THOUGHT YOU SAID THAT. I DON'T. GOT TO CATCH THEM ALL. I HAVE 530 ON THE DOT. SO I WILL
[1. CALL TO ORDER]
[00:00:12]
FORMALLY OPEN TONIGHT'S MEETING. WELCOME, EVERYONE, FOR ATTENDING THE NORTH LAKE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING. WE WILL BEGIN WITH OUR ANNOUNCEMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS,[2.A. Briefing - Approved Plats Report ]
AND PRESENTATIONS. ALL RIGHT. GOT A PRETTY QUICK ONE TONIGHT. FIRST WITH THE APPROVED PLATS REPORT. GOT ONE PLAT THAT WAS APPROVED SINCE YOUR LAST MEETING. IT WAS DHL NORTH LAKE.LOTS ONE AND LOT TWO. IT'S COVERS ABOUT 97 ACRES LOCATED OFF OF MCPHERSON ROAD. IT'S IN OUR THE CATHERINE BRANCH INDUSTRIAL AREA ZONED INDUSTRIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
SO HERE'S THE SITE OUTLINED IN RED AND IT IS ACCESSED OFF OF THAT NEW ALIGNMENT IN YELLOW OF MCPHERSON DRIVE. YOU'LL SEE REMNANTS OF HERMANSON ROAD LEFT THERE, AND THAT WILL REMAIN AS AN ACCESS EASEMENT AND KIND OF UTILITY CORRIDOR THERE. THERE'S KIND OF ONE LITTLE OUT PARCEL THAT'S. THAT'S OUTSIDE THE TOWN LIMITS CURRENTLY AND IS ACCESSED THROUGH THAT HERMANSON ROAD ACCESS EASEMENT. HERE'S WHAT THE PLAT LOOKS LIKE. THIS TWO VERY LARGE LOTS AND ON THEM ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED A SOME LARGE WAREHOUSE BUILDINGS, ONE ABOUT ONE POINT 1,000,000FT■!S AND THE OTHER ONE ABOUT 370,000FT■!S. AND GOING THE WROG WAY. ANY QUESTIONS ON THAT? AND I WILL POINT OUT THAT WE APPROVED THIS CONDITIONALLY. THERE IS ONE ADDITION THAT'S GOING TO BE ADDED BEFORE THIS PLAT IS RECORDED. THERE'S A ENCORE ELECTRIC EASEMENT THAT'S BEING DEDICATED BY SEPARATE INSTRUMENT THAT WE ASKED THEM TO PUT ON THE PLAT, SHOW THAT ON THE PLAT. SO THAT ALL THE INFORMATION IS CONTAINED ON THAT ONE PLAT DOCUMENT. ALL
[2.B. Briefing - Town Council actions on Planning & Zoning Commission items ]
RIGHT. AND THEN NEXT I'LL UPDATE YOU ON ACTIONS THAT TOWN COUNCIL HAS TAKEN ON ITEMS THAT WENT BEFORE YOU PREVIOUSLY. AT YOUR LAST MEETING, YOU CONSIDERED A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT AS WELL AS A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ZONING FOR THE DOWN STONE PROPERTY. US, P, AND Z HELD PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR BOTH THOSE ITEMS. THERE WERE NO SPEAKERS THEN, AND YOU RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF BOTH OF THOSE ITEMS UNANIMOUSLY. HERE, YOU SEE, COUNCIL CONSIDERED THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT APPROVED IT WITH THE NARROW VOTE OF 4 TO 3. AND THEN FOLLOWING THAT ITEM, THEY ACTUALLY ACTED ON THE ANNEXATION OF THE PROPERTY. SO THAT PROPERTY IS NOW IN THE TOWN LIMITS. AND THAT WAS ALL KIND OF PART OF A PLAN WITH AN APPROVED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT. AND THEN THE NEXT ITEM COUNCIL CONSIDERED AFTER THAT ANNEXATION WAS THE ZONING FOR THE PROPERTY. YOU REMEMBER ABOUT ROUGHLY A THIRD OF THE PROPERTY WAS IN THE TOWN LIMITS. THE REMAINING TWO THIRDS WAS OUTSIDE AND GOT ANNEXED IN. AND THAT ZONING WAS APPROVED BY A VOTE OF 6 TO 1. SO ANY QUESTIONS? NATHAN, I HAVE A QUESTION. AND THIS WAS. TO SOME EXTENT BROUGHT UP AT THE LAST MEETING WHEN IT WAS DISMISSED.IT WAS RELATED TO, YOU KNOW, HOW POLICE MIGHT ACCESS THE COMMUNITY. AND THE ANSWER WAS, YOU KNOW, THE TRAFFIC WOULDN'T BE AN ISSUE AND SO ON AND SO FORTH, BECAUSE THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT TO THE COMMUNITY IS LIMITED TO. 156. SO 407 TRAFFIC PROBLEMS ARE PROBABLY NOT RELEVANT. BUT I WAS THERE JUST THE OTHER DAY HEADING INTO JUSTIN AND SITTING AT THE TRAIN TRACKS FOR QUITE A LONG TIME, BECAUSE THERE WAS A TRAIN, OBVIOUSLY. AND IT OCCURRED TO ME THAT THE POLICE WOULD HAVE A HUGE DELAY GETTING TO AN EMERGENCY IF THERE WAS NO ACCESS TO THE PROPERTY FROM 407 THERE. THERE IS ACCESS TO 407. IT'S NOT THE SMOOTHEST ROAD, BUT THERE THERE IS ACCESS FROM 407. SO YOU WOULDN'T HAVE TO CROSS THE RAILROAD TRACK. OKAY.
[00:05:06]
IN THE EVENT OF AN EMERGENCY, IT PROBABLY WOULDN'T BE THE TYPICAL WAY THEY WOULD. THEY WOULD COME AT IT, BUT THEY CAN GET THROUGH THERE. I'VE, I'VE DRIVEN THROUGH THERE IN MY VEHICLE. SO GOOD. THANK YOU. AND I THINK IN RESPONSE TO THAT CONCERN ABOUT POLICE SERVICE AT THIS TIME, IT IS A LITTLE BIT OUT OF THE WAY, BUT IT'S SOMETHING THE POLICE WOULD BE ABLE TO TO TO HANDLE. FINE. ULTIMATELY, IT'LL BE MORE CONNECTED INTO THE STREET NETWORK. AND THERE WAS SOME CONCERNS ABOUT THE COST OF PROVIDING POLICE SERVICE FOR THAT AREA. THESE WILL BE PROPERTY OWNERS PAYING PROPERTY TAXES, WHICH COVERS THOSE THOSE COSTS. SO. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR HIM? NO. OKAY. THANK YOU. OKAY. AT THIS TIME, IS THERE ANYONE PRESENT WHO WOULD LIKE TO ADDRESS THE COMMISSION ON A TOPIC THAT'S NOT ON OUR AGENDA? IT'S TIME FOR PUBLIC INPUT. IF THERE'S ANYONE WHO'D LIKE TO SPEAK. OKAY. 536 OPENING PUBLIC INPUT AND NO ONE COMING FORWARD WILL CLOSE IT AT THE SAME TIME. THANK YOU. SO OUR FIRST ACTION[4.A. Consider approval of meeting minutes for February 24, 2026 ]
ITEM ON THE AGENDA TONIGHT IS TO CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE MEETING MINUTES FROM THE FEBRUARY 24TH, 2026 MEETING. EVERYONE ON THE COMMISSION HAS HAD A CHANCE TO REVIEW THOSE MINUTES. I WOULD ENTERTAIN A MOTION TO APPROVE OR APPROVE WITH CHANGES, MOTION TO APPROVE.IS THERE A SECOND? I'LL SECOND. THANK YOU. DON'T.
[4.A. VOTE]
MOTION CARRIES UNANIMOUSLY. OKAY. THE NEXT ITEM ON THE AGENDA IS TO[4.B. Consider a recommendation on a Site Plan for Classic Collision, a proposed 13,000 square-foot auto collision center on a proposed 1.90-acre lot to be platted in Northport Addition, Block 6, generally located on the east side of IH 35W approximately 400 feet north of Ashmore Lane - Case # 26-SP00001]
CONSIDER A RECOMMENDATION ON A SITE PLAN FOR CLASSIC COLLISION, A PROPOSED 13,000 SQUARE FOOT AUTO COLLISION CENTER ON A PROPOSED 1.9 ACRE LOT TO BE PLATTED IN NORTH PORT ADDITION BLOCK SIX, GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF OF I 35 WEST APPROXIMATELY 400FT NORTH OF ASHMORE LANE. CASE NUMBER 20 6-SP1. ALL RIGHT, SO THIS IS A SITE PLAN. PROPOSED COLLISION CENTER. IT'S ON A 1.9 ACRE SITE THAT IS TO BE PLATTED WITH THE NORTHPORT ADDITION BLOCK SIX, THE PROPERTIES TO THE SOUTH OF IT HAVE BEEN PLATTED. AND THIS PARTICULAR SITE HAS NOT. AND IT'LL ACTUALLY ENCROACH ON THE NORTH PART OF THOSE LOTS HAVE BEEN PLATTED, AND THEY'LL NEED TO BE REPLATTED BECAUSE OF THAT. THIS PROPERTY IS UNDER THAT SAME OWNERSHIP. THAT THAT WHOLE BLOCK AREA DOWN TO ASHMORE LANE IS UNDER THE SAME OWNERSHIP ZONE COMMERCIAL. SO THE PARTICULAR SITE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT TODAY IS THERE IN RED. THE APPLICANT SUBMITTED A SITE PLAN APPLICATION ACCORDING TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE UDC. IT INCLUDES THE SITE PLAN, A LANDSCAPE PLAN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS. IT SHOWS 13,000 SQUARE FOOT AUTO COLLISION CENTER BUILDING AND 74 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED TO SERVE THAT. THESE INCLUDE TEN PUBLIC PARKING SPACES IN THE FRONT, PLUS TWO ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, AND THEN 62 SECURE STORAGE PARKING SPACES. IT WILL BE BEHIND GATED ACCESS, AND THAT INCLUDES SOME SPACES WITHIN THE BUILDING CAR BAYS WITHIN THE BUILDING. BUT IN TOTAL, ALL OF THOSE MEET THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR THIS TYPE OF USE. SO HERE'S A LOOK AT THE THE SITE PLAN. AND THE SECOND SHEET SHOWS A VERY SOUTHERN HALF OF THIS. AND THEN ALL THAT PROPERTY DOWN TO ASHMORE. AND YOU'LL NOTICE THERE'S A SIGN LOCATION THAT'S SHOWN THERE THAT'LL BE A THAT'S PROPOSED TO BE A SHARED SIGN THAT WILL ADVERTISE FOR THIS COLLISION CENTER, AS WELL AS THE FUTURE BUSINESS OR BUSINESSES ON THESE LOTS TO THE SOUTH. SO WE'LL REDUCE THE TOTAL NUMBER OF[00:10:04]
SIGNS ON THOSE PROPERTIES. AND HERE'S THE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. AND WE'LL TALK A LITTLE MORE IN DETAIL ABOUT IT BECAUSE THERE'S A FEW VARIANCE REQUESTS RELATED TO THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. AND THESE ARE THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS. AND THESE BUILDING ELEVATIONS DO MEET ALL OF OUR DESIGN REQUIREMENTS, WHICH WERE RECENTLY UPDATED. AND I SAID MOST OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE SITE PLAN PACKAGE MEET OR EXCEED THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS IN THE UDC, BUT THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED APPROVAL OF AN ALTERNATE LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH A FEW VARIANCES. THOSE INCLUDE A REDUCTION OF THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE FRONTAGE FROM 25FT TO 10FT, AND THEN PLANTING THE TREES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED IN THAT BUFFER AT ALTERNATE LOCATIONS ON THE PROPERTY INSTEAD OF WITHIN THAT BUFFER. PART OF THE REASONING FOR THIS IS THE AT LEAST FOR THE REDUCED BUFFER SIZE IS. THERE'S A UNIQUE SHAPE OF THIS PROPERTY AND A REDUCES SOME OF THE ABILITY TO DEVELOP IT EFFICIENTLY. AND THERE'S ALSO A LARGE PARKWAY AREA BETWEEN THE PROPERTY LINE AND THE ADJACENT 35 FRONTAGE ROAD PAVEMENT. SO IN EFFECT, YOU'RE GOING TO HAVE MORE LANDSCAPED AREA THAN YOU TYPICALLY WOULD HAVE ON A TYPICAL THOROUGHFARE. THE REQUEST FOR THE ALTERNATE LOCATION FOR PLANTING THE TREES IS DUE TO UTILITY AND EASEMENT CONFLICTS. ALONG THAT FRONTAGE. THEY'VE ALSO REQUESTED A VARIANCE TO PLANT THE REQUIRED PARKING LOT TREES AND ALTERNATE LOCATIONS. ALSO, DUE TO LIMITATIONS DUE TO THE UTILITY EASEMENT CONFLICTS. AND THEN FINALLY, THEY'VE PROPOSED PROVIDING THE REQUIRED FOUNDATION PLANTINGS, AN ALTERNATE LOCATION INSTEAD OF RIGHT IN FRONT OF THE THE BUILDING FACADE. THEY'RE PROPOSING ENHANCED LANDSCAPING PROVIDED AT THE ENTRY DRIVEWAY ON EACH SIDE OF IT. SO I'LL SHOW YOU WHAT THESE THESE LOOK LIKE. SO FIRST IS THAT LANDSCAPE SETBACK, THIS GREEN STRIP THAT'S THEY'RE PROPOSING A TEN FOOT LANDSCAPE SETBACK, TYPICALLY A 25FT, 25 FOOT ONE WOULD BE REQUIRED. BUT YOU SEE THAT ADDITIONAL AREA OUT TO THE 35 FRONTAGE ROAD. IT'S ABOUT 34FT WIDE. SO IN TOTAL THEY'RE PROVIDING NEARLY 44FT OF LANDSCAPED AREA BETWEEN THE PARKING LOT PAVEMENT AND THE FRONTAGE ROAD PAVEMENT. TYPICALLY WITH OUR THOROUGHFARES, THE PARKWAY WIDTH WOULD BE ABOUT 9 TO 15FT, SO YOU'D BE GETTING ROUGHLY A 34 TO TO 40FT OF, OF PARKWAY.AND THIS IS PROVIDING 44FT. EVEN WITH THE PROPOSED VARIANCE. QUESTION ABOUT THAT. YES. AT SOME POINT WOULD THAT FRONTAGE ROAD AND ANY CHANGE IN I-35 AS IT'S DEVELOPED, WOULD IT ERODE THAT EXTRA BUFFER THAT THAT COULD POTENTIALLY. BECAUSE IT IS TEXAS RIGHT OF WAY, BUT I DON'T BELIEVE THERE'S ANY PLANS TO WIDEN THAT FRONTAGE ROAD. I BELIEVE IT'S AT WHAT IS CURRENTLY PLANNED AS THEIR ULTIMATE. AND I THINK AT THE MOST IT WOULD PROBABLY BE LIKE ONE ADDITIONAL LANE, ANYTHING. AND AND HERE I'VE CIRCLED THE AREA WHERE THEY'VE PROPOSED PLANTING THE REQUIRED TREES THAT WOULD NORMALLY GO IN THAT BUFFER. YOU CAN SEE WITHIN THAT LANDSCAPE BUFFER THOSE LINES, THOSE ARE UTILITY LINES SHOWN IN THERE THAT'S COMPLETELY COVERED BY UTILITY EASEMENTS. SO THEY PROPOSE PLANTING THE TREES IN THIS AREA ON THE THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. AND THE FRONT PARKING LOT AREA. THERE'S A REQUIREMENT TO HAVE ONE TREE THERE PER TEN PARKING SPACES. SO THEY'D BE REQUIRED TO HAVE AT LEAST TWO TREES.
THEY PLAN THOSE IN THESE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE NORTH SIDE AS WELL. AND THEN FINALLY, HERE'S WHERE YOU'D NORMALLY HAVE THE FOUNDATION PLANTINGS IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING. AND THEY ARE PROPOSING INSTEAD TO HAVE ENHANCED LANDSCAPING, ACTUALLY MORE LANDSCAPING, MORE SQUARE FOOTAGE THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED JUST FOR FOUNDATION PLANTINGS ON EACH SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY AT THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING INSTEAD. SO. THE APPLICANT HAS REQUESTED THIS
[00:15:09]
ALTERNATIVE LANDSCAPE PLAN WITH THESE VARIANCES AS AS DESCRIBED. ONE THING TO POINT OUT IS THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING MEETS AND EXCEEDS ALL THE REQUIREMENTS, EXCEPT FOR THE LOCATIONS THAT ARE PROVIDED IN THE UDC. DOES GRANT TOWN COUNCIL AUTHORITY TO APPROVE ALTERNATE COMPLIANCE OR VARIANCE IN OTHER WORD FOR THAT. AND FIRST, IT NEEDS TO GO BEFORE YOU AS THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION, AS PART OF THE SITE PLAN FOR YOU TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON. AND THEN THEN IT WILL GO ON TO TOWN COUNCIL. THAT'S SCHEDULED TO HAPPEN AT THEIR APRIL 9TH MEETING. I WILL POINT OUT THAT WE DO HAVE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE DEVELOPER HERE. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM THEM AS WELL. QUESTION FOR YOU, NATHAN. WHAT ARE THE BUILDINGS AND PROXIMITY TO THIS AREA? WHAT'S BEING BUILT AROUND HERE? LET'S. GO BACK TO THE AERIAL HERE. YEAH.SO JUST TO THE NORTH OF THIS SITE IS A MAIN FREIGHT BUILDING. SO THIS IS THIS IS JUST ACROSS FROM THE TEXAS MOTOR SPEEDWAY. SO THE NORTH OF THIS IS THE WAREHOUSE THAT MAIN FREIGHT IS SOUTH IS THE ENTRANCE TO THE TREEHOUSE. FOODS THAT ARE COFFEE CENTER AND USED TO BE A FARMER BROTHERS HEADQUARTERS. AND THEN EAST OF THIS SITE IS OLDCASTLE INFRASTRUCTURE. SO AND THEN WE'RE HOPING THAT SOUTH OF THIS SITE THAT WE'RE TRYING TO ATTRACT A RESTAURANT TO THAT LOCATION. I MEAN, DO WE FORESEE PROPER BUSINESSES BUILDING AROUND THIS? LIKE YOU'RE MENTIONING A RESTAURANT IN AN INDUSTRIAL AREA THAT DOESN'T SEEM TO JIVE, TRYING TO ATTRACT WAREHOUSES, A COLLISION CENTER AND A RESTAURANT? THE THE COLLISION CENTER USE AND RESTAURANTS ARE BOTH PERMITTED USES AND COMMERCIAL ZONING SO THAT IT'S A PERMITTED USE. THE WE FEEL LIKE THE RESTAURANT FITS WELL ON THE FRONTAGE ROAD, AND BEING RIGHT ACROSS FROM A FACILITY LIKE TREE HOUSE, RIGHT ACROSS FROM THE TEXAS MOTOR SPEEDWAY. SO. VERY SHORTLY.
INVESTOR FRIENDLY. YES. I DON'T KNOW WHY IT'S HERE. I HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT. OKAY, SO I'M LOOKING AT THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND I'M LOOKING AT THE WEST ELEVATION DRAWING. SO. IF I'M INTERPRETING THIS CORRECTLY. COMING IN THE THE DRIVEWAY THERE, IT'S JUST GOING TO BE THE END OF THE BUILDING. THERE'S, THERE'S NO, NO PLANNING, NOTHING TO SOFTEN THAT FACADE. IS THAT CORRECT? THAT'S CORRECT. THEY, THEY HAVE THE, THE LANDSCAPING ON EACH SIDE OF THE DRIVEWAY THERE. RIGHT, RIGHT. OKAY. AND IS, IS THERE GOING TO BE A DOOR AT THAT END? OH, THERE WILL BE, THERE WILL BE A DOOR THERE. OKAY. SO IT'S NOT JUST GOING TO BE A BLANK. IT'S. YEAH, THAT'S ACTUALLY WHERE THE GLASS FRONT IS. OKAY. SO OKAY. IS THAT RIGHT? I'M LOOKING AT THAT DIRECTLY. SO YEAH, YEAH. AWESOME. THANK YOU COMMISSIONERS. MY NAME IS OWEN BARTLETT WITH SIX S DEVELOPMENT ADDRESS 18333 PRESTON ROAD, DALLAS, TEXAS 75252. I CAN GIVE YOU GUYS KIND OF A LITTLE BACKGROUND ON CLASSIC REALLY QUICK. THEY ARE BASED OUT OF AUGUSTA, GEORGIA. THEY HAVE 300 STORES ACROSS THE US BUT ONLY A COUPLE HERE. SO THIS WILL BE THE THIRD ONE THAT'S ACTUALLY COMING TO THE DFW AREA.
PREVIOUSLY WE HAD A 17,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING ON THIS SITE, BUT WITH WHILE TRYING TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE DEPTH OF THAT BUILDING, KIND OF THE IRREGULAR SHAPE OF THIS PARCEL, WE WERE ABLE TO TALK WITH OUR TENANT AND DECREASE THE BUILDING SO THAT WE COULD ADD MORE LANDSCAPE AND MAKE THIS FIT A LITTLE BIT BETTER, WHILE ALLOWING ACCESS AROUND THE ENTIRE SITE. AND WITH THE IRREGULAR SHAPE AND IT BEING ZONED COMMERCIAL, IT'S, YOU KNOW, WE HAVE A 13,000 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING HERE. IT MAKES IT PRETTY TOUGH TO, I GUESS, PUT A COMMERCIAL SERVICE HERE THAT IS GOING TO BE MUCH SMALLER. SO WE'RE TRYING TO DO THE BEST WE CAN WITH THE PROPERTY. BUT YEAH, I'M HERE TO ANSWER ANY QUESTIONS THAT YOU GUYS HAVE. THANK YOU. OKAY. I HAVE A QUESTION AS A I'M SORRY. GO
[00:20:03]
AHEAD. AS A NORFOLK RESIDENT, IF I'M DRIVING DOWN THIS ROAD OR DRIVING BY, AM I SEEING A WHOLE STACK OF COLLISION CARS AND JUST THE VISUAL, YOU KNOW, NOT GREAT WITH A COLLISION CENTER. SO CAN YOU TALK ABOUT THAT? YEAH, DEFINITELY. SO ALL REPAIRS WILL BE DONE INSIDE ANY OF THE VEHICLES THAT LET'S SAY ARE BROKEN DOWN ARE ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE OR ON THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING IN THE PARKING LOT, THEY'LL BE BEHIND A FENCE. AND PER TOWN OF NORTHLAKE CODE, IT CAN'T BE A CHAIN LINK FENCE. SO IT WON'T BE OPAQUE. IT'LL IT'LL OR IT WON'T BE SEE THROUGH. IT'LL BE A VINYL KIND OF MASONRY LOOKING WALL THAT YOU'LL SEE. SO YOU WON'T SEE ANY OF THE BROKEN DOWN CARS OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT. AND THEN ALL WORK WILL BE DONE INSIDE THE BUILDING. OKAY, I GUESS I WOULD HAVE MAYBE A FOLLOW UP TO YOUR INITIAL QUESTION BECAUSE AS YOU WERE GOING THROUGH, NATHAN, AS YOU WERE GOING THROUGH YOUR PIECE, IN MY MIND, I'M THINKING, IS OUR ROLE STRATEGIC OR TACTICAL HERE? IF IT'S TACTICAL, YOU'VE DONE A BEAUTIFUL JOB OF LAYING OUT WHAT YOU NEED TO LAY OUT. AND I REALLY DON'T HAVE ANY ISSUES. AND THE FACT THAT IT'S NOT, FROM WHAT I'M HEARING, GOING TO BE AN EYESORE. THAT'S IMPORTANT. IF IT'S IF OUR IF WE'RE BEING TASKED TO BE STRATEGIC ABOUT THIS, I DON'T FEEL THAT WE'RE ARMED WITH ENOUGH INFORMATION TO, SAY, PUTTING A COLLISION CENTER NEXT TO A PLACE THAT'S SUPPOSED TO HAVE A RESTAURANT, RIGHT? OR WHATEVER ELSE MIGHT BE THERE, I DON'T KNOW. SO MY FIRST QUESTION WOULD BE, ARE WE BEING TASKED TO BE STRATEGIC AND TACTICAL OR TACTICAL? YOUR TASK IS JUST TO REVIEW AND MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON THE SITE PLAN, NOT THE USE. THE USE IS IS PERMITTED. SO THAT STRATEGY HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE. I ASSUME SO, BUT HIS QUESTION MAY BE THINKING. GOOD QUESTION. THE QUESTION. I WILL POINT OUT ANOTHER. ANOTHER OBSTACLE ON THIS PROPERTY. YOU'LL SEE THERE'S SOME SIGNIFICANT DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE. BUT IF YOU GO BY THAT PROPERTY TODAY, THERE'S A BIG CHANNEL ALONG THE BACK SIDE OF THIS PROPERTY THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE PUTTING SOME OF THIS UNDERGROUND AND THEY'RE BUILDING THESE BIG. THESE BIG POND AREAS TO. SO THAT KIND OF REDUCES THE AMOUNT OF DEVELOPABLE AREA. AND TO MEET ALL THE REQUIREMENTS, DRAINAGE REQUIREMENTS, LANDSCAPING, EVERYTHING, THEY HAD TO REDUCE THE SIZE OF THE BUILDING. AND THEY'RE STILL HAVE THESE VARIANCE REQUESTS. BUT DOES THAT INCLUDE NOISE? I DON'T KNOW WHAT AN AUTO COLLISION PLACE SOUNDS LIKE. BUT AGAIN, BACK TO THE POINT THAT THERE MIGHT BE MULTI USE.I ASSUME THERE'S BEEN PROVISION FOR THAT CONSIDERED. YES, THEY WOULD HAVE TO MEET ALL OF THE NOISE REQUIREMENTS FOR FOR THAT ZONING DISTRICT. AND THIS IS ADJACENT TO INDUSTRIAL AREAS NEXT TO THE FREEWAY. AND ALL THE WORK WILL BE DONE INSIDE THE BUILDING TOO. SO WE. YES.
YEAH. WE DON'T BELIEVE NOISE IS GOING TO BE AS MUCH OF A CONCERN THERE. OKAY. I'D BE MORE CONCERNED ABOUT FUME EMISSIONS THAN NOISE. I ASSUME THERE'S A PAINT SPRAY BOOTH. AS FAR AS THE PAINT EMISSIONS THAT'LL GO THROUGH PERMITTING AS WELL. AND NOW THERE WON'T BE ANY HAZARDOUS EMISSIONS FROM THAT. I WILL NOTE THAT WE ARE WORKING CLOSELY WITH THE THE TWO PARCELS TO THE SOUTH. IT'S ALL ONE SELLER. AND SO WE'RE WORKING WITH THEM, AS MENTIONED ON THE BILLBOARD AND BEING GOOD NEIGHBORS AND MAKING SURE WE'RE NOT CREATING AN EYESORE OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT FOR THEM. SO THANK YOU GUYS. APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? DISCUSSION. DO I HEAR A MOTION? MOTION TO APPROVE? AS SUBMITTED. AS
[4.B. VOTE]
SUBMITTED. THANK YOU. I SECOND OKAY LET'S VOTE. MOTION CARRIES 5 TO 1. OKAY. THERE BEING NO OTHER ITEMS ON OUR AGENDA, IT'S 554.* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.