDER CONSTRUCTION FOR THE NEXT TWO YEARS. THEY'RE NOT GOING TO DO A THING. THERE'S NOTHING WILL HAPPEN UNTIL THIS FREEWAY IS FINISHED. THE BEAUTIFUL PART IS THAT THIS? WE ALL TALK ABOUT THE SPEED AND EVERYTHING ELSE BEING 60 RIGHT NOW, WHEN THIS CONVERTS TO ACCESS WROTE ABOUT THE TIME OF YOUR COMPLETION IF THERE'S NO DELAYS IN TEXT THOUGHT. 45 MILES AN HOUR. THE CELLS MUCH BETTER. A LOT OF OUR CONCERNS FROM LAST SESSION THAT WE. HEARD THIS IS A MUCH BETTER SCENARIO FOR TRAFFIC AND SAFETY, BECAUSE LET'S PUT THIS WAY AFFAIRS, A SIX LANE HIGHWAY.

THE ACCESS ROAD WILL BE JUST THAT ACCESS. ONLY NOBODY'S GONNA BE JUST SUNDAY, DRIVING ON THE ACCESS ROADS. ANOTHER THING IT'S NOT SHOWN ON THIS MAP IS THERE'LL BE A HIGH SPEED.

UH INTERCHANGE FROM 1 14 TO 35 W SO PEOPLE WON'T BE GETTING OFF GETTING ON THE FRONT EDGE, GETTING BACK ON THE 35 W FRONTAGE TO GET TO 35 W NORTH. WE CAN GET YOU THE FORCE COME OUT, BUT OFF OF THE BAPTIST. THE LEFT IS A. HIGH SPEED. WE'RE INTERCHANGE RAMP THAT WILL TAKE ALL THAT TRAFFIC DIRECTLY. I KNOW THE CHILD DID THIS INTEREST OF YOUR NEIGHBORS, BUT I THINK IT'S RELATIVELY UNSAFE, NO MATTER THE SCENARIO, WHETHER IT'S PEOPLE DRIVING 60 ALONG THEIR 45 THAT YOU SHOULD HAVE AN ENTRANCE ON NORTH PORT AND ON ASHMORE. I THINK THAT MAKES THE WHOLE DEVELOPMENT SAFER SIMPLY BECAUSE YOUR RESIDENTS CAN TURN ON EITHER ONE OF THOSE STREETS AND HAVE. GREATLY DECELERATED AT THAT POINT AND TURN INTO YOUR DEVELOPMENT. MY PROBLEM WITH APARTMENTS IS THAT IT SPAWNS STORAGE FACILITIES EVERYWHERE.

THAT'S TO ME THAT IT'S JUST. FROM AN AESTHETIC STANDPOINT, IT'S A BLOT ON OUR LANDSCAPE TO SEE THESE STORAGE FACILITIES POP UP EVERYWHERE. UH OKAY. I'M I DON'T KNOW. I'M NOT SURE HOW TO RESPOND TO THAT. IS IT? THERE IS A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THAT MAP AND THIS MAP BECAUSE THAT HAS THIS IS WELL, THIS IS WHERE WE HAD THE OVERLAY. RIGHT? THIS IS OUR OLD SITE PLAN, OKAY? SLIGHTLY GOOD CATCH. THIS IS YOUR INTERIM FROM WHEN YOU MODIFIED AFTER THE DENIAL, BUT SHE DIDN'T BRING THIS ONE BACK TO US. YOU STARTED TO AND THEN PULLED IT TO TALK TO THE A CHOICE. OKAY? YOU'RE AT THE. THANKS. DIFFERENCES THAT ASHMORE SPORT.

WEST. DID YOU HAVE SOME MORE LOOK LIKE YOU GOT A BUNCH OF PAPER? OKAY? MARRIAGE COUNSELORS FURTHER DISCUSSION OR CONSIDERATION. I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THIS WITH THE ADDITION OF FULLY SHIELDED LED LIGHTING. ALRIGHT, EASIER. YOUR BUTTONS AND. ALL

[01:25:08]

RIGHT. THE MAYOR PRO TEM HAS MADE A MOTION TO APPROVE WITH THE MODIFICATIONS SPECIFIED I'VE SECOND IN TONIGHT SO COUNCILLORS OF THE VOTING IS OPEN. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE 42 AND ONE THIS EVENING. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. THANK YOU. SCREEN NETWORK. I'M NOT SEEING IT. CAN WE GO BACK? IT'S NEVER SHOWED IT UP HERE. CAN YOU READ IT FROM THE RECORD, PLEASE? DAYS WERE. NO. NO. STATE. AND WHAT IT'S BECAUSE IT'S SCREEN IS SHRUNK. HIS BUTTONS DON'T LINE UP WITH HIS TOUCH. ALL RIGHT, SO LET'S LET'S JUST LET'S JUST 44. LET'S LET'S LET'S ROLL. CALL THIS. SO DO YOU GUYS MIND IF WE ROLL? CALL OUR VOTES AND JUST VERBALLY PUT HIM ON THE RECORD? OKAY, UM, I'LL START WITH WEST CETERA. WEST. YEAH, YEAH, YEAH. NO.

YEAH, YEAH. NO NO. ALL RIGHT. SO WE HAVE 43 IS THE RECORD AND MAKE SURE THAT THE RECORD REFLECTS THAT PIECE. GOOD NIGHT, GENTLEMEN. THANK YOU. I'M MEDICINE. STUPID THING. NO, NO. YOU HAVE A MACHINE FROM A COMPANY THAT WON'T BE NAMED. I DON'T GET IN TROUBLE AGAIN.

WE'LL, UH WE'LL WORK ON THE APOLOGIZE FOR THAT. ALL RIGHT. I APPRECIATE EVERYBODY WAITING TONIGHT. I KNOW THAT TOOK SOME TIME. WE'LL TRY TO GET GET GOING HERE. HOPEFULLY ITS NEXT THREE ARE KIND OF RELATED TO THE SAME TOPIC. SO LET'S LET'S GET STARTED HERE. WE NEED TO

[5.J. Hold a Public Hearing and consider a Ordinance amending the 2016 Master Thoroughfare Plan at the intersection of Strader and Florance. The amendment would maintain the current offset T-intersection and remove the future conventional four-way intersection with the reserve S-curve from the plan.]

HOLD. WE HAVE A THREE STEP PROCESS TO CONSIDER THE BASICALLY THE FRISBEE DEVELOPMENT. CAN WE CALL IT. UM OR SUBDIVIDE AND DEVELOPMENT. WE NEED TO DO A MASTER THIRD FOR PLANNED ADJUSTMENT PRIOR TO CONSIDERING THE SUBDIVISION. AND THEN WE HAVE IN FRONT OF US DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND THEN WE HAVE ANOTHER PUBLIC HEARING RELATED TO THE OVERLAY FOR THE FOR THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. SO. WE'RE GONNA START WITH ITEM J. THIS IS THE PUBLIC HEARING AND AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN. UM P AND Z DID RECOMMEND THIS TO US FOR APPROVAL. UM AND MR CORN WALK US THROUGH THE CHANGES PROPOSED. YES THIS WAS APPROVED.

THIS PUBLISHED ITS UM WE'VE SENT NOTICES TO THE ADJOINING PROPERTY OWNERS. THERE WERE VERY FEW WE SEE RECEIVED NO COMMENTS. IT WILL GO TO ONE OF THE MAPS THERE. YES SO JUST DRILLING IN ON THIS AREA. THE ONLY CHANGE WAS TO THE CURRENT, UM. MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN HAS AN S CURVE. AND THE BOTTOM PORTION OF THAT AT THAT ESCORT CURVE HAS STARTED. THE TOP PORTION OF IT S CURVE HAS A UM. IS IN THE CURRENT PLAN WOULD HAVE THAT THIS AMENDMENT. THIS MAP AMENDMENT WOULD HAVE THE EXISTING THE CURRENT OR THE EXISTING. OFFSET INTERSECTION.

THE TWO TEAS, PART OF THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN. SO WHEN WE TALKED ABOUT THIS LAUGH LAST WHEN I BRIEFED YOU ON THIS WITHOUT THIS AMENDMENT. EVEN IF THERE WAS, UH THE WILLINGNESS OF THE COUNCIL TO DO 32 ACRE LOTS. THAT REMAINING S CURVE WOULD CUT THOSE LOTS OF EVEN IF THERE WAS A. FIVE BAKER TRACK THERE OR A SIX ACRE TRACK. THAT S CURVE WOULD, UH, DO THAT SO, TOO, IN ORDER TO CONSIDER THE ZONING UM THIS. THOROUGHFARE PLAN AMENDMENT. UH, NEEDS TO OCCUR. NOW. THE P N Z IS YOU'VE ASSIGNED AS THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE

[01:30:08]

THERE ARE THERE CURRENTLY LOOKING AT THE MESS THAT THOROUGHFARE PLAN, THEY WILL HAVE AN UPDATE IN, UM. DECEMBER OR JANUARY, SO. THIS AMENDMENT WILL NOT BE VERY COULD NOT MAY NOT BE VERY LONG LASTING BECAUSE IT COULD THEN BE UPDATED AGAIN IN THIS S CURVE COULD BE CONTINUED. BUT THIS IS A. UH AN AMENDMENT IN ORDER TO MAKE THE DEVELOPER AGREEMENT IN THE ZONING HAPPEN. SO I KNOW THAT'S VERY CONFUSING, BUT I'M BRIEF JOEL ON THIS LAST TIME AS WELL. GREAT COUNSELORS. WE HAVE TO DO A PUBLIC HEARING IN TONIGHT. DO YOU WANT TO HEAR FROM THE PUBLIC FIRST OR HAVE DISCUSSION FIRST? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MR CORNET. 71 PM. UM WE'VE GOT TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS TONIGHT AND RELATED TO THIS TOPIC. SO WHO WANTS TO TALK AT THIS ONE? JUST WAVE AT ME. PART MR FRISBY MAKING MCGREGOR. MR MCGREGOR, YOU'RE CLOSER TO THE PODIUM. GO AHEAD, OKAY? JOEL MCGREGOR, 89 21 EAST FAMILY LINE. UM I THINK MAKING THE TWO TEAS IS GREAT. I THINK THAT, UM. THE PROBLEM WITH IT, BEING BEING CHANGEABLE IN THE VERY NEAR FUTURE IS NOT GOOD. I THINK IF YOU'RE GOING TO APPROVE THIS, IT NEEDS TO HAVE SOME KIND OF A STIPULATION AND THAT THIS WILL CARRY OVER TO THE NEW PLAN. UM. GENERALLY I'M CONCERNED ABOUT ROGER'S PROPERTY. AND I KNOW RIGHT NOW, WITH STRAIGHTENING OUT THAT IS AND MAKING THE TEA OUT OF IT. IT WOULD. AT THE LAST MEETING YOU TALKED ABOUT GIVING HIM SOME OF HIS LAND BACK THAT WAS TAKEN FOR THE S AND I THINK THAT'S GREAT, AND THAT NEEDS TO BE DISCUSSED. AND BUT WHAT I'M AFRAID OF IS THAT THIS COULD GET APPROVED. IN THIS DEVELOPMENT OF THESE HOUSES GETS APPROVED. AND THEN. IN TWO WEEKS OR A MONTH OR WHATEVER IT ALL CHANGES, AND THEY END UP TAKING A BIG CHUNK OF ROGERS PROPERTY BECAUSE YOU'VE APPROVED THIS DEVELOPMENT NOW YOU CAN'T TAKE PART OF IT. AND I'M NOT SAYING TAKE IT RIGHT NOW. I'M TALKING ABOUT IN THE PLAN TO BE TAKEN IN THE FUTURE OR WHATEVER AND. I KNOW. DREW HATES MY TAKEN TERM, BUT, UM. ANYWAY THAT'S MY CONCERN. I LIKE THE TWO TEAS LIKE IT IS NOW AND I'D LIKE. TO BE ABLE TO FIGURE OUT SOME WAY TO MAKE SURE THAT CARRIES FORWARD AND DOESN'T GET CHANGED. THANKS. COUNCIL HAS THAT PREROGATIVE AND THE MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN COMES UP TO CONSIDER THAT RECOMMENDATION. MR FRISBY, YOU WANT TO SPEAK AT THIS POINT? THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. UM I JUST WANT TO KNOW THAT LET YOU ON ALL THAT DREW APPROACH ME ON THIS ON THE, UH NEW THIRD FOOT PLAN, AN AMENDMENT AND, UH, BASICALLY, WE MET AGREED WITH ALL THE STIPULATIONS. UM AND, UH. ALLOWED HIM TO, UH, FOR ME BASICALLY TO DONATE THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO EXPAND THE ROAD AS HE WISHED OR AS CITY NORTH ANGUISH. THANK YOU, MR FRISBY. SO ANYONE ELSE I WANT TO SPEAK TONIGHT ON THIS TOPIC THAT ME. ALL RIGHT. SEVEN AND FOUR. P.M. WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. AND I APPRECIATE BOTH COMMENTS TONIGHT. UM AND, UH, I'LL OPEN THIS BY SAYING. THE PROPOSAL LAST TIME AROUND. I DENIED IT VOTED AGAINST THE PROPOSAL. AND THAT WAS PRINCIPALLY BECAUSE OF THE ABSENCE OF THIS DECISION, WHICH WE'RE CONSIDERING NOW, WHICH HAS TO COME BEFORE IN MY MIND. WE'RE NOT DOING THE PUBLIC OF FAVOR. UM AND PRESERVING THOROUGHFARES AND DOING OUR RESPONSIBILITIES TO THE TOWN AS A WHOLE WITHOUT CONSIDERING THIS FIRST BEFORE WE CONSIDER THE OTHER. AND IT'S NOT SO MUCH THAT I HAVE REALLY A PROBLEM WITH THE PROPOSAL. I HAVE A PROBLEM WITH THE SEQUENCE OF THE PROPOSAL. AND SO THAT'S WHY THIS IS. I'M PLEASED TO SEE THIS IN THIS SEQUENCE THIS EVENING. IS IMPORTANT FOR US TO CONSIDER THE IMPLICATIONS OF THOROUGHFARE IN TRAFFIC BEFORE WE START CREATING, UM, NIGHTMARE IN TRAFFIC IN THE FUTURE. NOW. I HAVE ONE THOUGHT FOR THE COUNCIL RELATED TO THIS. I SUPPORT THE T JUNCTIONS AT THIS POINT. THE REASON I SUPPORT THE T JUNCTIONS IS BECAUSE I DO BELIEVE THE LAST MINISTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN OVERSTATED THE NEED FOR ROADWAYS IN THIS AREA. UM I DO BELIEVE THERE'S GOING TO BE A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC ON FLORENCE. ROBES AND RANCH IS GOING TO BE CONNECTING UP TO THAT DIRECTION SOON, AND THAT'S GOING TO PUT A COUPLE 100 HOMES THAT ARE GONNA BE CLOSER TO THIS ENTRANCE ON FLORENCE. THEN THEY WILL BE THE FRONT ENTRANCE ON ROBSON. AND SO I EXPECT THEM PEOPLE TO USE THE BACK ENTRANCE TO GET IN AND OUT OF THEIR COMMUNITY TO GET TO ROBSON. UM I DO EXPECT SOME OF THOSE FOLKS TO GO NORTH TO GO WEST EVENTUALLY ON STRAIGHTER. TO 1 56. THERE'S A LOT OF FOLKS IN ROOMS IN THE HEAD WEST AND

[01:35:04]

THEY'RE CONSTANTLY TELLING US ABOUT THE NEED TO FIX TRAITOR. SO I EXPECT THEM TO USE THIS CORNER. BUT WHAT I DON'T EXPECT THEM TO DO IS THE HEAD SOUTH NECESSARILY VERY OFTEN AS.

BECAUSE THEY'RE NOT NUMBER ONE. THEY'RE 55 PLUS COMMUNITY. AND NUMBER TWO. THEY'RE NOT IN THE SD. AND SO FOR THOSE TWO REASONS, THIS THOROUGHFARE TO ME IS ALL ABOUT PRESERVING THE ACCESS LINE FROM THE SOUTHERN PART OF THE TOWN PAST THE HIGH SCHOOL. AND IN THE COMPLEX IT'S GOING TO BE BUILT AND THE TRAFFIC WAY THAT WE'RE GONNA NEED FOR NORTH SOUTH TRAFFIC WITHOUT HAVING TO GO TO I 35 OR 1 56. BUT IN THIS SECTION, I DO BELIEVE THAT WE MAY HAVE OVERSTATED IN THE PAST THE NEED FOR FOUR LANE ROAD GOING NORTH AND SOUTH IN AN AREA THAT THIS COUNCIL HAS MADE ABUNDANTLY CLEAR. UM HAS NO INTENTION OF PUTTING THAT KIND OF DENSITY UP THERE THAT WOULD REQUIRE FOUR LANE ROAD. AND THEN WE'VE GOT A LOT OF DEVELOPMENT COMING ON FOUGHT, BUT THAT ROAD IS SLATED TO BE A TWO LANE. SO I DON'T I DON'T SEE THE NEED TO PRESERVE A FOUR LANE. S CURVE. AND SO WHILE IT DOES CREATE SOME. YOU KNOW IT'S A LITTLE BIT OUT OF ORDER WITH DOING THE FULL PLAN. UM I APPRECIATE THE FACT THAT WE'VE TAKEN THE TIME TO CONSIDER AN AMENDMENT FIRST, WITHOUT THE FULL STUDY. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE TO HAVE HARD NUMBERS TO LOOK AT THIS AREA AND SAY, IS IT REALLY GOING TO NEED A FOUR LANE ROAD AND NUMBER TWO? I DO NOT WANT THIS COUNCIL TO HAVE TO CONSIDER PAYING FOR A FOUR LANE ROAD, WHICH IS EXORBITANTLY EXPENSIVE AND THE ROADS WERE BUILDING RIGHT NOW ARE COSTING US A FORTUNE. END OF FOUR LANE EXPANSION IN THIS SPACE, AND ALL THE WAY THROUGH THE REST OF THE TOWN IS SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENT THAT IS A DECADE PLUS AWAY FROM CONSIDERATION.

AND MAYBE MORE AND AGAIN, IT'S BASED ON THE DEMAND AND I JUST DON'T SEE THE DEMAND IF THIS COUNCIL STICKS TO OUR CURRENT COMP PLAN. OR AT LEAST SOMETHING CLOSE TO IT FOR RURAL PRESIDENT PRESERVATION AREA. UM. YOU KNOW, WE ACTUALLY HAVE SEVERAL OF THE LANDHOLDERS HERE AND IN PREVIOUS COUNCILS, AND THEY'VE SET A PLAN IN MOTION THAT PRESERVES THIS AREA FOR A LARGER ESTATES. YOU DON'T NEED A FOUR LANE ROAD CUTTING THROUGH LARGER ESTATES. I APPRECIATE THE PRESERVATION OF THE RIGHT OF WAY THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH STARDUST. I DON'T THINK WE SHOULD DO SOMETHING DIFFERENT. I THINK THAT WOULD BE UNFAIR TO STARDUST OWNERS WHEN THAT WAS BUILT. I THINK THE SAME AMOUNT OF RIGHT AWAY THAT WAS SECURED AT THAT TIME IS APPROPRIATE FOR CONSIDERATION. NEGOTIATION I THINK THE SAME KIND OF SIDEWALKS AND THE SAME PLAN CONSISTENCY MATTERS TO ME. NOT AS INTERESTED IN THE DEPTH OF THE PROPERTY. I'M INTERESTED IN THE. THE WIDTH OF THE PROPERTY ALONG FLORENCE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE PROPERTIES TO THE NORTH. AND SO THIS IS I MEAN, GETTING AHEAD OF MYSELF A LITTLE BIT, BUT FROM A T JUNCTION STANDPOINT. I THINK THIS COUNCIL IS CAPABLE OF ASSESSING WHAT THEY THINK THE TRAFFIC WILL BE IN THIS AREA AND RECOGNIZING FOR OR AGAINST THE T JUNCTIONS WILL BE SUFFICIENT. FOR ANY FORESEEABLE FUTURE. AND SO I DON'T. I DON'T WANT US TO GET IN THE WAY OF. YOU KNOW THIS PARTICULAR SUBDIVISION THINK IT MAKES SENSE WITH THAT CORNER, AND SO I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE COUNCIL APPROVED THIS. I'VE GOT A LITTLE AHEAD OF MYSELF. I APOLOGIZE. UM SO A LITTLE MORE THAN I INTENDED TO AT THIS MOMENT, BUT COUNCIL FLOOR IS YOURS. WHAT WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY IN REGARD TO THIS QUESTION.

THAT I GUESS I GOT TO HOLD IT TO SPEAK. UM. SOMETHING I DREW MENTIONED. STRUCK ME THE WRONG WAY, AND I THINK JOHN MACGREGOR PICKED UP ON IT. THE FACT THAT WE'RE CONSIDERING. THIS THOROUGHFARE PLAN FIRST. IN ORDER TO APPROVE A REZONING REQUEST. AND THE FACT THAT THIS THOROUGHFARE PLAN. THERE. WE VOTE ON TONIGHT. CAN POSSIBLY CHANGE AGAIN. WHICH MEANS SOMEONE'S PROPERTY IS GOING TO BE IMPACTED. THE. THE FACT THAT THERE WILL BE THREE POSSIBLE HOMES HERE. IF THE ROAD DOES CHANGE, THEY'LL GET A FREE PASS. SOMEBODY ELSE'S PROPERTY WILL BE IMPACTED, AND THAT'S COUNCIL MEMBER SESSIONS PROPERTY. UH HUH. THE OTHER THING I BROUGHT UP LAST TIME. WE'RE. REMOVING FURTHER AND FURTHER WEST NOW WITH REZONING RURAL RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. THEY'RE SUPPOSED TO BE A BUFFER FROM THE HIGH DENSITY STUFF AS WE GO FURTHER WEST. TO MAINTAIN HIS RURAL ATMOSPHERE, AND THIS CONSTANT REZONING IS.

BOTHERSOME TO ME AND EFFECT THAT. THE NZ CAN POSSIBLY CHANGES THOROUGHFARE PLAN AGAIN. LET'S BE HONEST. WHAT'S I THINK SO FAR? I HAVE NOT SEEN P N Z TURNED ANYTHING DOWN, YET THEY SEEM TO BE A RUBBER STAMP. SO THE FACT THAT WE'RE. POSSIBLY VOTING ON A STORE FOR AIRPLANE FIRST IN ORDER TO REZONE THE FRISBEE PROPERTY. TO ME. IT FEELS LIKE WE'RE JUST

[01:40:06]

SPINNING OUR WHEELS ON THIS TO BEGIN WITH. I MEAN, UNLESS I MISCONSTRUED WHAT? DREW SAID.

WE HAVE TO APPROVE THIS. TO APPROVE THE REZONING. BUT THIS CAN REVERT BACK. TO WHAT IT IS NOW. YES BUT ONLY BY OUR HAND WITH EVEN APPROVES THE NEXT THOROUGHFARE PLAN. IT'S STILL UP TO VOTE THEY'RE GOING TO IF WE SAY HEY, THIS IS A T. IT GOES TO THEM. THEY SAY WE WANTED AN S. IT COMES TO US WHEN WE GO. NO, IT'S A T. IT'S OUR FINAL WORD WELL, THAT'S GOING TO HAPPEN IN THE NEXT TWO MONTHS. YES WE'LL HAVE EITHER. DECEMBER JANUARY. THE. PANSY WILL MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO COUNSEL. IT'S COUNCILS ULTIMATE DECISION. WE WANT THAT TO BE A T. IT'S TOTALLY GOING TO BE A T. WELL AGAIN. MY OTHER CONCERN IS THE FACT THAT WE KEEP REZONING RURAL RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES TO SMALLER LOTS AND. I THINK RIGHT NOW WE HAVE ENOUGH DENSITY GOING WITH STARDUST. YOU HAVE. YOU DON'T THINK THIS MATCHES WHAT'S HAPPENING RIGHT THERE AT THAT EXACT CORNER AND THOSE EXACT LOTS THAT IT'S GOING TO TOUCH? THAT'S THAT'S NOT MY POINT. MY POINT IS WE KEEP DOWNSIZING. PROPERTIES. THAT'S THAT'S WHAT I HAVE AN ISSUE WITH. MA'AM. MAY I NOTE THAT EVELYN ROAD WOULD SOMEDAY CUT ACROSS SOMEONE'S PROPERTY? SOME OF THAT WOULD BE DANNY SIMPSON. TELL THEM UP. SURE, WHO ELSE IS THAT WOULD BE HIS HE AGREED THAT HE'D WANT THAT DONE. IS THAT ON THERE? REMEMBER THOSE ARE COLLECTORS AND IN THE NEW MAP, WE'RE GOING TO HAVE THOSE OFF. THOSE ARE REMINDERS TO DEVELOPERS. IF THEY DEVELOP A LARGE TRACK OF LAND, THEY'RE GOING TO NEED AN INTERNAL.

STREET TO HANDLE THAT TRAFFIC SO. THE KIND BOULEVARD AND PECAN SQUARE ELM STREET ON PECAN SQUARE OR COLLECTORS. UM AND IT'S JUST TO REMIND WE'RE GOING TO REMOVE THOSE AND PUT THAT IN NARRATIVE BECAUSE IT IS. IT CAN BE CONFUSING. THERE'S. IF THERE'S A PASTURE THERE, THERE'S ABSOLUTELY NO NEED FOR THAT ROAD TO BE THERE. IF IT'S GOING TO BE A MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY AND SUBDIVIDED WITH A CERTAIN LEVEL OF TRAFFIC. THEN IT'S GOING TO REQUIRE SOME TYPE OF INTERNAL COLLECTOR. A COLLECTOR IS NOT ON YOUR MASTER THIRD HER PLAN. IT IS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR IMPACT FEE REIMBURSEMENTS. UM, IT IS. IS MORE A PLANNING TOOL. FOR THAT, BUT WE'VE GONE OVER THAT BEFORE IN THE FUTURE MAP THAT WE'RE PUTTING FORWARD WILL JUST EXPLAIN THAT IN NARRATIVE, AND WE'LL HAVE ALL THE COLLECTORS TAKEN OFF THE MAP. DREW, WOULD YOU PLEASE PULL UP AN IMAGE OF THIS RIGHT HERE? DO WE HAVE THAT IN OUR SLIDE DECK. IT'S IN THE COUNCIL PACKET. YEAH, THAT WAS THE LATE REQUEST FROM ONE OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS. UM BUT, UM OKAY? UP HERE. EVERYTHING IN BLUE BABY BLUE. IS IT TOWN OF NORTH LAKE INCORPORATED? EVERYTHING IN BROWN. IS THE EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION WHICH WE HAVE NO CONTROL OVER ZONING IN THOSE AREAS WHAT WE'RE SEEING RIGHT NOW. IS A DEVELOPMENT ON FLORENCE ROAD.

THAT IS IN THE EXTRA TERRITORIAL JURISDICTION THAT IS REPORTED TO BRING ENORMOUS AMOUNTS OF TRAFFIC, SO I WOULD RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE THAT FLORENCE IS NOT GOING TO BE WELL TRAVELED IN THE FUTURE. I BELIEVE THAT IT WILL BE. I MEAN, WE'VE GOT A SPORTS FACILITY GOING IN ON THE EAST SIDE OF FLORENCE ROAD NEAR FM 407. THEM. I HAVE NEIGHBORS IN THE HIGHLANDS AND A BUNCH OF DIFFERENT. DEVELOPMENTS THAT USE FLORENCE ROAD. BECAUSE FM FOUR SEVENS GETTING MAJOR CONGESTION ON IT. DUE TO THE TRAFFIC AND. EVERYTHING FROM HARVEST AND PECAN SQUARE IN THE HIGH DENSITY DEVELOPMENTS. UM I THINK WITH THE FACT THAT FLORENCE IS GOING TO RUN SOUTH ALL THE WAY TO 11 71. YOU'RE GOING TO SEE A LOT OF TRAFFIC ON FLORENCE ROAD. MISS HARMON, ARE YOU CLEAR THAT I'M REFERRING TO THE CONTEXT OF THIS PARTICULAR INTERCHANGE? NOT THE ENTIRELY OF BUT YOU TALKED ABOUT THE FOUR LANE DIVIDED THAT YOU SAID THAT WE DON'T THINK BEFORE SEVEN TO THE HIGH SCHOOL IS ABSOLUTELY GOING TO NEED FOUR LANES. BUT WHEN YOU TRAVEL UP THROUGH THE STATE PROPERTIES THAT'S GOING TO BE SOME TIME BEFORE THAT'S EVER REQUIRING A FOUR LANE UP THROUGH YOUR NEIGHBORHOOD, BUT I'M TALKING ULTIMATELY, MAYOR I'M SPEAKING ULTIMATELY ABOUT PLANNING FUTURE PLANS. YES, I

[01:45:03]

KNOW, BUT WE ARE PRESERVING AS A RESULT OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT HERE IN A MINUTE, THE SAME RIGHT AWAY. WE HAVE WITH START US AT THIS POINT. WHICH ALLOWS US TEXT EXPANSION ROOM IN THE FUTURE. WHAT WE'RE DOING IS TALKING ABOUT ARE WE GOING TO REQUIRE THIS PROPERTY OWNER TO DEVELOP? THAT S CURVE AT THIS POINT FOR SOMETHING THAT ISN'T JUSTIFIED AT THIS POINT FOR THE USES THAT ARE EXPECTED IN THAT AREA. I MEAN, TAKE A LOOK AT THIS MAP RIGHT HERE.

THAT'S ON UP. I MEAN, THE CUT UP PROPERTIES UP. THERE ARE NOT A HUGE PASTURE THAT CAN DEVELOP INTO A MASTER PLAIN COMMUNITY. I MEAN, COLLECTING ALL OF THOSE PROPERTIES TO PUT THE KIND OF TRAFFIC THAT YOU WOULD NEED TO JUSTIFY A FOUR LANE DOWN TO STRAIGHTER ROAD. IS JUST LAUGHABLE. I KNOW. BUT STRANGER THINGS HAVE HAPPENED. I MEAN, NO, I FOLLOW AND ROBSON IS ROSENSTEIN IS WHERE WAS PASTURE? NO I KNOW, BUT THIS ISN'T THAT'S MY POINT IS THAT THIS IS NOT A PASTOR. THIS IS A BUNCH OF PROPERTY OWNERS. THAT WOULD BE VERY DIFFICULT TO COOK TO COLLAPSE THOSE TOGETHER AND CREATE A LARGE MASTER PLANNED COMMUNITY. THAT'S NOT AN IDEAL TYPE OF THING TO GRAB THE ONE ABOVE IT THE PROPERTIES ABOVE IT ARE IN THE TOWN AND CONTROLLED BY OUR ZONING. AND THEN ROBES IN ITSELF HAS NO DEMAND TO GET DOWN TO THE HIGH SCHOOL. THEY'RE IN DEBT AND I SD. AND THE AMOUNT OF TRAFFIC THAT WOULD BE FROM A NEIGHBORHOOD OF THAT SIZE WOULD CERTAINLY HAVE SCHOOL TRAFFIC. IF THERE WAS A REGULAR COMMUNITY THAT WASN'T 55 PLUS. BUT FOR FOUR LANES ALL THE WAY DOWN. I AGREE WITH YOU. THE SPORTS FACILITY WILL PUT SOME TRAFFIC UP TO STRAIGHTER ROAD. BUT WHERE WERE THEY COULD BE GOING IF THEY'RE GOING NORTH? AND WHAT EASTER WEST IS FINE, BUT THE TEA IS FINE. YOU DON'T NEED IT TO BE AN S CURVE VOTED FOR THE FIRST TIME. I WAS ALL FOR THIS THE FIRST TIME. I KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT HIM. SO WITH ALL DUE RESPECT I'M TALKING ABOUT SPECIFICALLY YOUR COMMENTS ABOUT ABOUT FLORENCE ROAD, NOT NEEDING NOW OR IN THE FUTURE TO BE A FOUR LINE DIVIDED ROADWAY. THAT'S WHAT MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLANE IS. IN THIS CORNER. IT'S HARD, BUT I'M TALKING ABOUT THE CONTEXT HERE, SO I THINK WE ACTUALLY AGREE IN THE SOUTHERN PART OF IT. THERE PROBABLY WILL BE A NEED IN THE FUTURE. BUT UP HERE I'M SAYING THAT IT JUSTIFIES T JUNCTIONS WHEN WE DON'T NEED A FOUR LANE TO CROSS STRAIT A ROAD. I'M SAYING THAT IT IS WITHIN REASON TO CONSIDER NOT CONNECTING IT AND USING THE S CURVE, AND THAT'S MY ENCOURAGEMENT TO THE COUNCIL IS THAT THE T JUNCTIONS ARE APPROPRIATE. TO ALLOW THIS PROJECT TO CONTINUE. BECAUSE THIS IS THE DECISION WE NEED TO MAKE IN ORDER TO ENABLE US TO MAKE THE NEXT ONE. FURTHER DISCUSSION. CONSIDERATION. OPEN FOR MOTIONS. HAND. SECOND WE GOT. YES, HE'S STILL OFF CENTER. NO, WE DIDN'T. AND HIS HIS FOR SOME REASON IT STRUCK DOWN. THE MIDDLE THIRD BUTTON DOWN TO TRY THAT. YES, THE RACIAL THE THIRD ONE. ALREADY RECYCLED IT. OKAY, THIRD ONE DAY. AUTO. LET'S SEE AND PUT THAT'S AND. MENU. MHM. I DO ANYTHING HE DOESN'T FEEL WISH. I KINDA LIKED IT. YOU TURN IT OFF. BEAR WITH US HERE.

SAYING, YEAH. RIGHT. OKAY, SO I THINK THAT'S THE VOTING SYSTEM. IT'S NOT THE SCREEN. LET'S JUST MAKE SURE THAT HAS VOTES RECOURSE. OTHER. REALLY MESSING WITH ALL RIGHT. DO WE NEED TO GO TO AUDIO WE WERE WE WERE THERE, BUT. YOU KNOW? THIS POWER. YOU START. DR FORTUNE. WE WANT TO GO TO AUDIO. THAT'S TRUE. YES, WE DO. OKAY. OKAY ALL RIGHT. SO

[01:50:03]

I WILL LET THOSE WHO ALREADY MADE THE MOTIONS MAKE THEIR MOTIONS. SO MOTION. ALRIGHT COUNSELOR BORDER HAS THE MOTION COUNSEL. HARDIMAN HAS THE SECOND ALL THOSE IN FAVOR.

ALRIGHT. ALRIGHT. ANY OPPOSED. BILL INDUSTRY GROUPS. OKAY THE VOTE IS SIX AND ONE PLACE TO VOTED NO. I BELIEVE IT'S RIGHT. YOU VOTED FOR IT. YEAH, YOU CAN TEACH. CAPITAL ALRIGHT, WE GOT IT. ALL RIGHT, NUMBER K. I DID IT. YOU DID IT. YEAH. IT'S A LONG STANDING JOKE. I DON'T

[5.K. Proposed Development Agreement with Kenneth and Cathy Frisby related to an approximately 14.2855-acre tract of land situated in the 5.J.E. Anderson Survey, Abstract No. 22, generally located on the northeast corner of Florance Road and Strader Road/ Robson Ranch Road]

CARE, MR CORN. LETTER K. THANK YOU. OKAY, SO WE'VE GOT THE TO OFFSET TEAS. NOW WE HAVE BEFORE YOU A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. AND UM, I HAD AN ORIGINAL PROPOSAL TO MR FRISBY AND THAT'S IN YOUR PACKET. TWO. FOR THE COMPLETE RIGHT AWAY THE ULTIMATE RIGHT OF WAY ON. BOTH FLORENCE AND STRAIGHTER SLASH ROPES AND RANCH. UH, THE. 32 ACRE PROPERTIES. UH, THEY WOULD ACTUALLY. PUSH BACK AN ADDITIONAL 30 FT. BAD. TO MAINTAIN THAT, SO WE'RE GETTING THE ULTIMATE RIGHT AWAY. SO WE'RE GOING TO ANOTHER 30 FT SO IT'S PUSHING BACK TO THE EAST INTO HIS PROPERTY. REQUESTED. SIDEWALK COMPLETELY AROUND. NOW WE'RE GOING TO WORK WITH THE DEVELOPER OF. START US RANCH BECAUSE THEY LEFT OFF A PIECE THERE. AND THEN THERE'S A PROPERTY OWNER AROUND THE CORNER ON THE NORTH END OF THIS PROJECT. THAT'S NOT PART OF STARTUPS, NOT PART OF MR FRISBEES PROPERTY. SO THAT WILL THE TOWN AND PROBABLY PART OF OUR FLORENCE WORD ROAD PROJECT WILL CONNECT ALL THAT SIDEWALK TOGETHER, BUT THAT'S NOT PART OF THIS AGREEMENT. SO UM, MR FRISBY IN THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT THAT WE PROPOSED WAS GOING WAS WILLING OR. WE REQUESTED OF HIM TO DEDICATE THE RIGHT AWAY FOR THE FOR THE FULL WITH OF FLORENCE AND STRAIGHTER. UH BASICALLY 60 FT FROM CENTERLINE. UM A SIDEWALK AROUND AND THEN THE COUNCIL'S END OF IT. THEY WOULD CONSIDER THIS ZONING FROM. REAL RESIDENTIAL TO THE R A. P D, WHICH IS 32 ACRE LOTS, THE RESULTING THE REMAINING LOT.

WOULD BE ABOUT EIGHT ACRES OR SO AND IT WOULD STAY IN ONE SINGLE LOT. UH SO THAT WAS THAT WAS GIVEN TO MR FRISBY THE BEGINNING OF THE MONTH, AND THEN HE HADN'T HAD AN OPPORTUNITY. CONSULT IS ATTORNEY SO I SENT YOU AN EMAIL AND CAME BACK WITH WITH HIS COUNTER OFFER. AND UM AND THEN AT THE END OF THAT, WE KIND OF WENT BACK AND FORTH SO. I CAN DESCRIBE HIS COUNTER OFFER IN GENERAL TERMS. I CAN DESCRIBE WHAT WE ARE. WHAT WE WHAT WE END UP COMING TO, UM I JUST WANT TO MAKE THE. SURE THE COUNCIL UNDERSTANDS THE STEPS IN THIS AND. THAT THERE WAS SOME MOVEMENT AFTER THE THIS THIS MEETING OCCURRED MONDAY IN YOUR PACKETS WERE PREPARED FRIDAY. SO I'D BE GLAD TO GO THROUGH ANY OF THOSE WITH YOU.

PLEASE COVER THE DIFFERENCES. OKAY, SO, MR FRISBY, UH, THAT WAS QUITE HERE HE FELT AND HE CAN SPEAK FOR HIMSELF. HE'S HERE. THAT WAS QUITE A BIT OF RIGHT AWAY TO TAKE, AND HE ASKED THAT THE TOWN UH, PAY FOR HALF OF THAT HE WOULD GIVE HALF IN THE TOWN WOULD PAY FOR HALF THAT'S IT FULL 60. UH, TYPICALLY WHEN YOU TYPICALLY WHEN YOU DEVELOP PROPERTY THE.

SIDEWALKS ARE BUILT ON THE FRONTAGE OF IT. AND SO AND MR FRISBY HAS NO. AH NO DESIRE FOR SIDEWALK. HE'S NOT GOING TO. HE'S NOT GOING TO HAVE A NEW CONSTRUCTION PROJECT. SO YES, AT THE TOWN PAY FOR THE SIDEWALK ALONG ROPES AND RANCH. IN THE PART OF THE PROJECT, THE SIDEWALK ON FLORENCE. WOULD BE BUILT. AND SO THAT'S KIND OF HIS HIS END OF IT. UM AND, UM AND THAT THE TAKE THE. THE TWO ACRES WENT TOO FAR TO THE EAST AND HIS PROPERTY. SO HE ASKED THAT THOSE BE DOWN TO 1.9, AND THAT WOULD BE THE REMAINDER. I TOLD HIM AND AGAIN, HE CAN

[01:55:07]

VERIFY THIS OR COMMENT. THIS THIS IS WHAT WENT DOWN. UM SO IF. I SAID ONE OF THE GOALS WAS THE COUNCIL WANTED TO ACRE LOTS. AND THAT WAS AS FAR AS THEY'D GO WE'VE. WEAVE WEAVE WEAVE COMPROMISE STONES ON SOME OF THE ONE ACRE LOTS AND THE COUNCIL WAS I BELIEVED IN MY INTERPRETATION THAT. IT SHOULD BE A TWO ACRE LOT. ANOTHER THING THAT THE COUNCIL WANTED WAS A SIDEWALK ALL THE WAY AROUND, OR AT LEAST WHAT WE COULD CONTROL. SO WHAT WE CAME TO WAS WE WOULD TAKE. MM 30 FT OF RIGHT AWAY BUILD JUST THE TWO LANES, NOT THE FOUR LANE DIVIDED. UH THE SIDEWALK WOULD BE BUILT ON THESE 32 ACRE LOTS. AND THEN MR FRISBY WOULD BUILD ACROSS THE FRONT OF HIS, BUT WE WOULD GIVE HIM CREDITS EQUAL TO THE AMOUNT OF THAT SIDEWALK. SO THOSE ALL THE MOVING PIECES TRY TO ANSWER YOUR QUESTIONS AGAIN. I'M TRYING TO HELP YOU UNDERSTAND WHAT. WHAT WAS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED. WHAT IS COUNTER OFFER WAS WHAT WE AGREED THE TWO OF US AGREED TO. IT'S ULTIMATELY YOUR DECISION. YOU CAN TAKE ANY THREE OF THOSE OR WORK YOUR OWN DEAL OUT. WE'VE GOT A DOUBLE SPACED AGREEMENT HERE. WE CAN. WE CAN.

WE'LL GET ASHLEY TO HELP US AS BEST WE CAN TO MARKET UP. WE'D LIKE MR FRISBY TO SIGN IT BEFORE YOU CONSIDER YOUR ZONING, SO WE REALLY NEED TO GET IT. DONE TONIGHT OR WE NEED TO READ RESCHEDULED. YOU KNOW, WE NEED TO COME BACK AT IT THIS AGAIN, SO I'LL LET. UH I'LL ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS YOU HAVE, AND I'LL LET YOU I'M SURE MR FRISBY LOVE TO TALK TO IS THE DRAFT AND OUR COUNCIL. THE ORIGINAL INTENTIONS THAT YOU JUST STATED FOR COUNCIL THAT TWO ACRE LOST THE SIDEWALK WOULD BE BUILT WITH NO MONEY OUT POCKET FOR RIGHT AWAY.

CORRECT. THE IN YOUR POCKET IS. WHAT MY ORIGINAL PARLEY WAS TO THEM. 32 ACRE LOTS COMPLETE SIDEWALK AT NO COST TO THE TOWN. AND, UM THE TOWN WOULD DO THE THREE 32 ACRE LOTS.

SIDEWALK ALL AROUND COMPLETE ULTIMATE WIDTH ROAD WITH FOR RIGHT AWAY DEDICATION. ARE WE GIVING CREDITS IN THIS AGREEMENT? WHICH. ONE I'M GETTING CONFUSED ON THESE THINGS RIGHT NOW. THE ONE IN YOUR PACKET DOES NOT HAVE ANY WAIVERS OR CREDITS. ALL RIGHT, BECAUSE I DON'T BELIEVE WE SHOULD BE GIVING CREDITS OR WAIVERS. SINCE WE'RE DOING THE FRISBEES A FAVOR, BASICALLY. UM, THAT'S THAT IS I'M NOT. IT'S MY POSITION, OKAY? BEFORE WE GET INTO THAT PART OF THE DISCUSSION. YOU HAVE ANYTHING ELSE AS FAR AS THE CLARITY AROUND. WHERE WE'RE AT GOING QUICK QUESTION. UM EXCUSE ME. LOT SIZES AND STARTED BRANCH.

SO UH, SOUTH OF ROBES GRANTS THERE FIVE ACRES ALONG FLORENCE THERE, TWO ACRES AND, UM. KIND OF ONCE YOU GET PAST THOSE IN YARBOROUGH AND NORTH OF ROBSON AND BEHIND THE TWO ACRES ARE ALL ONE ACRE. OKAY, SO WE'VE GOT BASICALLY THE SAME LOOK. AT 1.9 ACRES VERSUS WELL THERE, I BELIEVE IT'S I BELIEVE IT'S PV IS A IS A SEPARATE PRIVATE OWNER. THAT WASN'T PART OF FRISBEE AND WASN'T PART OF STARDUST. I THINK HE'S GOT. A FIVE ACRE OR SO LOT, BUT YES.

THIS COMING THAT EVERYTHING ABOVE. IT IS TWO ACRES THAN ATTEND THAN A FIVE. THEN THESE TWO AND WITH ALL DUE RESPECT. TO EVERY ALL THE COMMENTS BEING MADE HERE. MR FRISBY WAS JUST SITTING OUT THERE MINDING HIS OWN BUSINESS AND THE COUNCIL OF NORTH LIKE CHANGE THE ZONING FOR STARDUST. SO IN ORDER TO MAKE THAT WHOLE AREA. SIMILAR IN NATURE. THAT'S WHY WE'RE DOING THIS. SO THIS WAS REALLY PUT UPON HIM. I DON'T KNOW THAT MR FRISBY WOULD BE DEVELOPING AT ALL IF EVERYTHING AROUND HIM STAYED. THE WAY IT WAS BEFORE ALL THE ZONING CHANGES HAPPENED SO SMART CATIONS. I CAN CRY, MR. TRUE MR. MR CORN, CAN YOU CLARIFY FOR ME AND THIS IS JUST TO THIS POINT ABOUT BEING STANDARD IN THE SAME I MADE A SIMILAR POINT. MY POINT WAS, I MEANT TO ASK YOU TO MAKE SURE THIS IS THE CASE OR THE TWO ACRE LOTS. WHAT IS THE FRONTAGE ON FLORENCE FOR THE TWO ACRE LOTS AND STARDUST IN COMPARISON TO THE TWO ACRE LOTS. THESE ARE THESE DEEPER AND THINNER. ARE THEY SIMILAR FRONTAGE THERE? SIMILAR SIMILAR SHAPED AND, UH AND THROUGH PLANNING FOR STARTUPS. WE'VE GOT THE FULL 60 FT FROM CENTER LINE, BUT WE'RE GOING TO DO WE'RE GOING TO PUT THE RIGHT AWAY DEDICATION AHEAD OF THIS, AND WE'RE. WILL MAKE

[02:00:01]

YOU KNOW WE'LL HAVE THAT. AND SO WHEN HE PLANTS THERE WON'T BE A AND ADDITIONAL RIGHT AWAY.

DEDICATION IT'LL ALREADY BE PART OF THIS AGREEMENT. AND THEN YOU GOT SOMETHING ELSE? HOW IS IT GOING TO TALK THE COUNCIL AS A WHOLE REALLY NEEDS TO FIRST DECIDE WHAT WE'RE GOING TO BE VOTING ON WHAT PARTS OF THE AGREEMENT WERE GOING TO BE VOTING ON BECAUSE THERE'S A LOT OF MOVING PIECES IN THIS RIGHT NOW. UM. I WOULD PROPOSE AN OPEN FOR DISCUSSION.

THAT THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT AS WE GAVE INSTRUCTIONS TO DREW. MM. AND AS WRITTEN IN OUR PACKETS BE THE ITEM CONSIDERED, UNLESS THERE'S CONSENSUS TO CHANGE THAT AGREEMENT WITH MR FRISBEES. CONSENT. OBVIOUSLY, BEFORE WE TAKE A VOTE. MR COREN STARTED DRAG YOU BACK INTO THIS, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHAT CONSIDERATIONS WERE GIVEN TO STARDUST. DID THEY DEDICATE WITHOUT SUBSIDY? THE RIGHT OF WAY FOR FLORENCE, DID THEY BUILD THE SIDEWALKS THEMSELVES ENTIRELY? UM, WHAT IS WHAT WAS THE RELATIONSHIP ON THAT AGREEMENT WHEN THEY PLANTED THEY BUILT? THEY DID IT DEDICATED TO COMPLETE RIGHT OF WAY THEY BUILT THE INTERNAL COLLECTOR STREETS. THEY BROUGHT THE WATER LINE UP. TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF FLORENCE. UM.

THEY BUILT? YES THEY BUILT ALL THE SIDEWALKS. UM, MAY I ASK HOW MANY LOTS ARE IN STARDUST? SORRY I DON'T MEAN TO JUMP INTO QUESTION, BUT THAT'S KIND OF BELIEVE. 1 50 SO 150 VERSUS THREE. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU'RE GOING THIS WAY, MISS HARDIMAN OR NOT. I'LL THROW SOMETHING OUT THERE TO BUILD ON THAT. I DON'T NECESSARILY LIKE THE IDEA OF IMPOSING UPON HIS ORIGINAL PROPERTY. CONDITIONS THAT WE'RE IMPOSING ON THE ONES THAT ARE SUBDIVIDING. SO TO ME, IF YOU'RE SUBDIVIDING PROPERTY, THOSE PROPERTIES NEED TO CONTRIBUTE THE SIDEWALK AND THE RIGHT OF WAY. WHEN WE'RE ASKING FOR HIS ORIGINAL PROPERTY, THE REMAINING EIGHT ACRES. I FEEL LIKE WE'RE GOING A LITTLE BIT FURTHER THAN NORMAL TO ASK HIM TO BUILD THE SIDEWALK ACROSS HIS PROPERTY, THE ORIGINAL THE ORIGINAL PROPERTY. AND SO AS FAR AS. I CAN UNDERSTAND ON THAT ONE. THAT PIECE OF IT, WHICH BY THE WAY, THAT IT'S A PRETTY SMALL IN COMPARISON TO THE OVERALL COUNTER OFFER HERE. BUT I THINK IT'S A TOKEN THAT IS WORTHY OF CONSIDERATION THAT THE TOWN COMPLETE THAT PIECE. UM BY PURCHASING THAT. THAT SIDEWALK AND PUTTING THE SIDEWALK IN ON THAT PIECE, BUT THAT'S JUST THE SOUTHERN PART ACROSS THE EIGHT ACRES TO CONNECT FROM STARDUST LISTENING THE, UH, THE NEXT PROPERTY OWNER IN STARDUST OVER TO THE FIRST OF THESE THREE ON THE SOUTH PARK. BUT I DO THINK THAT THE RIGHT OF WAY ON THE SIDEWALKS FOR THE SUBDIVIDED PROPERTIES, ITS ITS PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT, YOU KNOW, RIGHT HERE, SO ON THE TOP PART OF THE SCREEN. I THINK THAT THE RIGHT AWAY AND THE SIDEWALK IS SOMETHING THAT WE ASK FROM EVERY SUBDIVIDING PROPERTY OWNER AND THAT SHOULD BE DEDICATED AROUND THOSE PROPERTIES, BUT THE ONE ACROSS HIS ORIGINAL PROPERTY THAT REMAINS HE'S NOT DEVELOPING THAT IT'S BEING LEFT HIS RESIDUAL AND TO ME. ASKING HIM TO PAY TO SIDEWALK THAT. AND DONATE LAND. THERE'S SOMETHING THAT I'M NOT REAL COMFORTABLE WITH THAT PIECE. CANADA YOUR POINT THERE, MAYOR. I'M SORRY. MARINA DI JOINT TEAM. UM. AND MR FRISBY. I HOPE YOU DON'T TAKE OFFENSE THIS, HE SAID IN OPEN SESSION THAT WE IF WE DON'T APPROVE A C STANDS TO LOSE A LOT OF PROFITABILITY AND ASKING THEM BUILD THAT SMALL SIDEWALK. TO GET THAT WINDFALL. I DON'T THINK IS A IS A MAJOR HURDLE. FOR HIM AND THAT'S JUST LIKE THAT. DON'T NO DISRESPECT, MR FRISBY. AT ALL, BUT IT'S A COST OF DOING DEVELOPMENT DOING BUSINESS, UM, ESPECIALLY WHEN IT'S BEING WE COULD VERY EASILY THROUGH ZONING POWERS JUST SAY FLAT OUT. NO. AND THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WOULD AFFECT HIM DRASTICALLY. SO I FEEL THAT IF THIS GENTLEMAN WANTS TO DEVELOP THIS PROPERTY AND SUBDIVIDED INTO LOTS THAT. THOSE THINGS TO MAKE IT PART OF THE COMMUNITY IN THAT AREA OF TOWN. SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AS HIM ACTING AS A DEVELOPER. UH I THINK LET'S JUST USE FICTITIOUS EXAMPLE ACROSS THE STREET HERE IN THE SOUTH SIDE PER SECOND. WE'VE GOT THE JACKSONS AND WE HAVE DR SESSIONS. PROPERTY OWNERS IF EITHER ONE OF THEM WANTED TO PUT A FIVE ACRE LOT, WHICH IS APPROPRIATE WITHIN THE ZONE. UM.

AND I WANTED TO PUT SOMETHING THERE AND OR SOMETHING SOMETHING SMALLER THAN FIVE ACRES. AND WE SAID, WE WANT THE SIDEWALK CONNECTORS. WE WOULD BE ASKING THEM TO BUILD THE SIDEWALK JUST FOR THAT PARTICULAR PORTION. WE WOULDN'T NECESSARILY GO TO DR SESSIONS AND SAY, OH, YOU HAVE 100 ACRES. I WANT A HALF A MILE A SIDEWALK ALL THE WAY AROUND THE RIM OF THE PROPERTY IN ORDER TO HAVE A TWO ACRE LOT. IF HE SAID, DIVIDES THE WHOLE THING, THEN YES, YOU'VE GOT TO BUILD THE WHOLE THING. IF IT'S THE COUNCIL'S WISHES, BUT TO ME, I

[02:05:04]

JUST I DON'T LIKE THE PRESIDENT OF IMPOSING UPON A PIECE OF PROPERTY THAT EXISTS TODAY. IF IT'S SUB DIVIDES, EVERYTHING THAT'S IN THE SUBDIVISION NEEDS TO BE DEDICATE THE RIGHT AWAY FOR THAT. DEPARTMENT E AND ALSO FOR THE SIDEWALK AND AS A AS A COURTESY TO US. I THINK THAT HIS WILLINGNESS TO SELL AND LET US BUILD THE SIDEWALK ACROSS HIS PROPERTY FOR THE.

CONNECTION PURPOSES THAT THIS HAS SOME UTILITY I THINK IS APPROPRIATE FOR US TO CONSIDER, BUT I DON'T WANT TO IMPOSE UPON THE ORIGINAL PIECES OF PROPERTY BECAUSE I THINK THAT'S A BAD PRECEDENT MYSELF. IT'S MY TAKE. YOU KNOW, I UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF A DEVELOPMENT. IT'S WHEN YOU COME IN AND YOU GOT A PIECE OF LAND AND YOU DO A DEVELOPMENT LIKE STARDUST RANCH.

SO EVERYBODY WHO LIVES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF STARDUST RANCH IS A MEMBER OF STARDUST WRENCH COMMUNITY. OKAY THESE THREE PROPERTIES AREN'T PART OF WHAT I WOULD CONSIDER A DEVELOPMENT.

AWFULLY INVITE THEM TO BE A PART OF US AND THAT'S GREAT. BUT WHAT I'M SAYING FROM A DEVELOPMENT STANDPOINT AND SPEAKING STRICTLY FROM A DEVELOPMENT STANDPOINT, I THINK FROM A SOCIAL ASPECT, THEY WILL PROBABLY BE GREAT NEIGHBORS. BUT MY POINT IS FROM A DEVELOPMENT STANDPOINT. YOU'RE NOT CREATING A QUOTE DEVELOPMENT HERE. YOU'RE.

SEGMENTING OUT 32 ACRE LOTS FOR THREE. DIFFERENT PROPERTY OWNERS TO OWN THOSE THINGS, NOT INSIDE A DEVELOPMENT. THEY WILL HAVE NO H O A FEES. CORRECT OKAY, SO IT'S NOT A DEVELOPMENT PER SE. IT'S NOT FRISBEE HILLS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. OKAY, SO THERE'S NOTHING LIKE A REGULAR DEVELOPMENT. OKAY BUT YOU'RE IMPOSING UPON THEM THESE IDEALS OF A DEVELOPMENT WHERE THEY'RE HAVING TO PUT UP. I MEAN, IF I CUT UP MY PROPERTY ON ONE SIDE. AND THE PEOPLE WHO WANTED TO GET THE LOTS WANT TO PUT A SIDEWALK. GREAT, BUT I WOULDN'T WANT THAT SIDEWALK GOING ACROSS MY PROPERTY, NECESSARILY. SO I DON'T KNOW WHY WE HAVE TO MAKE HIM BUT I THINK IT'S A REAL NICE CONCESSION THAT YOU WOULD BE WILLING TO SELL THAT TO US. AND WE COULD PUT ASIDE WHAT TO CONNECT EVERYTHING. I THINK THAT'S NICE. I THINK THAT WE SHOULD CONSIDER IF EVERYONE'S ON BOARD WITH THIS IS SINCE WE'VE TAKEN SO MUCH. RIGHT AWAY FOR FLORENCE ROAD, AND WE WENT FROM 30 TO 60. FT. IS THAT CORRECT? UH WE TOOK AN ADDITIONAL 30 FT. WELL THERE'S IT'S UM, PRESCRIPTIVE, SO THERE'S NONE RIGHT NOW. UH SO WE WOULD. IF MR FRISBY WASN'T DEVELOPING, WE WOULD HAVE TO PURCHASE EITHER 30 OR 60 FT. FROM HIM. OKAY BUT WHAT WE'VE DONE. IN FACT, THE ORIGINAL PLAN WAS JUST TO DO TWO LANES AND TAKE 30 FT. TO BUILD THAT ROAD. SO IF HE'S WILLING TO GIVE US THE THIRD, THE 30 OR 60. BUT IN YOUR PACKET IS 60 FT.

BUT WHEN WE DISCUSSED THAT, AND LIKE I SAID IN HIS DEFENSE, HE NEVER HAD A HE NEVER HAD A CHANCE TO RESPOND TO THAT. SO I'M GETTING TO THAT PART OUT THERE SO. WHEN YOU TAKE 60 FT OF FRONTAGE, THEN I THINK YOU SHOULD ALLOW HIM THE 1.8 ACRES. I MEAN, YOU'VE GOT ONE ACRES INSIDE A START US RANCH JUST BECAUSE THE PERIMETER AND I DON'T THINK ANYONE WITH THEIR NAKED EYE IS GOING TO BE ABLE TO TELL THAT THIS LAW IS 10.1. SMALLER THAN THE ADJOINING LOTS, MR FRISBY, ONE THAT COULD COMMENT. JUST. ACTUALLY, UH. AGREED WITHDREW TO ADD AN ADDITIONAL 30 FT TO EACH LOT. I UNDERSTAND, BUT I'M JUST SAYING I, UH BECAUSE WE TALKED ABOUT THAT, AND WE WANT TO KEEP IT AS CLOSE TO ACRES. WE CAN. SO WHAT I TOLD YOU WHO WAS OUR COMPROMISE, AND I WOULD. RESURVEY AND ADD 30 MORE FEET TO THE DEPTH OF EVERY LOT TO MAINTAIN CLOSER TO THE TWO ACRES. I TOLD HIM, I WOULD DO THAT. I WOULD DO THAT. NO, NO, NO AT ALL. NO I TOLD HIM. I TOLD HIM. UM, HE SAID HE WOULD. AND THAT'S. SO THE PROPOSAL IN YOUR PACKETS IS A 60 FT SHIFT. UH, THE. WHEN WE CAME BACK, THERE'D BE A 30 FT SHIFT, SO WE'D ONLY GET 30 FT. WIDE AWAY. BUT WE'RE ONLY BUILDING TWO ROADS AND THEN HE DON'T HAVE TO SHIP DONATE. I DONATE THE 30 RIGHT AND HE CHIPPED HIS PROPERTY STATE OF 60 FT TO THE EAST OF ONLY 30 FT. 30 MORE FEET TO IT, SO IT SO IT'S A NET 60 FT. DONATE 30 FT FOR THE ROAD AND I. ADD ADDITIONAL 30 FT TO THE LINES, SO THAT ONE DAY IF WE NEED THE OTHER 30, IT'S AVAILABLE AND IT CAN BE PURCHASED. CORRECT, AND THAT'S ANOTHER. CORRECT KIND OF BIGGER PICTURE GOING BACK TO OUR THIRD FLOOR PLAN. I MEAN, WE'RE GETTING WITH THE COMPROMISE AGREEMENT. WE'RE GETTING ENOUGH TO BUILD THE TWO LANES SOMEDAY IN THE FUTURE, AND WE'LL MAKE SURE THESE LOTS ARE SET BACK FAR ENOUGH IF WE EVER WANT TO DO A FOUR LANE. WE'RE GONNA NEED TO GO TO EACH OF THESE PROPERTY OWNERS AND ACQUIRE THAT, RIGHT LIKE WE WOULD GETTING WHAT WE NEEDED ALREADY. THIS IS A CONVERSATION THAT WAS ABOUT TO HAPPEN BECAUSE THAT ROADS ABOUT TO GET. YEP REDONE SO LIKE, BASICALLY DID THAT SO? AND IF THAT HAPPENED EVER. THEN

[02:10:09]

THEY WOULDN'T BE LESS THAN 1.8. I MEAN, THEY WOULD STILL BE COMPARABLE TO YOU KNOW, 1.952 ACRES. MR FRISBY, CAN YOU? UM SORRY I'M JUMPING INTO YOUR TIME. DID YOU WANT TO FINISH.

OKAY ALL RIGHT. CAN YOU CLARIFY FOR ME? UH, WHAT IS YOUR COUNTER OFFER? YES WELL, WHAT WE AGREED TO AND I WHEN WE MET SEVERAL HOURS ON MONDAY. I WOULD DONATE OR GIVE UP THE RIGHT AWAY FOR THE ROAD IMPROVEMENT AS IT'S NEEDED NOW FOR THE TWO LANES, THREE LANES.

HARD TO JUST TWO LINES ON FLORENCE. OKAY. 30 FT. 30. FT. YES. I WOULD ALSO. ON THE THREE LOTS. UM. BUILD THE SIDEWALKS AS THE HOMES ARE DEVELOPED IN WHAT PAY FOR THAT ARE THE IT WOULD PASS ON TO THE HOMEOWNERS THAT WE WOULD CONNECT THE SIDEWALKS LIKE Y'ALL WANTED.

AND I WOULDN'T ADDITION TO THAT. INCREASE THE DEPTH. OF EACH LOT 30 MORE FEET TO THE EAST TO MAINTAIN. YOU KNOW, CLOSE TO TWO ACRES. AND THE ONLY THING I TOLD HIM I WAS LIKE, LOOK ON THE EIGHT ACRES. I DON'T WANT TO DEVELOP YET. ACRES I DON'T WANT TO KNOCK MY HOUSE DOWN AND BUILDING THE HOUSE. I DON'T WANT TO MOVE IT. IT'S GOING TO STAY THERE. I HAVE NO. REASON TO DEVELOP THAT WHICH THEN NEGATES CONNECTING THE SIDEWALK. BECAUSE IF YOU CAN EXERCISE WHAT? KEEP REVEALING, I'M NOT DEVELOPING THE WHOLE 15 ACRES. I'M SO DIVIDING SIX. AND IF YOU WILL DOING THREE, MULTI OR THREE SINGLE FAMILY HOMES, NOT NOT DEVELOPMENT IS. AS HARD AMENDMENT STATED, AND IT'S NOT A CHOICE. THERE IS NO H AH, THEY'RE NOT GOING TO PAY A CHOICE. DUES. UM. AND SO THAT'S WAS MY COUNTER. IF YOU WILL GO AND WHAT MONETARY WHERE YOU ASKING FOR? NO CREDITS. YOU'RE ASKING FOR DOLLARS DOLLARS HE PROPOSED. YEAH SOME POTENTIAL CREDITS. I ASKED FOR NO MONEY. YEAH, I KNOW. WHAT'S THE VALUE THE CREDITS THAT YOU WERE? OTHERS THAT IN OH, UM WHAT DO WE SAY THAT STRETCHES SIDEWALK WAS ROUGHLY $15,000. SO THAT'S WHAT WE'RE ASKING FOR IS $15,000 CREDITS, RIGHT? WE JUST TO CONFIRM AND ASHLEY'S GONNA NEED TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO DRAFT THIS ALL UP. YOU WANT TO SIDEWALK BUILT? OR AT LEAST CONSENSUS WANTS THE SIDEWALK CONNECTED RIGHT NOW. WE'RE JUST ARGUING IF HE PAYS FORWARD AND WE GIVE HIM WAIVERS, BUT THE SITE. THE MAJORITY. WANT THE SIDEWALK BUILT IT JUST HOW DOES HE PAY FOR IT? OR DO WE PAY FOR IT THROUGH CASH OR THROUGH WAIVERS? YES YES. COMPLETE WELL, I WOULD THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SIDEWALK ON LOT 12 AND THREE WHAT WOULD BE DONE WITH THE BUILDING OR DEVELOPMENT OR EACH HOMEOWNER SO THAT WOULD TRANSFER DOWN? TALKED ABOUT THAT? THAT'S COMMON. WE DON'T WANT THOSE TRUCKS COMING OVER SO THEY WOULD HAVE BEEN ASKING FOR THAT. SO I ACTUALLY HAVE ONE OF MY FUTURE. HOPEFULLY UM, PURCHASERS OF AND THAT SO IF HE WERE TO BUILD A HOUSE ON LOT TWO, THEN HE WOULD PAY FOR THE SIDEWALK. FROM WHAT 2 TO 1. THAT PART I UNDERSTAND SO. IS THE GIST OF THE AGREEMENT THAT YOU'RE ASKING FOR $15,000 IN CREDITS TO GET THIS PLAN. AND THAT'S IN LIEU OF BUILDING THE SIDEWALK ACROSS YOUR PROPERTY WOULD BE GIVING AN EXTRA 15 THOUSANDS THAT YOU CAN DO THAT COST HIM DONATE EVERYTHING ELSE IN 15,000 WHAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. YES. AND THAT'S WHAT THE 60 FT RIGHT AWAY. UH NO. THAT THE OFFER ON THE TABLE IS A IS A 30 FT. NOW WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A CHALLENGE OF WHERE TO PUT THAT SIDEWALK AND WE PUT IT. WITHIN THAT 30 FT RIGHT AWAY OR DO WE PUT IT? WE COULD GET A SIDEWALK EASEMENT. I THINK WE DO. IT IS THE SAME LINE. I THINK IT'S MAKES SENSE TO DO IT ON THE SAME LINE. YES ON THE 60 FOOTER, THE 30 FT ON THE SAME LINE THAT WHEREVER ASSAD WILL GET IS RIGHT NOW. IT'S OKAY THEN. I DON'T I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY FEET OFF THE ROAD. THE EXISTING IS MY ASK MR CORN IS THAT THIS MODEL STARDUST WHEREVER THE DISTANCE FROM THE ROADWAY, THE SIDEWALK IS IN STARDUST. I WANTED THE SAME SPOT ON THESE PROPERTIES. WHATEVER THE RIGHT OF WAY WE HAVE IN STARDUST IS THE RIGHT OF WAY THAT I WANT ON THIS PROPERTY WHEN WE'RE DONE TONIGHT. YES SO WE NEED 30 FT, RIGHT AWAY RIGHT NOW IN ORDER TO MATCH THE ADJOINING PROPERTIES. BLUE. WE NEED 60 60. SO 60 IS WHAT. I'M JUST LOOKING AT THIS BECAUSE IT'S SHOWING 30 FROM THE MIDDLE OF THE ROAD ON THE PV PROPERTY. AND THEN THERE'S A PROPERTY AND THE VERY TAIL END OF THIS PICTURE, AND IT SHOWS THAT 30 FT PROPERTY RIGHT AWAY EXTENDING INTO THE NEXT PROPERTY. THAT'S ANOTHER NON START US PROPERTY, OKAY? DO YOU HAVE 16 STARTUPS? YOU HAVE 30

[02:15:02]

IN THE TWO MIDDLE OKAY? SO ESSENTIALLY MATCHING THE 30 IN THE MIDDLE. IF THERE IS 60 IN STARDUST, I WOULD IMAGINE THAT. IF YOU FINALLY TOOK THAT THEY WOULD HAVE TO MOVE THEIR MAILBOXES BACK EVERYTHING YEAH, AND MOVE THEIR SIDEWALK BACK LIKE IT'S A FULL. REDESIGN MOVE EVERYTHING SO THEIR SIDEWALK IS BUILT. IF YOU WANT TO SEE IT, YOU CAN SEE WHERE THE SIDEWALK IS ON GOOGLE. AND THEN AGAIN, WE'RE TALKING. HOW LONG WILL IT BE TO WE ACTUALLY NEED THAT TO BE FOUR LANES? NOT A NICE TO LANE 60. THEN WE'RE GOOD. IN TERMS OF. BUT IF WE NEEDED IN THE FUTURE, IT'S GOING TO COST A HELL OF A LOT MORE. WELL, NO, I MEAN THE. THE RIGHT OF WAY IS ONE THING I'M SAYING WHERE WE PUT THAT SIDEWALK IF IT MATCHES EVEN IF YOU HAVE 60 FT OF RIGHT OF WAY AND START US RIGHT NOW, BUT THE SIDEWALK ON THE MAILBOXES ARE IN THAT. THE SIDEWALK MEASURES IT AT 60 FT FROM THE CENTER OF FLORENCE. SO IT'S GONNA HAVE TO MOVE BACK.

SO MR FRISBY, DO YOU WANT THE SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF YOUR PROPERTY? NOT NECESSARILY. I'M NOT ALLOWED TO WEAR ONE OF THIS. THINGS EVEN CAME FROM WHY HE. FORCING THE SIDEWALK CAME FROM ME. I'LL ADMIT IT BECAUSE THE SIDEWALK STARDUST ON BOTH SIDES FROM SENATOR. ALL RIGHT, SO I DON'T NECESSARILY WANT ANY SIDEWALKS. I JUST FOLLOWING WHAT YOU PROPOSE, RIGHT? SO WE GOT TO. WE GOT TWO PROBLEMS. 30 OR 60 FT. NOW YOU'RE YOU'RE OFFERING 30 FT IS IN ORDER TO GET THIS COUNTERPROPOSAL. UM. I'M BASICALLY OFF THAT OFF YOUR ASSESSMENT OF TWO LANE ROAD NOT SERVED ABOUT HER. I FOLLOW BUT STARTUPS HAS 60 SO UH, THAT THAT'S THAT'S ONE DECISION WE HAVE TO MAKE, AND THEN THE CREDITS AND LOUIS SIDEWALK IS THE SECOND ONE. WHERE WE AT HERE LIKE, WHAT'S WHAT'S THE GENERAL CONSENSUS HERE? WHAT ARE THE CREDITS IN THE FORM OF.

X CREDITS OR THERE WOULD BE ROAD IMPACT FEE CREDITS. WATER IMPACT THE CREDITS WE COULD LOOK AT. UH WAVING PART OF THE PORTION OF THE. BUILDING INSPECTION FEES. OKAY JUST TRYING TO THINK OF NON CASH WAYS TO MEET THE. 15,000 OR WE COULD. WE COULD JUST CONTRIBUTE 15,000 TO THAT SECTION OF SIDEWALK OR DIDN'T HAVE TO BE NON CASH WAIVERS. BUT MY CONCERN IS I. I DON'T LIKE USING TOWN GENERAL FUNDS FOR SIDEWALKS. I DIDN'T LIKE HIM.

PRAIRIE VIEW, THOUGH THAT WAS NEEDED. I AGREE IT WAS NEEDED. BUT I DON'T LIKE USING TOWN GENERAL FUNDS TO BENEFIT A SPECIFIC NEIGHBORHOOD. I AGREE WITH YOU, EXCEPT THIS PROPERTY IS NOT DEVELOPING. THAT'S THE DIFFERENCE IS ACTUALLY WITH MR PEAVEY, FOR INSTANCE, WHO DOESN'T HAVE A SIDEWALK ACROSS HIS PROPERTY AND MAYBE DOESN'T WANT ONE. WE'RE APPROACHING HIM AND SAYING FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE TOWN CAN WE CONNECT THIS THROUGH? THAT WOULD BE A DECISION FOR FUTURE COUNCIL. UM SO TO ME, THIS IS KIND OF A SIMILAR. WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TWO ALMOST COMPONENTS HERE. ONE IS THE SUBDIVISION TO ME. I TREAT AS A DEVELOPMENT AND I WANT TO TREAT STANDARD WITH ANYBODY ELSE WHO SUBDIVIDE OR DOES ANYTHING AND WANT TO SUBJECT TO THE SAME? ASK. BUT YOUR REMAINDER PROPERTY. I DON'T WANT TO ASK ANYTHING OF YOU AND THE REMAINDER PROPERTY OTHER THAN THE COURTESY OF WOULD YOU LET US DO IT? AND SO I'M WILLING TO ENTERTAIN THIS IDEA OF CREDITS BECAUSE HE MAY NOT WANT THE SIDEWALK. THE INTERSECTION OF FLORENCE. YEAH, SEE SECOND CLOSE, BOTH ENDS OF THE SIDE OF THE ZOOM OUT ON. ON HIS PROPERTY YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT. AT 60. FT. DIDN'T WELL. YES SO, AS THE MAYOR SAID, IF WE WANT TO KEEP THE SAME STANDARD DOWN FLORENCE ROAD, IT DOES NEED TO BE A 60 FT. RIGHT AWAY IN THE SIDEWALK IS RIGHT AT THAT 60 FT LINE. ROOMS AND ARRANGE EVENTUALLY WHEN THE SIX LENGTH. UNDIVIDED AS WELL. THAT THINKS IS RIGHT. IT'LL BE THIS. WE'RE GONNA WE'RE GONNA END UP BECAUSE ROPES AND RANCH SOUTH OF ROPES AND RANCH DEVELOPMENT IS ALREADY A FOUR LINE UNDIVIDED. I THINK IT'S JUST EASIER TO FOLLOW THAT ALIGNMENT SIX SECTION. SO, COUNCILLORS.

WHERE ARE YOU ON THE CREDIT THING? AT THE MOMENT. FOR THE SIDEWALK 15,000 FOR THE SIDEWALK ACROSS THE RESIDUAL OF THE PROPERTY. WHERE YOU AT ON THAT PIECE OF THIS SHAPE PRESS.

HOW MUCH WAS THE SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF PRAIRIE VIEW? IT'S A LOT. YEAH BUT WE HAD TO MOVE.

[02:20:06]

UM WE HAD TO BUILD THE DRAINAGE CULVERT TO CONNECT IT BACK TO THE STREET. I THINK WE HAD, UH, WE HAD TO PUT A PAD AROUND THE FIRE HYDRANT. IT WAS. YEAH IT WAS MUCH MORE. THE POINT IS, IT IS A GOOD VALUE TRUE. I THINK THAT AD MAY HAVE BEEN. 50,000 BECAUSE OF THE COVERT AND THE RE GRADING AND ALL THAT STUFF. YES, SIR. OKAY? IS THIS? WHAT WAS THERE JUST ENDS IN BOTH DIRECTIONS? YEP. OKAY? BILL WE'RE YET I'M OK, OKAY. PROJECT. I'M NOT TWO ACRE LOTS TO BEGIN WITH. OKAY WE'LL TALK ABOUT THAT IN A SECOND, OKAY? ALL RIGHT. SO LET'S LET'S TALK ABOUT THIS. 30 60 FT. 60 FT IS WHAT START US HAS 30 FT IS WHAT THE COUNTER OFFER IS, UM. DO WE WANT TO NEGOTIATE FOR THE 60 OR WE SATISFIED WITH 30? I PERSONALLY NEED 60 THERE TO MAKE IT MATCH UP IN CASE OF FUTURE USE. THAT'S JUST MINE. MOST AS LONG AS I MEAN, I AGREE, BUT I WOULD SAY, LET'S NOT PUSH INTO HIS PROPERTY ANY FARTHER. LET'S JUST LET THOSE LOTS GET SMALLER WHEN WE NEED THEM TO GET SMALLER. BUY WHATEVER 30 FT LIKE WHOOP DE DO. OKAY I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING. THERE WE DON'T FORCES LOTS BACK NOW. LET THE WATCH ALREADY MOVED UP. BUT I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND GIVE YOU 30. I'M RIGHT. MAKE THEM 30 FT. BIG KNOW THAT YOU'RE YOU'RE RIGHT THERE, BUT. THAT WAY. WE DON'T HAVE TO ACQUIRE THE PROPERTY, AND WE JUST MAKE SURE THE SETBACKS ARE CORRECT IN HERE TO ACCOUNT FOR A 60 FT. SO WE GO FOR US. SURE I UNDERSTAND AND HELP. ACTUALLY WITH THIS. WE'RE GOING TO GET A 60 FT RIGHT AWAY. BUT WE'RE GOING TO THESE LOTS ARE NOW GOING TO BE 1.9. AND I HAVE A QUESTION TO ASK HER. WE, UM IS THAT CLOSE ENOUGH TO THE WHAT WE POSTED, OKAY? AND THEN MAKE SURE THE SETBACKS ACCOUNT FOR THAT 60 FT. I BELIEVE, YEAH, WE'LL HAVE A. WHAT ARE THE RIGHT AWAY? WHAT RIGHT AWAY? DOES THE TOWN OF NORTH LAKE HAVE ALONG THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF FLORENCE ROAD? IS IT 60 FT, ALL THE WAY UP AND DOWN. MHM FOR THE AREAS THAT WE HAVE PLANTED ITS, UH, ITS 120. LIKE THROUGH THE HIGHLANDS. YEAH BUT FOR AREAS WE THAT ARE STILL THE OLD PRESCRIPTIVE NOW. FLORENCE THROUGH, UM BETWEEN STRAIGHTER AND. PROCESS FOR ALL SEVEN MAY STILL ONLY BE 80 BECAUSE THAT WAS AT THAT TIME OF THAT PROJECT. ALL RIGHT, MR FRISBY. THE QUESTION IS BACK TO YOU THEN. SO IF WE'RE ASKING FOR 60, AND WE'RE NOT ASKING FOR YOU TO CUT DEEPER INTO YOUR PROPERTY.

DOES THAT MATTER TO YOU? IF THE LOTS ARE 19 INSTEAD OF TO WELL, TO GIVE US A 60 FT RIGHT AWAY IN ORDER TO MAKE THIS WORK, SO I GIVE YOU THE 60 FT. RIDE AWAY. YOU DON'T HAVE TO MOVE THE LINES ON WHICH YOU PROPOSED LINES BACK 30 FT. 30 MORE FEET. YOU DON'T HAVE TO MOVE THEM BACK. 30 MORE FEET. JUST KEEP THE LINE AS YOU COUNTER PROPOSED, OKAY. ADD ADDITIONAL, ADDING 30 FT. AND I DON'T HAVE TO BUILD THE SIDEWALK IN FRONT OF MY HOUSE WILL PAY FOR THAT.

YES. LUXURY HOUSES. THAT GET US THERE? YES, SIR. I WAS GONNA SAY IF THOSE SIDEWALKS WERE BUILT 60 FT. OFF THE CENTER LINE OF THE ROAD ANYWAY, ANYTHING ON THE WEST SIDE OF HIM ISN'T REALLY GOING TO BE USABLE BY THE HOMEOWNER ANYWAY, SO IT'S DEFACTO. WELL, WE CAN'T BUILD A SIDEWALK IF IT'S IF WE DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT OF WAY. ANOTHER AVENUE WOULD BE TO DO A SIDEWALK EASEMENT OUTSIDE OF THE 30 FT RIGHT AWAY. BUT NOW THAT IF WE GET THE 60 WILL HAVE PLENTY OF ROOM TO DO THE SIDEWALK. AND THE ULTIMATE FOUR LANES AND THE DRAINAGE, BUT HE'S GOING TO REQUIRE THAT OF HIS HOME BUILT. I MEAN OF THE PEOPLE WHO. ABOUT A LOT, SO YOU WON'T HAVE TO BUILD THOSE ALONG FLORENCE ANYWAY. OKAY, I'M. I THOUGHT YOU WERE CONFLATING THEM SO THE RIGHT AWAY WITH YES. SO. LOTS 12 AND THREE AS THEY'RE BUILT THAT A COUPLE, YOU KNOW, COME ON UPON COMPLETION BECAUSE YOU DON'T WANT ALL THE TRUCKS RUNNING OVER THAT WILL BE BUILT AS THEY'RE DEVELOPED. WE NEED TO DECIDE. WHO BUILDS IF YOU WANT TO DECIDE WHAT TO CONTINUE ON FLORENCE, WE CAN HAVE STRAIGHTER WE CAN HAVE MR FRISBY BUILT IT WITH HIS CONTRACTORS. OR WE COULD BUILD IT NOW THAT THAT RIGHT AWAY

[02:25:04]

ALREADY EXISTS. BUT BECAUSE OF THE EARLIER PROJECT, REMEMBER, HE USED TO HAVE A 15 ACRE TRACT, AND NOW IT'S 14.8 SO WE CAN GO THERE NOW WE DIG IN A LITTLE BIT. UM. ONCE WE GET, UH, CLOSER TO THE FLORENCE INTERSECTION ON STRAIGHTER, MR CORN. WHAT WOULD YOU RECOMMEND DO WE BUILD IT ON OUR OWN DIME WITH HIS PERMISSION, OR DOES HE BUILD IT WITH HIS CONTRACTOR WITH 15,000 CREDITS FROM US? WHAT IS THE BETTER? BETTER? I WOULD STRONGLY SO I KNOW YOU DIDN'T ASK ME. BUT I STRONGLY SUGGEST THAT WE DO WITH CREDITS AND HAVE HIM BUILD IT AND JUST SIGNING ANY AGREEMENTS AND HE'S WILLING WITH HIS CONTRACTORS. HE'S GOING TO BE ABLE TO SOURCE IT BETTER. HE'S ALREADY PRICED IT. HE'S HE'S GONNA BE HE'S GONNA BE A GREAT SUPERVISOR BECAUSE HE'S GOING TO BE THERE ON SITE $44,000 TO BUILD ALL THE SIDEWALKS. LET ME THROW A CURVEBALL AT YOU. IT SEEMS CURVEBALLS REALLY WERE BEATING US SIDEWALK THING. THE DEATH.

THIS IS FOR THE BENEFIT OF THE PEOPLE THAT STARTED US. HOW ABOUT THEY PAY FOR IT? HEY I DON'T KNOW IF WE HAVE A MECHANISM TO HAVE THEM PAY FOR SOMETHING OFF SITE. UM. IT'S APPARENTLY THEY WANTED TO. THEY COULD CONTINUE TO WALK. IT'S MORE JUST CONNECTIVITY WITH ALL OUR SYSTEMS, AND WE'RE STILL GOING TO HAVE TO GO TO THE PROPERTIES NORTH OF THERE AND WORK SOMETHING OUT. I WILL. WE'RE WE'LL ACQUIRE THAT, UM AS PART OF THE ROAD PROJECT AND WILL INCLUDE THAT SIDEWALK IN THE ROAD PROJECT, SO WE'LL HAVE A WE'LL HAVE A COMPLETE LOOP.

HOW WOULD YOU RATE YOUR FEAR? A FEEL ABOUT THAT, RIGHT? WELL, I MEAN, ULTIMATELY, I MEAN, IT'S HUGE. I SEE YOUR POINT. BUT AGAIN, IT'S NOT JUST START US. IT'S GOING TO BE THESE THREE NEW HOMEOWNERS. IT'S GOING TO BE YOU IF YOU WANTED TO RIDE YOUR BICYCLE DOWN THE SIDEWALK.

I'M JUST KIDDING. OR AND, YOU KNOW, JOSH ACRES HOUSE THAT WE CAN SEE IN THIS PICTURE AND HIS KIDS RIDING DOWN THAT SIDEWALK THAT CAN GO SOUTH NOW, INSTEAD OF JUST NORTH. AND WHATEVER GETS DEVELOPED ON THE PV PROPERTY, IF EVER RIGHT LIKE THAT'S THAT'S NOT JUST START UPS THAT EVERYBODY WHO HAS THE ACCESS TO THAT SIDEWALK. WE'LL GET TO USE. SO I FEEL LIKE WE'RE NEGOTIATING AGAINST OURSELVES A LITTLE BIT BECAUSE I FEEL LIKE HE AGREED TO WHAT WE TALKED ABOUT, CAN WE? ARE WE COMFORTABLE WITH? CHANGE IT. WE HAVE IT. WE HAVE YES. I'M FINE WITH THIS. I HAVE ONE QUICK QUESTION. YES DOES THE COUNTY ALREADY OWNED THE RIGHT OF WAY IN FRONT OF YOUR HOUSE? 60 FT OF IT. YES, OKAY. UNDER THE ONLY WAY WE'LL THE COUNTY. LET US PUT ASIDE. WALK THERE. WE HAVE TO ASK HIM. OKAY WE HAVE A GOOD ENOUGH RELATIONSHIP.

ACTUALLY IT'S OUR IT'S OUR RIGHT OF WAY. THEY BUILT THE PROJECT, BUT IT'S OUR RIGHT AWAY. WE ALREADY KNOW THROUGH. OKAY UM, I OWE YOU A MOMENT HERE BECAUSE YOU TOLD ME BEFORE. ANCHORAGE. WELL, LOOK. I'VE SAID I'M AGAINST ACREAGE WEST OF THOUGHT, AND I REMAIN THAT WAY HAS NOTHING TO DO. IT'S NOTHING PERSONAL AGAINST MR FRISBY. I DIDN'T VOTE FOR STARDUST. SO. FEEL LIKE I'VE HAD A CONSISTENT POSITION. I CAN DIVIDE MY PROPERTY INTO ONE ACRE PROPERTIES. JUST A T. J. CAN. ALRIGHT I OWED YOU THAT MOMENT TO BRING THAT BACK TOPIC BACK IN BECAUSE I KNOW YOU. THEY HAVE THAT POSITION. UM ALL RIGHT. SO WHAT AM I AGREEING.

TO? ASHLEY GOT IT. WELL UH, KIND OF WE KIND OF OUTLINED IT THE ORIGINAL RIGHT AWAY IN YOUR PACKET, THE ORIGINAL RIGHT AWAY. BUT. 1.9 ACRE LOTS ROUGHLY, UM AND NOT NOT REQUIRE THE TWO UM, COMPLETE SIDEWALK. BUT THE SECTION THROUGH MR FRISBEES PROPERTY WILL BE AN EQUAL AMOUNT OF CREDITS. AGREED. I AGREE WITH THAT. OF ROUGHLY $15,000. YES. WELL WE GOT A NUMBER OF THE AGREEMENT. SO CAN WE SAY $15,000, OKAY? UM. CAN WE TAKE A CAN WE TAKE A SHORT BREAK? WE'LL HANG ON. I'M SORRY. THAT'S JUST TRUE. BUT YES, I UNDERSTAND. YOU NEED TO WRITE THIS UP. CAN WE VERBALIZED THAT IN A DECISION BEFORE YOU GO RUN OFF AND HAVE OKAY ALL RIGHT NOW, HOW DO I NEED? HOW DO WE NEED TO VERBALIZE THAT SO WE CAN TAKE A VOTE? NOT WITH STILL WOULD STILL BE A PUBLIC HERE. DID NOT ON THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. GO, ONE MORE COMING UP. I THINK. THE TWO MAIN CHANGES FROM THE AGREEMENT AND FROM THE AGREEMENT IN YOUR PACKETS IS YOU'RE NOW GOING TO ALLOW THE ACRES TO GO DOWN TO 1.9. AND THAT WE'RE GOING TO PROVIDE CREDITS UP TO $15,000 FOR THE SIDEWALK SECTION

[02:30:01]

THROUGH HIS PROPERTY. OKAY REMAINING EIGHT ACRES ACRES. IT IS. LIKE THE NEW ACREAGE. ALL RIGHT. TODAY THE YES ALL RIGHT. SO LET ME SEE IF I CAN MOTIONLESS THEN TO GET US STARTED AND SEE IF THIS THIS THIS WORKS. I LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH MR FRISBY. WITH MR MR AND MRS FRISBY. ON THEIR PROPERTY. WE WITH THE SUBJECT TO THESE CHANGES TO OUR PACKET TO ALLOW FOR A 1.9 ACRE LOTS. 31.9 ACRE LOTS. AND THE PROVISION OF $15,000 IN CREDITS DO I NEED TO SPECIFY WHICH. SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY CREDITS FOR BUILDING UM AND THIS IS A MOTION TO APPROVE. IS THAT WHAT WE NEED? OKAY? IS THERE A SECOND? DID YOU WANT TO DO SOMETHING? LET'S LET'S DO VERBAL. SINCE THERE'S PROBLEMS WITH TOUCH SCREENS OVER THERE. IS THERE SOMEONE WHO WISHES THE SECOND DEMOLITION. MR BOYER IS A SECOND. ALL RIGHT. IS THERE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION HERE? DO WE UNDERSTAND WHAT WE'RE DOING? YOU CAN SIT DOWN, MR. FRISKY. THANK YOU. ONLY KEEP IT STANDING UP THERE. ALL RIGHT. NO FURTHER DISCUSSION. LET'S TAKE THE VOTE AUDIBLY. WE WILL SKIP THE VOTING SYSTEM. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. RAISE YOUR HAND. ALRIGHT. OPPOSED.

NO, OKAY. CHECKED HAVE FOUR AND THREE. WE HAVE PLACE TO THREE AND FIVE. OUR NOSE. SHOOTING 34 HIS PLACE 545 YOUR FOUR, OKAY? NEITHER. GOOD PERSON. OKAY? I'M NOT FOR. MENTALLY YOU'RE OKAY.

YOU GUYS KNOW. PLACE THREE POINTS. OKAY? YOU GOT THE ROLE. WE'RE GOOD 4 TO 3. IDENTIFY THEM, OKAY? CONGRATULATIONS, MR FRISBY. OKAY? UM WHY DON'T YOU TAKE CARE OF THAT BEFORE WE GO TO ITEM L AND LET ME, UH, DO WHAT WE NEED TO DO AN ITEM M ETCETERA. KEEP US GOING.

BARBARIC. GET WE CAN DO IT. YES, RIGHT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. COUNSELORS UM TO WHEN WE PUT

[5.M. Consider a Resolution casting Northlake's votes for a member or members of the Board of Directors of the Denton Central Appraisal District Resolution 21-39 (if needed)]

THIS ON THE AGENDA, WE EXPECTED A PACKET OF ALL THE RESUMES OF WHICH THERE'S A DOZEN OR MORE.

THOSE CAME IN TODAY. I BELIEVE IT IS. UM I DO HAVE A RECOMMENDATION FOR THIS PARTICULAR ITEM. THERE ARE SOME THINGS THAT THE APPRAISAL DISTRICT WHICH I'M SURE YOU'RE ALL AWARE OF ISSUES RELATED TO FINISHING THEIR APPRAISALS THIS YEAR, WHICH HAS BEEN ATROCIOUS.

UM THE SYSTEM THEY PUT IN PLACE FAILED DRAMATICALLY FOR EVERYONE. THERE'S CONCERNS ABOUT THE CONTINUATION OF THESE APPRAISALS LONG AFTER CERTIFYING, UH. THE ROLE WHICH THAT'S I'VE INSURED WITH. THE LEGALITIES ARE OF THAT, UM I THINK WE ALL HAVE X. HAVE SEEN SOME EXPRESSIONS OF FRUSTRATION WITH THE APPRAISAL PROCESS. THIS IS THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS THAT SUPERVISES THIS, AND THERE'S A LOT OF PEOPLE IN THE RUNNING FOR THIS ROLE. I'M NOT GOING TO RECOMMEND TO YOU, THE PERSON THAT I HAVE BEEN LOOKING TO ON THIS BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE ALL THOSE IN FRONT OF YOU TO MAKE A DECISION TONIGHT. MY RECOMMENDATION IS TO BRING THIS BACK TO YOU. IN DECEMBER. SO YOU HAVE A FAIR OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE ALL THE. HE BUT JUST GOT HIM THAT JUST CAME OUT, RIGHT? THAT'S RIGHT. THEY'RE PRINTED OUT IN FRONT OF YOU. AND TO THAT POINT I DON'T WANT TO USURP THE OPPORTUNITY FOR YOU TO VET THESE PEOPLE YOURSELF.

AND SO I THINK IT'S ONLY FAIR THAT I OFFERED THE OPPORTUNITY WITHOUT PITCHING SOMEONE. TO CONSIDER TAKING THIS UP AT THE DECEMBER MEETING, WHICH WE STILL HAVE TIME TO DO. WE HAVE TILL DECEMBER 15TH TO APPROVE THIS. WE HAVE BEEN INCREASED EIGHT VOTES, SO PARADE EIGHT VOTES OUT OF 5000. UM. I INTEND TO RECOMMEND TO OUR FUTURE STATE REPS ON A CHANGE TO THAT PARTICULAR PROCESSES BASED ON TAXATION. NOT BASED ON POPULATION. UM BUT THAT'S FOR ANOTHER DAY. SO THAT IS MY PROPOSAL TO YOU IS TO TABLE THIS UNTIL THE DECEMBER MEETING.

SO YOU HAVE TIME TO VIEW THE PACKET. AND AT THAT TIME, I'LL UH IF I'M STILL RECOMMENDING THE PERSON I WANT TO RECOMMEND THAT I'LL MAKE THE PITCH FOR THEM AT THAT TIME AND SEE WHERE YOU ALL ARE WITH THAT. BUT BETWEEN NOW AND THEN, PLEASE VET YOUR CANDIDATES. IS THAT ACCEPTABLE TO ALL OF YOU? OKAY? YES, I'LL TAKE IT. EMOTION TO TABLE FROM COUNCILLOR HARDIMAN L SECONDS. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. ALRIGHT. OPPOSED. VERY GOOD. THANK YOU. I HAVE NO RECOMMENDATION FOR YOU AND ITEM AND SEE EVENING. RELATED TO THE LOCAL AND PUBLIC HEALTH

[02:35:02]

EMERGENCY. WE KNOW IT CONTINUES AT THIS TIME. UM AND OBVIOUSLY THAT IS A SENSITIVE ISSUE.

THERE'S STILL FOLKS THAT ARE SUFFERING FROM THIS AND SO WE'LL LEAVE THAT OPEN AT YOUR CONSENT. WE DO NEED TO COME BACK TO ITEM L AND WE NEED TO GIVE THEM A CHANCE TO FINISH THIS PROCESS AND PAPERWORK. SO WITH YOUR GENERAL CONSENT, LET'S LET'S TAKE FIVE UNTIL THEY WERE ABLE TO CONCLUDE. AND EVERYBODY GOOD WITH THAT CONSENT. GOOD ALL RIGHT, FIVE MINUTES. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. SIX P.M. TESTING TESTING. CAN YU HEAR ME? ALL RIGHT, THERE IS

[5.L. Hold a Public Hearing and consider an Ordinance Zoning change from RR - Rural Residential (min. 5 acres lots) /CRO - Conservation Residential Overlay to RE-PD - Rural Estate Planned Development (min. 2 acre lots) for an approximately 14.2855-acre tract of land situated in the J.E. Anderson Survey, Abstract No. 22, generally located on the northeast corner of Florance Road and Strader Road/ Robson Ranch Road. Kenneth Frisby is the owner/applicant. Case # PD-21-003. i. Public Hearing ii. Ordinance No. 21-1028 C]

ALL RIGHT. WE'RE GONNA GET BACK TO OUR REGULAR DJINN. IT'S 8. 42 PM THANK YOU FOR YOUR PATIENTS. EVERYONE WHO'S HERE? UM, WE NEED TO DO ONE MORE ITEM TONIGHT. RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT. UM AND THAT'S ITEM L. AND WE NEED TO HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS, AND WE HAVE TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE ZONING CHANGE NOW. AH TO ENABLE THIS TO OCCUR FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL TO RURAL ESTATE PLAN DEVELOPMENT. DO WE NEED TO VERBAL CHANGE THE SAYS MINIMUM TWO ACRE LOTS ON THIS. ON THE AGENDA, SO ANY MOTION IS GOING TO HAVE TO INCLUDE THE CHANGE.

WE JUST MADE. OKAY? ALL RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. SO WE'VE BEEN OVER THIS ALREADY. SAME APPLICANT HERE. WE NEED TO DO A PUBLIC HEARING YOU OKAY? IF I GO AHEAD AND DO THAT? PART IS 8 43. PM OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ITEM L. FOR THE ZONING CHANGE FROM ER WAS ESSENTIAL TO RURAL ESTATE PLANNING DEVELOPMENT. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WE SHOULD SPEAK ON THIS TOPIC THIS EVENING? GOING ONCE GOING TWICE, OKAY? ALL RIGHT, WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ALSO AT 8 43 PM AT THIS TIME COUNSELORS AND ENTERTAIN YOUR DISCUSSION AND OR CONSIDERATION. IF YOU WANT TO GET OUT OF HERE, WE HAVE TO MAKE A DECISION ON THIS. OKAY.

I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE. AL SECONDS. OKAY. CAN YOU VERBALIZE THAT? MOTION TO APPROVE THAT 1.9 ACRES. ALRIGHT, I SECOND THAT MOTION. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE, UH THE PLAN DEVELOPMENT ALRIGHT ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION ON THIS TOPIC? ALL RIGHT. WE'LL DO VERBAL VOTE ALL THOSE IN FAVOR. SAY AYE. RAISE YOUR HAND. ALL RIGHT. THOSE OPPOSED NO NAME.

NEW YORK. OKAY, OKAY. THREE KNOWS. PLACE TO PLACE THREE AND PLACE FOR. ALL RIGHT. IT IS 8:44 P.M. O NEED TO RETIRE INTO EXECUTIVE SESSION TO. DISCUSS ACCORDING TO I DON'T REALLY HAVE ANYTHING NEW ON THE EXECUTIVE SESSION AT ALL. NOTHING'S REALLY CAME UP. VERY GOOD. I'M GOOD WITH THAT LAST. YEAH ALL RIGHT. SO OUR NEXT MEETING IS GOING TO BE THE SITE. CORRECT NOVEMBER 19TH AND 20TH AT THE OUTDOOR LEARNING CENTER. IT IS A PUBLIC MEETING AND YOU'LL HAVE YOUR SCHEDULES. NEXT MEETING IN COUNCIL CHAMBERS WILL BE DECEMBER 9TH.

OKAY THANK YOU AGAIN. THANK YOU VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. UH IF THERE'S NOTHING ELSE FROM ANYONE HERE BY GENERAL CONSENT, WE STAND ADJOURNED, SAY 45 P. M. EVERYBODY. GOOD? YES. ALL RIGHT. GOOD NIGHT. THANK YOU. YES SIR. JUST TELL Y'ALL APPRECIATE YOUR DILIGENCE AND YOUR COMPROMISE AND YOU'RE. BUILD SEMI A HOUSE.

* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.

1. Call to Order

2.A. Recognition - Texas Municipal Court Week - November 1-5,2021

2.B. Presentation - FY 21 Quarterly Investment Report

2.C. Presentation - FY 21 Quarterly Finnacial Report

2.D. Briefing - Harvest Retail Area: Town Limit and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Adjustments

4. Consent Items

5.J. Hold a Public Hearing and consider a Ordinance amending the 2016 Master Thoroughfare Plan at the intersection of Strader and Florance. The amendment would maintain the current offset T-intersection and remove the future conventional four-way intersection with the reserve S-curve from the plan.

5.K. Proposed Development Agreement with Kenneth and Cathy Frisby related to an approximately 14.2855-acre tract of land situated in the 5.J.E. Anderson Survey, Abstract No. 22, generally located on the northeast corner of Florance Road and Strader Road/ Robson Ranch Road

5.M. Consider a Resolution casting Northlake's votes for a member or members of the Board of Directors of the Denton Central Appraisal District Resolution 21-39 (if needed)

Oct 28, 2021 Town Council

1. Call to Order

2.A. Recognition - Texas Municipal Court Week - November 1-5,2021

2.B. Presentation - FY 21 Quarterly Investment Report

2.C. Presentation - FY 21 Quarterly Finnacial Report

2.D. Briefing - Harvest Retail Area: Town Limit and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Adjustments

4. Consent Items

5.J. Hold a Public Hearing and consider a Ordinance amending the 2016 Master Thoroughfare Plan at the intersection of Strader and Florance. The amendment would maintain the current offset T-intersection and remove the future conventional four-way intersection with the reserve S-curve from the plan.

5.K. Proposed Development Agreement with Kenneth and Cathy Frisby related to an approximately 14.2855-acre tract of land situated in the 5.J.E. Anderson Survey, Abstract No. 22, generally located on the northeast corner of Florance Road and Strader Road/ Robson Ranch Road

5.M. Consider a Resolution casting Northlake's votes for a member or members of the Board of Directors of the Denton Central Appraisal District Resolution 21-39 (if needed)

Oct 28, 2021 Town Council

Link

Social

Embed

Download

Download Selected Item