[5A. Hold a public hearing regarding the proposed annexaon of approximately 1.157 acres of Dale Earnhardt Way right-of-way from State Highway 114 to approximately 300 feet north of Northport Drive within the Town's exclusive extraterritorial jurisdicon (1st Required Public Hearing; 2nd Required Public Hearing set for March 23, 2023; Final Considera&on set for April 13, 2023)]

ABSENT. OKAY FIRST ACTION ITEM IN THE EVENING IS ACTION ITEM A . WE'RE GOING TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING IN HERE IN A MOMENT, BUT MR CORN WHEN SHE WALKS US THROUGH THIS ONE, THIS IS A SHORT PORTION OF RIGHT OF WAY ALONGSIDE DALE EARNHARDT DOWN NEAR 1 14. AND WE'RE LOOKING TO ANNEX THAT PARTICULAR PIECE OF THE ROADWAY FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPROVING IT, MR CORN, SO WE WERE KIND OF GONE OVER THIS BEFORE ABOUT WHO OWNS THE ROAD WHO CAN REPAIR IT? WHO CAN ENFORCED SPEED LIMITS ON IT? THIS DOESN'T WANT ONE OF THOSE SITUATIONS WHERE HALF THE ROADS IN NORTH LIKE THE OTHER HALF IS IN THE COUNTY. SO WE'VE GOT OTHER EXAMPLES OF THAT WERE RECENTLY WE ANNEXED, FOUGHT BECAUSE THE NORTHERN HALF WAS IN THE TOWN IN THE SOUTHERN HOUSE THAT WAS IN THE COUNTY COUNTY HAS HAD A BIT OF SHIFT AND THEIR PARTNERSHIP WITH US AND SO WE'VE BEEN SLOWLY TAKING OVER THESE ROADS. THIS IS JUST ANOTHER EXAMPLE. THIS IS DOWN AT 1, 14 AND DELAHUNT WAY NORTH OF 1 14. WE'RE LOOKING AT POTENTIAL EXPANSION OF THIS AND IN ORDER TO DO THIS. WE WANT TO GET THIS ROAD ALL IN THE TOWN OF NORTH LAKE. THIS IS THE FIRST HEARING THERE'LL BE A SECOND HEARING ON THE 23RD. AND THEN YOU'RE FOR YOUR FINAL CONSIDERATION. ANNEX ON THE 13TH. WE HAVE RECEIVED THE COURT COMMISSIONERS COURTS. UM ORDER THAT, UM, THAT CONCEDES THIS ALLOWS FOR OUR ANNEXATION OF THIS. THAT'S ONE OF THE STEPS REQUIRED UNTIL WE RECEIVED THAT.

SO WE WE'VE MET ALL THE CONDITIONS AND SO NOW BY STATE STATUTE, WE NEED TO HOLD TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS ONE TONIGHT, ONE IN A COUPLE OF WEEKS. ALRIGHT COUNSELORS HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR COYNE? I'LL ADD. HE REFERENCED IN A COUPLE OF YOU DON'T HAVE TO STAY UP THERE.

IT'S OKAY YOUR REFERENCE A COUPLE OF TIMES PARTNERSHIP WITH THE COUNTY, SO THE PARTNERSHIP OF THE COUNTY HAS BEEN FORMALIZED AND JUST GIVE YOU THE BULLET POINTS OF IT. THEY HAVE A COUPLE OF PROJECTS IN THE TOWN THAT THEY'RE TAKING ON IN FULL OR LARGELY IN FULL. ACROSS OUR TOWN, AND THEN THERE'S MANY ROADS IN OUR TOWN THAT ARE PART IN THE TOWN AND PART NOT IN THE TOWN. THIS IS ONE OF THOSE AND FOR ADMINISTRATIVE PURPOSES AND OPERATIONAL IMPROVEMENT AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT WERE SLOWLY TAKING THOSE OVER. THIS IS ONE STEP AND ASKED, TAKING CARE OF OUR OWN DESTINY. BUT IT DOESN'T MEAN THOUGH, IS THAT WE CAN'T STILL CONTINUE TO GO INTO PARTNERSHIPS WITH THE COUNTY FOR FUNDING FOR THESE ROADS. OR SEEK OTHER SUPPORT FOR IT. SO WE'RE STILL WE HAVE A LONG LIST OF MONEY. LIKE I SAID, THEY'RE THE POT OF MONEY THAT WE'RE WORKING WITH. THEY HAVE A 50 50 PROGRAM WITH US UP TO $15 MILLION OF OUR MONEY AND 50 MILLION OF THEIRS.

AND THEN THERE'S ANOTHER PART OF PROJECTS THAT THEY'RE WORKING ON FOR US THAT ARE PROBABLY IN THE $15 MILLION RANGE. SO IT'S LIKE WE'RE GETTING NO. WE'RE PAYING ABOUT 33 CENTS ON THE DOLLAR FOR THE PACKAGE OF ROADS WERE WORKING ON WITH THE COUNTY. SO THAT'S THAT'S WHERE WE'LL BE FOR THE NEXT COUPLE OF YEARS. THIS IS A PLACE WHERE WE COULD POTENTIALLY USE IT. WE CAN POTENTIALLY USE IT IN OTHER PLACES. IT DOESN'T HAVE TO BE ON EACH INDIVIDUAL PROJECT. WE CAN DO ONE. THEY CAN DO ONE FOR KIND OF TIDY PURPOSES, BUT THIS DOESN'T PRECLUDE US FROM CONTINUING TO GO FORWARD TO FIND FINANCING TO BUILD THIS SECTION OF ROAD. IT JUST PUTS IT IN OUR COURTS SO WE CAN DO THE PROJECT BECAUSE ULTIMATELY WHEN WE DO A COUNTY PROJECT TYPICALLY, WE'RE

[00:45:02]

GOING TO END UP EXECUTING THE PROJECT TO IMPROVE THAT ROAD WITHIN THE TOWN OF NORTH LAKE RATHER THAN HAVE THE COUNTY DO IT, DEPENDING ON THE NATURE OF THE PROJECT, BUT MOST OF THE PROJECTS I EXPECT WILL BE COUNTY ASSISTANCE WORKING WITH US TO DO ROADS, SO THIS IS A STEP IN THAT DIRECTION OF US TAKING ON OUR OWN FUTURE. THAT'S A LITTLE SOMETHING EXTRA TO ADD TO THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT. ALL RIGHT. LET'S UH LET'S HAVE OUR FIRST BUSINESS, THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING. HERE WE GO, OKAY? I'M LOOKING AT ITEM BE ALREADY AND IT'S KIND OF CONFUSING, FLIPPING THE PAGE HERE, SO FIRST PUBLIC HEARING DO YOU HAVE SOMETHING? OKAY ALRIGHT. IT IS 6 15 PM. IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THE TOPIC OF ACTION ITEM. A ANNEXATION OF THIS DALE EARNHARDT RIGHT AWAY. YES. I WOULD SAY THAT BASED ON THE INFORMATION THAT I GLEANED FROM TOWN HALL ONE OH ONE ABOUT OUR INTERGOVERNMENTAL PARTNERSHIPS IN OUR ROAD DEVELOPMENT THAT I SUPPORT DREW'S IDEA. THAT'S ALL , I CAN YOU CAN YOU STATE YOUR NAME FOR THE RECORD? I ALEXANDRA HOLMES. THANK YOU. RIGHT ANY OTHERS TONIGHT? ONCE GOING TWICE . ALRIGHT 6. 16 PM WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING ON ACTION ITEM A. ALRIGHT, ACTION NMB. THIS ONE IS A LARGE ONE, UM

[5B. Consider an Ordinance of the Town of Northlake, Texas, amending Arcle 9.03, Division 2 of the Code of Ordinances; adopng land use assumpons, capital improvements plans, and impact fees for water and sanitary sewer facilies]

LET'S SEE. I'M TRYING TO SUMMARIZE THIS. ALL RIGHT. SO THIS IS THE ORDINANCE ADOPTING OUR LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN IMPACT FEES FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWER FACILITIES, PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN WE CAN DISCUSS MR CORN THINK WE NEED AN OVERVIEW THIS ONE AS WELL. YES LET'S JUST GO BACK TO THE HISTORY. WE ENGAGED HALF ASSOCIATES AND ALSO, UH, NUGENT STRATEGIES TO LOOK AT OUR IMPACT FEES THEY NEED TO BE UPDATED EVERY FIVE YEARS PER STATE STATUTE. WE USED OUR P AND Z COMMISSION, BUT WE ADDED A RESIDENT FROM THE T. J THAT MET SECRETARY REQUIREMENTS TO CREATE THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE. THAT COMMITTEE REVIEWED OUR LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND OUR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN AND RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF FINAL DRAFT. YOU WERE BRIEFED THAT FINAL DRAFT AT THE FEBRUARY 9TH MEETING, AND THERE WERE SOME COMMENTS MADE. WE WENT BACK AND RAN THE NUMBERS. THERE WASN'T A. THE IT DIDN'T MOVE THE NEEDLE. THERE WASN'T ENOUGH OF A CHANGE TO CHANGE ANY OF THE RECOMMENDATIONS. AS EXPLAINED TO THE MAYOR, WE HAD SOME SMALL CHANGES IN POPULATION BUT TO GO FROM A 12 INCH PIPE TO A 15 INCH PIPE IS A IS A LARGER INCREMENTS , AND IT DIDN'T REALLY MOVE.

MOVE THAT. SO UH, STILL MOVING FORWARD WITH THAT WE HAVE RECEIVED A LETTER FROM THE CHAIR OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WHICH IS ACTUALLY AARON FOWLER. HE WAS CHAIR OF THAT COMMITTEE IS HERE TONIGHT, AND SO AND WE HAVE THE EXPERTS HERE AS WELL. WE HAVE PRESS BILLARD WITH HALF ASSOCIATES IN MATTHEW GARRETT WITH NUGENT STRATEGIES. SO, UH UM THEY'LL BE GETTING GLAD TO GO INTO ANY QUESTIONS YOU REQUIRED BY STATE LAW TO HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING ON THIS AND YOU ARE ABLE TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF IT IF YOU SO CHOOSE. COUNSELOR. DO YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR CORN? BEFORE WE HAVE A PUBLIC HEARING. MR FOWLER, DO YOU WANT TO SPEAK AT A PUBLIC HEARING IN SECOND? MAYBE SAY A FEW WORDS JUST PUT US ON THE RECORD WITH YOUR LETTER. JUST GIVE US THE BULLET POINTS OF WHICH, WHAT'S ON YOUR LETTER, AND MAYBE 30 SECONDS OF WHAT YOU DID, YOU KNOW, DESCRIBE THE PROCESS YOU WENT THROUGH AND ALL THAT. JUST HANG ON A SECOND.

BUT THIS IS THIS IS A LARGE DOCUMENT SO WE CAN'T EXACTLY GO THROUGH. AND LOOK AT THIS IN DETAIL WITH YOU THIS EVENING IN THE MEETING, BUT THAT'S THAT'S FOR US TO DO ON OUR OWN TIME COMING INTO THIS MEETING. AND I THINK I THINK THERE'S A THOROUGH JOB SO WE WILL LEAVE IT AT THAT UNLESS COUNSELORS HAVE SOMETHING AT THE OUTSET BEFORE THE PUBLIC HEARING, BUT WE'LL HAVE THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR HERE FIRST. SO WE'LL GET STARTED HERE AT 6. 19 PM WILL HOLD THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THEN WE CAN CONSIDER ACTION. SO IS THERE ANYONE THAT WISHES TO SPEAK ON THE TOPIC OF THIS ITEM TONIGHT. PLEASE. ALL RIGHT. WE HAVE YOU COME DOWN HERE. IF YOU DON'T MIND. SORRY TO PUT YOU ON THE SPOT, BUT I THINK IT'S IMPORTANT AS THE CHAIR. SORRY I KNOW. I KNOW. SO JUST TELL US JUST TELL US A LITTLE BIT ABOUT WHAT YOU WENT THROUGH TO GET TO THIS POINT WITH NUGENT AND, UH, YOU KNOW, GIVE US YOUR RECOMMENDATION IN THE 32ND VERSION. ALRIGHT BRIEF

[00:50:01]

AS I CAN. THANK YOU FOR HAVING ME UP THERE AGAIN. MY NAME IS AARON FOWLER ON THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADVISORY COMMITTEE. WE WERE PRESENTING SOME INFORMATION FROM HALF ASSOCIATES IN NEW GIN FEW MEETINGS AGO. IT WAS A LOT OF INFORMATION, LOT OF NUMBERS. WE TRIED TO HIS BEST WE COULD. AT THAT TIME. I DID THINK WE ASKED FOR SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, AND THEN WE CAME BACK AND MET AGAIN EARLY FEBRUARY. I BELIEVE THAT'S CORRECT. IT WAS EARLY FEBRUARY.

UM AND LIKE YOU SAID, WHAT WE CAME TO CONCLUSION WAS THE MATH WAS THE MATH. THE NUMBERS REALLY DIDN'T CHANGE MUCH. UM SO WHAT? WE FELT COMFORTABLE AFTER A LOT OF DELIBERATION. WE JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE WERE NOT RUBBER STAMPING THIS. WE FELT COMFORTABLE WITH THE PRESENTATION THAT HAVE DEAD FOR US. WE DID ASK QUITE A FEW QUESTIONS WE DISCUSSED AMONGST EACH OTHER. UM SOME DIFFERENT SCENARIOS. ONE SCENARIO BEING A PHASE IN MODEL ONE SCENARIO BEING JUST ALLOWING THE MAXIMUM FEES. WE CHOSE TO GO WITH THE MAXIMUM FEES TO BASICALLY HELP LOWER THE UTILITY RATE IMPACTS FOR EXISTING CUSTOMERS TO MEET THE DEMANDS. UM AND ALSO UNDERSTANDING THAT IF WE SET THE MAXIMUM THEY COULD BE LOWERED BY YOU IF YOU CHOOSE TO LATER ON.

BUT IF WE SET A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF THE RECOMMENDED AMOUNT, AND THAT'S WHAT YOU VOTED TO GO THROUGH FOUR AT A LOWER RATE THAN WE WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO RAISE THOSE LATER ON. UM SO THAT'S KIND OF WHAT WE DECIDED TO GO THROUGH AGAIN. WE FELT COMFORTABLE WITH THE INFORMATION. WE DID DISCUSS QUITE A BIT DURING THOSE MEETINGS. UM AND THAT'S KIND OF HOW THE PROCESS WENT. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR FOWLER? ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU FOR COMING DOWN. I APPRECIATE IT VERY MUCH. ALL RIGHT. THE FLOOR IS STILL OPEN FOR ANYONE IN THE PUBLIC HEARING. YES, MA'AM. OKAY, NOW JUST. THE HEART OF AN NSAID. ONE QUICK QUESTION. IF YOU WOULDN'T MIND IN OPEN SESSION JUST ENCAPSULATING THE ADOPTION OF THE LAND USED ASSUMPTIONS THAT PART OF THIS DOCUMENT IF YOU COULD JUST STATE THAT FOR THE RECORD, I APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. ANY OTHERS TONIGHT. OKAY ALRIGHT. IT'S 6. 22 PM WILL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. MR. KWAN, CAN YOU HELP US WITH THAT QUESTION? YES I STARTED. SO THE LAND YOU SEVEN SINS WERE BASED OFF THE COUNCIL'S COMMON PLAN. WE ASKED THE SEE A C AS MEMBERS OF THE COMMUNITY TO CHECK THE REASONABLE NOUS OF THE LAND. USE ASSUMPTIONS. UM LIKE I SAID, THEY'RE BASED OFF THE COUNCILS. UM 24 2040 IS THE HORIZON FOR THE COM PLAN. THE COMPLAINT WAS ADOPTED IN 2018.

THE COMMITTEE FELT THAT IT STILL REPRESENTED THE GROWTH AND THE. THE PARTICULAR USAGE AND THOSE AREAS. REMEMBER OUR COMPLAINT HAS A VERY LARGE RANTS PRESERVATION AREA, WHICH IS THIRD OF OUR LAND MASS, ACTUALLY THE SIZE OF THE ENTIRE TOWN OF ARGYLL. AND OF COURSE, WE HAVE INDUSTRIAL AREAS IN THE SOUTH AND ALONG THE QUARTER OF 35. WE HAVE THE NEIGHBORHOOD CHARACTER AREA, SO UM, THAT WAS THE ASSUMPTIONS AND THAT'S WHAT THE COMMITTEE LOOKED LIKE. LOOKED AT. AND AGREED WITH THOSE ASSUMPTIONS. CAN YOU DESCRIBE TRANSITIONAL MARKET DEPENDENT? IT'S THE AREAS WEST OF 1 56. WHAT'S THE EXPECTATION? THAT WAS THE LEAST DEFINITION? WE HAD THE LEAST WE KNEW ABOUT THAT? IT'S MORE OF A, UM ALMOST A PLACEHOLDER. IT'S NOT IN THE 10 YEAR PLANNING. YOU SO THAT'S ANOTHER ASPECT OF THIS. WE ONLY LOOK OUT 10 YEARS IN THOSE AREAS WEREN'T ANTICIPATED. TO HAVE ANY ACTIVITY IN THOSE BUT THAT'S REALLY A CATCH ALL MAYOR. IT COULD BE. IT COULD BE RESIDENTIAL. IT COULD BE COMMERCIAL. IT WAS MARKET DEPENDENT, AND THOSE WERE AREAS WE HAD RECENTLY ACQUIRED FROM FROM JUSTIN AND FOOT WORTH AND SOME OF OUR UM, NEGOTIATIONS WITH THEM. SO THAT'S BASICALLY AND UNKNOWN AT THIS POINT, BUT IT'S NOT PART OF THAT 10 YEAR PLANNING PERIOD. SIMILARLY THE TRANSITIONAL MIXED USE THAT'S IN BLUE THAT'S CURRENTLY ALL KIND OF RANCH LAND. AND THAT'S NORTH OF THE TEXAN. OUR SPEEDWAY.

THERE'S A LITTLE BIT NORTH OF THAT, AND IT'S A LITTLE BIT NORTH OF NORTH OF THE ACTUAL FLOODPLAIN. SO WE HAVE A WE HAVE AN UPDATED. UM WE HAVEN'T UPDATED MASTER PLAN ON THAT THAT WE USED YOU. YOU DID A REVISION TO THAT, BECAUSE WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FOSTER TRACK THAT WE CAN IN TRACK AND SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH HILLWOOD. THAT'S ALL BEEN MOVED TO INDUSTRIAL. AND SO THAT'S THAT LANDING. USE ASSUMPTION. UM. AND SO THAT THAT

[00:55:05]

ACTUALLY HAS BEEN CHANGED WHEN WE, UM WE ACTUALLY USED THE PORTION OF THAT THAT'S KIND OF NORTH OF THE FLOODPLAINS, SO I WOULD ASSUME THAT'S NOT GOING TO END UP. THAT THAT'S NOT MARKED ON HERE IS BUSINESS PARK THAT'S MARKED ON HERE IS TRANSITIONAL NEXT YEAR, SO RIGHT AND IN THE FLOODPLAIN IS NOT REALLY GOING TO BE. NO YEAH, AND IT'LL, UH, IT YEAH, THERE'S QUITE A BIT OF FLOODPLAIN THERE. THERE'S NOT GOING TO BE MUCH ROOM 11 71 WILL COME THROUGH THERE. THERE MAY BE SOME TYPE OF SMALL RETAIL, BUT IT WILL BE MORE KIND OF GREEN SPACE AND WE HAVE A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. PLANS. AND WE'RE IN THE BEGINNING OF OUR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN WILL HAVE A VISIONING SESSION WITH THE COUNCIL P AND Z AND BOTH DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SO WELL BEGINNING YOU'LL BE BEGINNING THAT PROCESS TO UPDATE THE COM PLANT. I'M JUST COMPARING SOME POPULATION PROJECTIONS BETWEEN TOTAL POPULATION, WATER AND SEWER AREAS, SEEING ABOUT IT DIFFERENCE ABOUT 3100 CUSTOMERS BETWEEN WATER AND SEWER. ON THE PROJECTIONS, WHICH DOES MAKE SOME SENSE WITH THE ONE ACRE COMMUNITIES IN THE RURAL AREAS. SO IT MAKES SOME SENSE. UM OKAY? COUNSELORS WHAT ELSE DO YOU HAVE TOURING FOR ANYONE? OH I'M SORRY THAT WE NEED WE DO NEED TO CLOSE. DID I NOT CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING? I DID. OKAY. SORRY. ALL RIGHT, SO THE BIG QUESTION OF THE DAY IS FACING. SO THAT WAS A BIG QUESTION THAT THE BOARD WENT THROUGH. YES, YOU HEARD FROM THE CHAIR. THE THOUGHT PROCESS FROM THEM WAS PUT IT AT THE TOP AND GIVE US THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADJUST THAT. KNOWING THAT ANY ADJUSTMENTS WE MAKE IS MONEY LOST TO DEDICATE TO OUR INFRASTRUCTURE. THE FLIP SIDE IS THAT IN THE EARLY DAYS RIGHT NOW, IT MAKES IT SIGNIFICANTLY MORE EXPENSIVE TO BRING NEW NEW DEVELOPMENT ONLINE. THAT'S NOT OUR STRATEGY , WHICH I IMAGINE YOUR OPINIONS ON THAT. UM BUT ALSO OPINIONS ON FULFILLING YOUR UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE. UH WE DO NOT RECOVER ALL THE FUNDS NECESSARY TO BUILD OUR INFRASTRUCTURE THROUGH THESE FEES. BUT THIS IS A CONTRIBUTION FACTOR. SO UM, YOU HAVE SOME STRATEGY AND SOME AND ONE THING, I WOULD ADD THAT THEY THE COMMITTEE. UM AND WE TOLD THEM THIS YOU YOU HAVE ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS, AND THERE IS A SYSTEM FOR CREDITS. AND REIMBURSEMENTS IF THEY BUILD OUR INFRASTRUCTURE, SO AND YOU ALSO HAVE THE POWER TO GO BELOW WHAT THE RECOMMENDATION IS SO YOU YOU'RE YOU'RE ABLE TO DO THAT. BUT YOU'RE ALSO ABLE TO DO IT ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS. SO THAT WAS I THINK THAT WAS WHAT THE CHAIR WAS TRYING TO COMMUNICATE. KEEP IT AT THE MAX, AND THEN YOU DETERMINE ON A CASE BY CASE BASIS IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO BRING THAT DOWN, OR DO SOME TYPE OF REIMBURSEMENT OR CREDIT TO THAT. AND COUNCIL. THERE'S I THINK THERE'S A FEW BASIS FOR CONSIDERATION FOR LOWERING NOT VERY OFTEN BECAUSE THE PRICE OF INFRASTRUCTURE KEEPS GOING UP.

BUT IF THE PRIVATE PRICE OF INFRASTRUCTURE THAT'S ESTIMATED HERE OR FOR SOME REASON TO COME DOWN, OR A SIGNIFICANT PART OF IT WAS BUILT. UH LONG BEFORE SOME OF THESE WERE PROJECTED FOR THEIR PROJECTED PRICE POINTS. WE MIGHT HAVE SOME BUILT UP PRESERVING THE SYSTEM AS FAR AS SOME SAVINGS ON THESE, BUT GIVEN WHAT WE'VE SEEN IN UTILITY PROJECTS, I MEAN, NOT EXACTLY EXPECTING ANY ESPECIALLY SINCE THIS DOESN'T CUT. THIS DOESN'T COVER ALL OF IT. BUT I DIDN'T KNOW THAT THERE ARE SOME PRETTY WILD DIFFERENCES IN THE ZONES FOR THE SAME TYPE OF FOR USES, AND SO, FROM A FAIRNESS AND EQUITY STANDPOINT, I THINK THAT THAT'S WHEN THAT COULD COME UP.

IN TERMS OF A PROJECT TRULY DIDN'T MAKE SENSE THAT THEY WEREN'T USING AS MUCH OF ROADS AND ALL THAT KIND OF PROJECT WOULD BE LOOKING AT. BUT THERE ARE THERE ARE A COUPLE VARIABLES HERE. THERE'S SOME PRETTY ASTOUNDING ESTIMATIONS THAT GO INTO THIS KIND OF STUFF. SO AS WE GO ALONG IF WE'RE PRETTY FAR AWAY FROM WHERE THESE PROJECTIONS LIE AND FEW OUT YEARS, UM WE GIVE OURSELVES A LITTLE BIT OF ROOM. IF WE COME IN AND PUT THESE AT THE TOP, AND THEN WE FIGURE OUT WHAT NEEDS TO BE DONE AT THAT TIME. FAIRNESS AND EQUITY IS IMPORTANT, BUT FAIRNESS AND EQUITY TO THOSE THAT LIVE HERE IS OUR PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITY. UM SO WE HAVE TO START THERE AND THEN, BUT IT'S NOT A MATTER OF TRYING TO GOUGE NEW DEVELOPERS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. IF THEY HAVE THE RIGHTS TO BUILD SOMETHING, OR YOU'VE APPROVED THEM TO BUILD SOMETHING , MAKING SURE THAT THE PRICE POINTS ARE EQUITABLE WITH THE MARKET AND EQUITABLE WITH WHAT THE COST TO BUILD THE INFRASTRUCTURE TO SERVE THEM. UH AND OF COURSE WE NEGOTIATE AS

[01:00:05]

BEST WE CAN SOMETIMES ADDITIONS TO PROJECTS IF THERE UH, IF THEY WANT TO CONCESSION OF ANY KIND, THEN THEY HAVE TO PAY IT FOR MORE SOMETIMES FOR OTHER OTHER TYPES OF CONTRIBUTIONS, SO THAT YOU'VE GOT A LOT OF VARIABLES TO WORK WITH. UM BUT I LIKE WHERE THE BOARD CAME IN WITH THEIR RECOMMENDATION. AND SO THOSE ARE MY THOUGHTS ON THE MATTER. UM I'M NOT GETTING INTO TOO MUCH OF THIS. THERE'S SO MANY OF THESE PROJECTS THAT I LOOK AT, AND I TRY TO TRY TO THINK THROUGH SOME OF THE PRICE POINTS AND MAKE SURE SOME OF THE ESTIMATION MAKES SENSE. SOME OF THEM ARE PRETTY ASTOUNDING IN TERMS OF EXPENSE, AND SOME OF THEM ARE OKAY. THAT MAKES A LOT OF SENSE.

SOME OF THEM ARE A LITTLE SCARED THAT MAYBE I'M NOT BE ENOUGH IN LIGHT OF CURRENT TRAJECTORY. BUT I THINK THERE'S A FEW ON EITHER SIDE OF THE LINE. SO MY HOPE IS THAT I WILL LAND IN THE MIDDLE DEFINITELY EVOLVED THE YOU KNOW. PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COSTS LINES THAT ON HERE THEY ALL HAVE A BUILT IN INFLATION AT 4% FOR PERCENT, SO THAT'S CORRECT. AND IF IT'S IF IT'S IN YEAR EIGHT OR NINE OR 10, IT'S GOING TO HAVE ALL THAT. INFLATION TACKED ON AND COMPOUNDING SO KIND OF BE COGNIZANT OF WHERE IT FALLS IN THAT 10 YEAR TIME PERIOD. I DON'T HAVE ANY MORE TO SAY ABOUT THIS COUNSELORS. I'M I'M IN SUPPORT OF ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDATION FROM FROM THE COMMITTEE. AND FROM THE STUDY. UM I'M NOT GOING TO GO THROUGH EACH INDIVIDUAL PRICE POINT, BUT SOME OF THESE DO GO UP QUITE A BIT. BUT AS WE'VE SEEN, THE UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE HAS GONE UP QUITE A BIT, AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE WE COVER OUR BASES FOR THE PROJECTS THAT WE'RE GOING TO BE COMPELLED TO HAVE TO BUILD HERE SOON. FURTHER. BROTHER COMMENTARY ANYBODY MY WAY IN THERE? OKAY WE'RE OPEN FOR CONSIDERATION. MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE BASED ON RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE. ALL RIGHT. I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE BY THE MAYOR PRO TEM HAVE A SECOND BY COUNCILOR GANZ. ALRIGHT LET'S THERE'S FURTHER DISCUSSION. YOU'RE FREE TO VOTE. ALRIGHT THE VOTE IS SIX OUT OF SIX WITH ONE ABSENT.

[5C. Consider an Ordinance of the Town of Northlake, Texas, amending the Code of Ordinances and Appendix "A"; Impact fees (A4.003), and Roadway impact fee schedule (A6.003)]

ALRIGHT ITEMS C ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF NORTH LIKE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND APPENDIX, A IMPACT FEES AND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE SCHEDULE IS IT'S JUST AN UPDATE, UM ENSURE. YEP. STEP TO JUST MAKE SURE WE'RE THAT WE HAVE OUR. THE SCHEDULE AND I THINK WE, UH, WE DID NOT. GET THE ROADWAY IMPACT FEES THAT WE RECENTLY ADOPTED. WE NEEDED THIS SECOND STEP TO, UM CODIFY IT, TOO, FOR THOSE FEES, SO THIS REFLECTS THE RECENT ROAD IMPACT FEES THAT YOU UPDATED AS WELL AS A WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEES. SO YOU APPROVE THE FEES. NOW WE NEED TO UPDATE THE ORDINANCE THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND CODIFIED THESE FEES IN OUR TABLES. NEWS TABLES REFLECT WHAT WE JUST ADOPTED. CORRECT. YES, SIR. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. VERY GOOD COUNSELORS, YOUR DISCUSSION OR YOUR OPEN PROMOTIONS. ALRIGHT, I'LL GO AHEAD AND MAKE THE MOTION FOR A SECOND. HAVE A SECOND FROM COUNCILOR KICKER. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION. I THINK THIS IS PRETTY PRETTY BENIGN. WE PASSED IT AND THEN WE GOT TO QUALIFY IT. OKAY, LET'S VOTE. ALRIGHT. THE VOTE IS SIX OUT OF

[5D. Consider a Resoluon of the Town of Northlake, Texas authorizing parcipaon in certain cooperave purchasing programs in accordance with the Town's Procurement Policy; idenfying those cooperave purchasing programs; authorizing the Town Manager to execute any and all necessary agreements for parcipaon and approving related contracts]

SIX WITH ONE ABSENT. NEXT ITEM. RESOLUTION OF THE TOWN OF NORTHLAKE AUTHORIZING PARTICIPATION PARTICIPATION IN CERTAIN COOPERATIVE PURCHASING PROGRAMS, MR CORN THIS IS A THIS IS ANOTHER. HOUSEKEEPING UM, CATCH ALL WE DIDN'T LIST ALL THE VARIOUS INTER LOCAL AGREEMENTS WE DID ON THE SCREEN. IT'S IN YOUR PACKETS. THERE'S 30 OR 40 OF THEM. SO AS WE TALKED ABOUT IN THE PAST, AND WE'VE TALKED ABOUT SPECIFICALLY WITH THE FIVE ROAD TREATMENT, UM IS THAT IF ANOTHER AGENCY BIDS THIS PER BID LAW, WE CAN DO IT IN A LOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THEM AND BENEFIT FROM THEIR BID, AND SO THIS. THIS ITEM UPDATES US WITH ALL THOSE VARIOUS INTER LOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENTS. MR CORBYN, CAN YOU WEIGH IN ON THIS? SO I'M JUST OUT OF CURIOSITY. UM, WE'VE WE'VE GOT A LOT OF THESE AND WE USED TO BUY BOARDS AND I'VE SEEN THIS IN

[01:05:01]

PLAY. BUT WHAT'S WHAT'S THE POINT OF HAVING US ACTUALLY ADOPT IN OUR LOCALS INSTEAD OF JUST SAYING IF SOMEBODY HAS A BIT A BIT AT A CERTAIN PRICE POINT, WE CAN GET IT LIKE WHAT'S WHAT'S THE POINT OF GOING THROUGH THE EXTRA STEP TO MAKING THOSE CITIES AGREE TO OUR TO ALLOW SHARING WITH US? THE STATUTE REQUIRES US TO DO IT THAT WAY. SO WE HAVE TWO GOOD LEGAL ANSWER, BUT I'M KIND OF CURIOUS IF THERE'S A REASON. I MEAN LEGISLATIVELY LEGISLATIVE WOULD PREFER THAT WE DID THIS RIGHT AND WE GO THROUGH THE BID PROCESS. WE ADVERTISE THAT WE GIVE EVERYBODY A SHOT AT IT RIGHT AND WE NORMALLY DO THAT. BUT IF WE LOOK OUT THERE AND THERE'S SOMEBODY'S ALREADY DONE IT IN, ESPECIALLY RECENTLY AND WE LIKE THAT PRICE. AND THEY AND THEY'RE ONLY GONNA HOLD THAT BUILD FOR A CERTAIN AMOUNT OF TIME ANYWAY. WE CAN DO IT IN OUR LOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT THAT REQUIRES YOU THE COUNCIL TO AGREE WITH WHOEVER THE OTHER ENTITY IS THEIR COUNSEL OR THEIR GOVERNING BOARD, SO IT'S A LEGISLATIVE RELATIONSHIP IN AGREEMENT THAT WE CAN BORROW. WE CAN USE THEIR BID PRICES, SO THAT'S IT IN KIND OF LAYMAN'S TERMS, BUT I'LL GO WITH ASHLEY'S ANSWER. YOU HAVE TO. IT'S A PRECISE ANSWER, AND THAT'S WHAT I EXPECT FROM YOU. SO THANK YOU. THAT WASN'T BEING MEAN ABOUT THAT. BUT IT IS. IT IS AN INTERESTING STEP BECAUSE IT WOULD SEEM THAT MAKE IT A LOT MORE EFFICIENT IF WE COULD JUST USE THE PRICING FROM ANOTHER AGENCY IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, BUT I MEAN I GET THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE TO DO. I'M JUST NOT QUITE SURE WHAT THEY ARE. I THINK THE WORD GREAT. ALRIGHT VERY GOOD.

SO COUNCILORS, YOU'VE HEARD WHAT THIS IS? DO YOU AGREE AND CONCUR, AND WE WANT TO GET SOME SPECIAL PRICING. WE'RE OPEN PROMOTIONS. ALRIGHT ALREADY GOT THEIR ALRIGHT. I WAS JUST GETTING MY SCREEN UP. MOTION TO WHAT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. MOTION TO APPROVE BY COUNCILOR MORE SECONDED BY COUNCILOR BOYER. ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION. END UP. NOTICE SIX OUT OF SIX WITH ONE ABSTENTION. ONE ABSOLUTE EXCUSE ME, NOT ABSTENTION. ALRIGHT NEXT ONE PURCHASING AGREEMENT WITH

[5E. Consider a Resoluon of the Town of Northlake, Texas, approving and authorizing the Town Manager to execute a purchase agreement with The Fulcrum Group for the purchase of two network servers, in an amount not to exceed $46,536.98]

THE FULCRUM GROUP TO PURCHASE STUDENT NETWORK SERVERS AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 46 5 AND CHANGE.

ANY REPLACEMENT, A COUPLE SERVERS THAT NEW JUST REPLACEMENTS? YES AND, UM YEAH, THE SO WE HAVE A SERVER THAT IS NEARING INTO LIFE. THEY ACTUALLY THE WARRANTIES EXPIRED. WE'RE TRYING TO DO SOME EXTENSIONS, BUT UM YOU KNOW HOW TECHNOLOGY WORKS. THE NEW SOFTWARE DOESN'T WORK ON THE OLD HARDWARE. UM AND THIS THIS HAS BEEN PLANNED. THIS WAS A PLANNED REPLACEMENT. WE ARE, UM UM. WE'RE RUNNING. YOU KNOW, WE ALWAYS WE ALWAYS NEED SPACE. NOW WE HAVE SOME STORAGE DEVICES, BUT WE STILL NEED THE SERVERS KIND OF TELL EVERYTHING WHERE TO GO IN THE BRAIN POWER TO DO THIS. THESE SERVICE WILL BE LOCATED IN ACTUALLY IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT. BUT THEY'RE ALL NETWORK WILL HAVE WILL HAVE A SMALLER DEVICE IN PUBLIC WORKS THAT JUST HELPS. WITH THOSE PACKETS OF INFORMATION, BUT THIS IS THIS IS PART OF THE PLANET WAS BUDGETED. IT IS IT IS TO GET US IN WARRANTY AND KEEP US OPERATING EFFICIENTLY. WHAT'S THE TIME FRAME ON LIFE CYCLE FOR THESE NEW ONES THAT WERE PURCHASING AH, I WOULD I WOULD SAY ABOUT FIVE YEARS OK LITTLE BIT LONGER THAN COMPUTERS, LAPTOPS OR 23 YEARS, ALTHOUGH EVERYTHING KEEPS GETTING REPLACED FASTER AND FASTER. PLANNED OBSOLESCENCE. I PRESUME THESE ARE SUBSTANTIALLY MORE POWERFUL THAN THE LAST ONES. WE HAD SPACE WISE AND ALL THAT. KEEP KEEP UPGRADING BECAUSE THE DEMANDS ARE GETTING ALWAYS GETTING HIGHER AND HIGHER. THESE TWO PARTICULAR ONES ARE THESE USED ACROSS ALL OF OUR FUNCTIONS . ARE THESE THE ONLY TWO WE HAVE AND WHAT'S WHAT'S THE FULL SCOPE OF OUR SITE? SERVER FARM. SO WE, UM. I BELIEVE WE'RE GOING TO GO TO, UM WE? WE? WE MAINTAIN THREE SORT OF ONE GOES DOWN. WE STILL HAVE TO THAT CAN, UH, COMMUNICATE WITH EACH OTHER AND WORK WITH EACH OTHER. WE DO, UM WHAT'S CALLED. VIRTUAL SERVERS, SO WE DO HAVE SERVERS, BUT THERE ARE ONLY THREE SERVERS. BUT THERE'S TRULY LIKE 20 SERVERS VIRTUALLY INSIDE THIS SERVER FARM, SO IT'S UH AND IT'S THEY HAVE THEY HAVE BACKUP. WE HAVE. WE HAVE AN OFFSITE SOURCE THAT THAT DOES IMAGES OF THE SERVERS SO WE CAN GET BACK ONLINE WITHIN HOURS. SO THAT'S THAT'S OUR ROUGH, ROUGH SETUP. IN LAYMAN'S TERMS. THANK YOU APPRECIATE YOU JUMPING IN THIS I T DIRECTOR FOR

[01:10:04]

A MINUTE. COUNCILOR STEALING FURTHER DISCUSSION OR QUESTIONS ABOUT THIS ONE. ALRIGHT, FOUR IS OPEN FOR YOUR EMOTIONS. ALRIGHT MOTION TO APPROVE BY THE MAYOR PRO TEM, SECONDED BY COUNCILOR BOYER. PLEASE OPEN THE VOTING. THAT IS SIX OUT OF SIX WITH ONE ABSENT. WE HAVE ANOTHER PURCHASE

[5F. Consider a Resoluon of the Town of Northlake, Texas, approving and authorizing the Town Manager to execute a purchase agreement with Andale Construcon, for HA5 Pavement Treatment, in an amount not to exceed $191,675.00]

AGREEMENT FOR THE TOWN OF NORTH LAKE AUTHORIZED DOWN AMERICA MANAGER TO PURCHASE A, UH UM EXECUTED PURCHASE AGREEMENT WITH ANDALE CONSTRUCTION FOR A FIVE PAVEMENT TREATMENT AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED 1 91 6 75. TO SUMMARIZE THIS FROM LAST TIME. SURE REMEMBER THE PRESENTATION FROM LAST TIME. THIS IS A HIGH DENSITY TREATMENT. IT EXTENDS THE LIFE OF THE ROAD. I WAS MAYOR EARLIER THIS WEEK. THERE IS A SWEET SPOT ON WHEN YOU USE THIS FIRST OFF CONCRETE ROADS.

THIS IS NOT APPLICABLE TO SO THIS IS JUST FOR ASPHALT. UM OBVIOUSLY DON'T WANT TO DO IN A BRAND NEW ROAD. IT'S NOT READY YET, AND YOU CAN'T DO IT ON THE ROAD. THAT'S THAT DOESN'T HAVE A DECENT BASE OR IS ALREADY IN PRETTY BAD SHAPE THAT NEEDS TO BE REPLACED. BUT IF WE HAVE A ROAD WITH A GOOD SERVICE, A GOOD SUB BASE, WE CAN APPLY THIS AND EXTEND THE LIFE OF THIS ROAD. IT HAS A COUPLE OF FEATURES TO IT. IT HAS UV PROTECTION BECAUSE THE TEXAS SUN, UM WILL BREAK DOWN THOSE CHEMICAL BONDS AND THE ASPHALT. IT ACTUALLY CREATES A LAYER THAT KEEPS THE OILS IN.

THE ASPHALT AND KEEPS IT, UM SO THAT IT STAYS TOGETHER BETTER BECAUSE THAT THAT DRYING WILL.

UM INCREASE THE DETERIORATION OF THAT ROADWAY. UH ACTUALLY DROVE THROUGH COPPER CANYON. UH THIS IS THE NEAREST ONE WITH HIS TREATMENT DROVE THE ROAD PRETTY MUCH, JUST LIKE ANY OTHER ASPHALT ROAD AS FAR AS THE DRIVE CONDITION. UM THERE'S A LITTLE DARKER. IT'S ABOUT THE SAME COLOR AS A BRAND NEW ASPHALT ROAD, SO IT WILL HAVE A AESTHETICALLY TO LOOK LIKE A NEW PAVED ASPHALT ROAD. UH AND ELLY AND OLLY WILL HAS A FIVE YEAR GUARANTEE. SO THERE'S ANY PROBLEMS WITH THIS. THEY'LL COME BACK AND FIX THESE AREAS. THIS AS WE TALKED ABOUT LAST TIME. IT IS A PRETTY EXTENSIVE PROCESS. IT GOES VERY QUICK, BUT IT IS GOING TO BE AN INCONVENIENCE FOR THOSE HOMEOWNERS, BUT WELL OVER, COMMUNICATE WITH THEM ON THE STAGING OF THAT THERE'S NO EXCAVATION CONSTRUCTION STAGING . IT'S AN APPLICATION OR CREWS ARE ALREADY OUT THERE NOW, ANY ANY KIND OF SMALLER CRACKS? THEY'RE FILLING, SO THEY HAVE A CONTINUOUS CONTINUOUS SURFACE BEFORE THEY APPLY THIS TREATMENT. COUNSELORS ANY QUESTIONS FOR MR CORN FOR ME DISCUSS? OKAY? UM ACTUALLY HAD A QUESTION. JUST IN TERMS OF WHAT IS THE TOTAL FOOTPRINT OF ASPHALT ROAD, SO I'M THINKING OF YOU JUST HAVE SOME NEW SURFACES ON MULTI WE'VE GOT FLORENCE AND FOUGHT BEING REPLACED. WE'VE GOT FLORENCE NORTH, WHICH ISN'T IT NEEDS TO BE REPLACED, CAN USE THIS. AH, BEING, UM SCHOBER. DOESN'T HAVE TO BE REPLACED, TOO. TOO LATE FOR THIS KIND OF TREATMENT. PORTIONS OF CLEVELAND GIVES THOSE ARE BEING REPLACED IN OUR LONGER PLAN. UM DO WE HAVE ANY OTHERS THAT I'M THINKING OF THAT ARE NOT THINKING OF RATHER THAT I'M MISSING. UH, THE VULCAN MIND MELD TRYING TO GET IN THERE. I DON'T I DON'T KNOW WHAT I WANT TO DO THAT. UH UM. YEAH WE HAVE . WE HAVE A SECTION OF CLEVELAND GETS OLD CLEVELAND GIBBS. THAT'S ASPHALT. SINCE WE BUILT DELL EARNHARDT WAY IT DOESN'T GET NEAR THE TRAFFIC. WE COULD LOOK AT THAT. UM JUST KIND OF. MEANDERING THROUGH THE TOWN. MOST OF OUR INDUSTRIAL AREA IS GOING TO BE CONCRETE. UH, MCPHERSON, SIR. I COULDN'T THINK OF ANY OTHER MISSING. JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WE HAD DONE A FULL SCAN. UM AND I KNOW YOU'RE RIGHT IN CLEVELAND GIBBS. WE HAVE SOME TEMPORARY SERVICES, BUT THOSE IN A FEW YEARS. THOSE WILL BE REALIGNED AND REPLACED. THAT'S MY THOUGHT AS WELL. OKAY THAT'S GOOD. UM ALSO SEEN WE CAN ALSO WE CAN ALSO LOOK AT OLD JUSTIN WROTE THE SECTION THAT'S NORTH OF PRAIRIE VIEW FARMS THAT MIGHT BE ELIGIBLE. IT'S BRAND NEW, SO WE WOULDN'T DO THAT YET, BUT WE COULD LOOK AT THAT IN A COUPLE OF YEARS. OKAY VERY GOOD. THANK YOU ALSO HAD A CHANCE TO DRIVE THE COPPER CANYON SECTION. IT'S A STRIKINGLY GOOD LOOKING ROAD,