QUARTER. MR. UNCOMFORTABLE. ALL RIGHT. IT'S 530. LET'S GO AHEAD AND CALL TO ORDER THE NORTH
[1. CALL TO ORDER ]
[00:00:09]
LAKE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING FOR AUGUST 25TH, 2026. FIRST ITEM IS GOING[2.A. Briefing - Approved Plats Report ]
TO BE ANNOUNCEMENTS, PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS. I BELIEVE NATHAN'S GOT SOME BRIEFINGS. YES. SO I'LL JUST START OUT WITH THE APPROVED PLANS REPORT. THESE ARE THERE ARE A COUPLE OF PLOTS APPROVED SINCE. SINCE YOUR LAST MEETING. AND I'M LIKE GOING THE WRONG DIRECTION. THIS FIRST ONE IS PLAT OF JUST OVER 11 ACRE PROPERTY. IT'S CALLED 40 ACRES.IT'S AT 7896 EVELYN LANE. AND THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED RURAL RESIDENTIAL. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PLAT WAS TO DIVIDE IT INTO TWO FIVE PLUS ACRE RESIDENTIAL LOTS. ONE WILL FRONT ON EVELYN THERE ON THE SOUTH, AND THE OTHER ONE WILL HAVE ACCESS TO ROPES AND RANCH ON THE NORTH.
AND THIS FULLY MEETS THE RURAL RESIDENTIAL ZONING. AND THE NEXT ONE IS NORTH PORT ADDITION LOTS ONE R AND TWO OF BLOCK SIX. THIS IS 4.7 ACRE PROPERTY PORTION OF IT WAS PREVIOUSLY PLATTED AND IS BEING REPLANTED WITH. WITH THIS PLAT, THE LOT TWO ON THE NORTH SIDE IS WHERE CLASSIC COLLISION IS CURRENTLY JUST STARTED. CONSTRUCTION ON THAT SITE. THE LOT ONE AND WHAT WAS LOT THREE ARE BEING COMBINED INTO ONE LOT. LOT ONE R AND THE OWNER IS PURSUING A RESTAURANT FOR FOR THAT SITE. THIS SITE IS ZONED COMMERCIAL AND MEETS ALL THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THAT ZONING. ANY QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. READY TO MOVE TO THE NEXT BRIEFING ITEM. SO I JUST
[2.B. Briefing - Town Council actions on Planning & Zoning Commission items ]
WANT TO UPDATE YOU ON COUNCIL ACTIONS ON ITEMS THAT WENT BEFORE YOU. PREVIOUSLY, THERE WERE TWO SITE PLANS THAT YOU CONSIDERED AT YOUR LAST MEETINGS IN JUNE. THEY BOTH HAVE VARIANCES, WHICH THEY HAD TO GO ON TO TOWN COUNCIL FOR FINAL APPROVAL. THE FIRST ONE WAS EVER HOME SUITES, IF YOU RECALL, THEY REQUESTED A A VARIANCE TO THE LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR A ENCROACHMENT INTO THEIR LANDSCAPE SETBACK ON KIND OF THE REAR OF THE PROPERTY. P AND Z UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THAT SITE PLAN AS IT WAS PRESENTED WITH THAT VARIANCE, THEY WERE ABLE TO PROVIDE ALL THE TREES AND OTHER LANDSCAPING ELEMENTS REQUIRED, AND THAT WENT BEFORE TOWN COUNCIL AT THEIR JULY 23RD MEETING, WHERE THEY ALSO UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED THE SITE PLAN AS PRESENTED WITH THAT SAME LANDSCAPE VARIANCE. ALSO, AT THAT JUNE 26TH MEETING, YOU CONSIDERED THIS SITE PLAN AMENDMENT FOR STUDIO REZ. THIS WAS A SITE PLAN THAT HAD BEEN PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. AND WITH THAT CAME A LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT SHOWED LANDSCAPING ALONG THE 114 FRONTAGE THAT COULDN'T BE PLANTED DUE TO UTILITY CONFLICTS. AND PNC UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF THAT SITE PLAN AS PRESENTED WITH THE CONDITION THAT FUNDS IN LIEU OF TREE PLANTING BE REQUIRED FOR THE 12 TREES THAT CANNOT BE PLANTED THAT WENT BEFORE TOWN COUNCIL AT THEIR JULY 23RD MEETING, WHERE THEY ALSO APPROVED THE SITE PLAN AS PRESENTED WITH THE CONDITION AS RECOMMENDED BY PNC, AND THAT APPROVAL WAS BY A VOTE OF 5 TO 2. ANY QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. AT THIS TIME WE'LL OPEN IT UP FOR PUBLIC INPUT. I'VE GOT ONE INPUT FORM FROM MR. MCGREGOR. TIME IS 534. I CAN JUST DO THE PUBLIC HEARING ON. MIGHT BE THAT I'M GOING TO DO THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE. OKAY. IT'S A ZONING CASE. ALL RIGHT. SINCE THERE'S NO PUBLIC INPUT, WE'LL GO AHEAD AND CLOSE PUBLIC INPUT AT 535. AND WE'LL MOVE ON TO ACTION ITEMS. FIRST ONE IS CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THE[4.A.Consider approval of meeting minutes for June 23, 2026 ]
[00:05:05]
MEETING MINUTES FOR THE JUNE 23RD, 2026 MEETING. DO I HAVE A MOTION TO APPROVE MOTION? DO I[4.A. VOTE]
HAVE A SECOND?[4.B.Consider a recommendation on a zoning change request from RR – Rural Residential to I – Industrial for approximately 5.0 acres of land located on the northeast corner of E Sam Lee Lane and Dale Earnhardt Lane at 8921 East Sam Lee Lane. Case # 26-ZCA00002 i. Public Hearing ii. Consider Recommendation ]
NEXT ACTION ITEM? CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION. CONSIDER A RECOMMENDATION ON A ZONING CHANGE REQUEST FROM RURAL RESIDENTIAL TO INDUSTRIAL FOR APPROXIMATELY FIVE ACRES OF LAND LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF EAST SAM LEE LANE AND DALE EARNHARDT LANE. AT 8921 EAST SAM LEE LANE, CASE 26ZCA2, AND WE'LL OPEN IT UP FOR PUBLIC HEARING. I'LL DO A SHORT PRESENTATION FIRST, AND THEN WE CAN OPEN THAT UP, IF YOU DON'T MIND. JUST WANT TO GIVE YOU SOME PERSPECTIVE ON THE LOCATION OF THIS ZONING CHANGE UNDER CONSIDERATION. SEE, THIS IS IN THE FAR SOUTHERN PART OF NORTH LAKE AND AN AREA SURROUNDED BY INDUSTRIAL USES.ON THE RIGHT SIDE OF THIS SLIDE, YOU'LL SEE A CLOSE UP AERIAL VIEW SHOWING THERE'S WAREHOUSES ON TWO SIDES. AND THEN ON THE OTHER TWO SIDES IS WRAPPED BY A RV PARK. THIS. LET ME SEE. THIS PROPERTY IS ZONED CURRENTLY RURAL RESIDENTIAL. YOU'LL SEE THE RIGHT SIDE IS THE CURRENT ZONING MAP. IT'S THE LAST REMAINING RURAL RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IN THIS AREA. ALL THIS PURPLE IS INDUSTRIAL ZONING. AND THIS PINK COLOR IS A COMMERCIAL ZONING. THERE'S JUST A LITTLE STRIP BETWEEN THE DALE EARNHARDT RIGHT OF WAY AND AND THIS PROPERTY UNDER CONSIDERATION. AND IT'S THIS PORTION OF IT IS FULLY ENCUMBERED BY GAS PIPELINE EASEMENTS. AND THEN THIS IS MANUFACTURED HOME ZONING THAT ALLOWS FOR RVS TO. AND THIS THIS PROPERTY IS PRETTY MUCH ALL RVS AT THE MOMENT. AND THEN YOU'LL NOTICE ON THE LEFT SIDE, THIS IS OUR FUTURE LAND USE PLAN, WHICH CALLS FOR ALL. THIS GRAY AREA IS OUR INDUSTRIAL INNOVATION ZONE. SO THIS FALLS RIGHT IN THE MIDDLE OF WHERE WE PLAN ULTIMATELY FOR FOR INDUSTRIAL USES. THE THE SITE CONTAINS A ONE RESIDENCE WHICH THE APPLICANT PLANS TO DEMOLISH AND REMOVE THE DEVELOPER ALLIANCE INDUSTRIAL. THEY PLAN TO ULTIMATELY CONSTRUCT A WAREHOUSE FACILITY ON THIS SITE AND. THE WAREHOUSE IS A PERMITTED USE IN THE INDUSTRIAL ZONING DISTRICT. ON THE. THE RIGHT SIDE, YOU'LL SEE. THIS IS JUST KIND OF A CONCEPT OF WHAT A WAREHOUSE ON THAT SITE COULD LOOK LIKE. A SITE PLAN AND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY, EVEN ONCE ONCE ZONE. SO YOU'LL LIKELY BE SEEING THIS AGAIN IF THE ZONING IS APPROVED. AGAIN WITH MORE DETAIL. SO PART OF THE JUSTIFICATION THAT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT FOR THIS REQUEST WAS THAT SURROUNDING ZONING IS A MIXTURE OF INDUSTRIAL, INDUSTRIAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND MANUFACTURED HOME ZONING. THE SURROUNDING USES PRIMARILY INCLUDE WAREHOUSE AND DISTRIBUTION FACILITIES, SIMILAR TO WHAT THEY PROPOSED TO BUILD AND THEN RV PARK ON THE OTHER BOUNDARIES, AND THE PROPERTY SITS IN THE INDUSTRIAL PARK AREA AT THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF 35 W AND 114. THE REQUEST CONFORMS WITH THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE NORTH LAKE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, AS SHOWN ON THE PREVIOUS MAP, AND THE ZONING CHANGE REQUEST IS ACCEPTABLE FOR CONSIDERATION. SO BEFORE YOU CAN ACT ON IT, YOU'LL NEED TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING. NOTICE WAS PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. WE HAVE RECEIVED NO WRITTEN COMMENTS AND AFTER THE HOLDING THE PUBLIC HEARING, YOU MAY MAKE A RECOMMENDATION ON IT OF APPROVAL OR DISAPPROVAL, AND THEN THAT'LL GO ON TO TOWN COUNCIL. AT THEIR SEPTEMBER 24TH MEETING, WE'LL AGAIN HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING AND THEY'LL
[00:10:03]
TAKE FINAL ACTION ON IT. WITH THAT BEING SAID, WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. JOEL MCGREGOR 8921 EAST SAM LEE LANE. THIS IS MY HOUSE. AND OF COURSE, I'M IN FAVOR OF THE ZONING CHANGE BECAUSE THE SALE IS OBVIOUSLY CONTINGENT ON IT. AND I THINK PROBABLY EVERYBODY IN THE TOWN THAT KNOWS ME IS EXCITED ABOUT THIS AND READY TO GET RID OF ME. AND I HEAR, I HEAR THERE'S A PARTY AFTERWARDS IF YOU GUYS APPROVE THIS. EXCEPT DREW DIDN'T GET INVITED, SO. BUT AS YOU CAN SEE, YOU KNOW, THERE'S WAREHOUSES ALL AROUND ME ALREADY, AND IT'S IN THE FUTURE PLAN TO BE INDUSTRIAL. SO THIS IS PRETTY MUCH A RUBBER STAMP, I WOULD ASSUME. AND I GUESS BECAUSE ALLIANCE ISN'T EVEN HERE TO TALK ABOUT IT. SO ASSUME OR ARE THEY. OH, THERE YOU GO. OKAY, GREAT. THEY'RE HERE. SO ANYWAY, I'D APPRECIATE, I GUESS. THANK YOU, THANK YOU.WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. THE TIME IS ZERO OR SORRY. 541. DISCUSSION. MOTIONS FOR
[4.B. VOTE]
APPROVAL. SECOND.ALL RIGHT. PASSES UNANIMOUSLY. UNANIMOUSLY.
[4.C. Consider approval of a Site Plan for Northlake 35 Logistics Park III - Building 7, a proposed 1,223,144 square-foot warehouse building on a 62.84-acre tract of land to be platted as Northlake 35 Logistics Park III - Lot 1 , Block 1, generally located north of McPherson Road and west of the proposed Kelli Ann Drive at 3900 McPherson Drive - Case # 26-SP00006 ]
ALRIGHT. WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM C. CONSIDER APPROVAL OF SITE PLAN FOR NORTH LAKE 35.LOGISTICS PARK THREE, BUILDING SEVEN A PROPOSED 1,223,144 SQUARE FOOT WAREHOUSE ON 62.84 ACRE TRACT OF LAND TO BE PLOTTED AS NORTH LAKE 35 LOGISTICS PARK THREE, LOT ONE, BLOCK ONE. GENERALLY LOCATED NORTH OF MCPHERSON ROAD AND WEST OF THE PROPOSED KELLY ANN DRIVE AT 3900 MCPHERSON DRIVE. CASE NUMBER 26SP6. ALL RIGHT. THIS PROPERTY WAS PREVIOUSLY IN THE TOWN'S EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION. COUNCIL APPROVED A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR THIS PROPERTY, WHICH INCLUDED THAT IT BE ANNEXED IN. IT HAS SINCE BEEN ANNEXED AND ZONED INDUSTRIAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT, AND THIS WILL BE THE LARGEST BUILDING IN THIS SITE THAT WAS ANNEXED. IT'S IS JUST ABOUT 63 ACRES. IT'S LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF MCPHERSON DRIVE AND JUST NORTH. IF YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH THIS, THIS IS A MONDELEZ BUILDING. AND. THIS WILL BE LOCATED JUST NORTH OF THAT. THERE'S A PROPOSED NEW ROAD THAT WILL BE BUILT ON THE EAST SIDE OF OF THIS SITE. AS YOU'LL BE ABLE TO SEE IN THE SITE PLAN. SO HERE, HERE'S A LOOK AT IT. NORTH IS ON YOUR RIGHT SIDE. SO MCPHERSON IS HERE ON THE SOUTH ON THE LEFT.
THE MONDELEZ BUILDING IS OVER HERE. THIS IS A NEW STREET THAT IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION.
AND THIS WILL BE A FUTURE ALIGNMENT OF HARMANSON PART OF IT. IT WILL BE CONTINUED AND TIE IN WITH HARMANSON EXISTING HARMANSON TO THE SOUTH. BUT THIS IS A VERY LARGE BUILDING, JUST OVER ONE POINT 2,000,000FT■!S. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS 866 STANDARD PARKING SPACES. THE MINIMUM REQUIRED IS 245 SO FAR EXCEED THAT. THEY ALSO PROVIDE 281 TRAILER PARKING SPACES. THE SITE PLAN PACKAGE ALSO INCLUDES A LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THESE HUGE BUILDINGS IS VERY DIFFICULT TO GET. ON THESE SLIDES YOU SAW THERE'S SEVERAL PAGES OF THIS. SO KIND OF FOCUSED ON THIS IS THE THE FRONTAGE ALONG MCPHERSON DRIVE,
[00:15:04]
WHICH WILL. ONE OF THE MOST VISIBLE PARTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT. AND THIS IS KIND OF THE OVERALL PLANTING LIST. YOU CAN SEE THE, THE NUMBER OF, OF TREES AND SHRUBS THAT WILL BE PLANTED WITH THIS. AND THEN THEY'RE ALSO BUILDING ELEVATIONS THAT WERE SUBMITTED.SO THESE ARE THE THE EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS. YOU'LL SEE LOTS OF OF DOCK DOORS. THERE'LL BE OFFICE SPACES ON THE FOUR CORNERS OF THE BUILDING. AND THEN THESE ARE THE NORTH AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS THAT YOU'LL THE SOUTH ELEVATION WILL FRONT MCPHERSON. NORTH ELEVATION WILL FRONT THAT FUTURE HARMISON ALIGNMENT. THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED THIS SITE PLAN APPLICATION ACCORDING TO UDC REQUIREMENTS AND THE PACKAGE MEETS OR EXCEEDS ALL APPLICABLE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OF THE UDC AND THE INDUSTRIAL PLAN DEVELOPMENT. SO PNC YOU MAY CONSIDER APPROVAL OF THIS OR APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS OR DISAPPROVAL AS SUBMITTED. ANY DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS? SO, NATHAN, I HEARD YOU SAY A SECOND. IS THIS THE LARGEST BUILDING WAREHOUSE BUILDING WE BUILT OR GOING TO BUILD IF PASSED IN THE TOWN OF NORTHLAKE? I THINK THIS WILL BE THE LARGEST IT'LL BE. IT'S REALLY CLOSE TO A COUPLE OTHERS, BUT I THINK THIS IS SLIGHTLY LARGER. NATHAN, REMIND ME WHY WE HAVE THIS IN FRONT OF US. IF THERE'S NO EXCEPTIONS IN IN, IT'S OKAY. AS SUBMITTED ALL ALL SITE PLANS ARE TO BE APPROVED BY PNC.
THANK YOU VERY MUCH. UNLESS IT'S VERY MINOR MODIFICATIONS. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL. I'LL SAY ALL COMMERCIAL SITE PLANS. SO. ANYONE ELSE HAVE ANYTHING? ALL RIGHT. DO I HAVE ANY MOTIONS?
[4.C. VOTE]
I'LL SECOND.[4.D. Consider a recommendation on a Site Plan for Starbucks, a proposed 2,094 square-foot coffee shop on a 0.68-acre lot, Lot 2, Block A, Pecan Plaza, generally located on the south side of FM 407 at 1261 FM 407 - Case # 26-SP00008 ]
ALL RIGHT. MOTION CARRIES. WE'LL MOVE ON TO ITEM D. SHOULD BE CONSIDER RECOMMENDATION ON A SITE PLAN FOR STARBUCKS. A PROPOSED 2094 SQUARE FOOT COFFEE SHOP ON A 0.68 ACRE LOT. LOT TWO BLOCK A PECAN PLAZA GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF FM 407 AT 1261 FM 407. CASE NUMBER 26SP8. ALL RIGHT, THIS SITE IS JUST RIGHT DOWN THE ROAD ON 407, ON THE OTHER SIDE OF WHAT IS NOW GIBBS ROAD. SO IGNORE THE THE CLEVELAND THERE. BUT THIS WILL BE BUILT ON THE AS PROPOSED TO BE BUILT ON THE WEST SIDE OF WHERE CVS IS CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION ON THE HARD CORNER, THE SITE IS ZONED MIXED USE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND ALLOWS FOR. FOR THIS TYPE OF USE AND THE SITE IS ABOUT 0.68 ACRES. SITE PLAN PACKAGE INCLUDES THE SITE PLAN, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AND BUILDING ELEVATIONS. THE APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED THE SITE PLAN APPLICATION. ACCORDING TO THE UDC REQUIREMENTS, MOST OF THE ELEMENTS OF THE SITE PLAN, PACKAGE, MEET OR EXCEED DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS OUTLINED IN THE MIXED USE PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND THE UDC. HOWEVER, YOU'LL NOTICE THAT YOU'RE MAKING A RECOMMENDATION ON THIS ONE INSTEAD OF APPROVING IT, AND THAT'S BECAUSE THERE'S A VARIANCE REQUEST ASSOCIATED WITH IT. SO IT'LL HAVE TO GO ON TO TOWN COUNCIL FOR FINAL APPROVAL. AND THIS IS A LOOK AT THE SITE PLAN. ON THE LEFT AND ON THE RIGHT YOU SEE THE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. IT'S A BUILDING WITH JUST OVER 200 ZERO SQUARE FEET FOR A STARBUCKS COFFEE SHOP. PROPOSED 23 PARKING SPACES, WHICH EXCEEDS THE THE MINIMUM REQUIRED. AND THEY ALSO HAVE, OF COURSE HAVE A DRIVE THROUGH AND WHICH REQUIRES THE. WHICH INCLUDES THE REQUIRED STACKING OF MINIMUM STACKING OF SEVEN CARS BEFORE THE WINDOW. AND.HERE IS A LOOK AT BUILDING ELEVATIONS. THIS IS THE EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS. AND THEN ON THE TOP OF THE SCREEN IS THE NORTH ELEVATION AND THE SOUTH ELEVATION. SO NOW I'LL DISCUSS
[00:20:08]
THE ELEMENTS THAT DON'T MEET REQUIREMENTS AND REQUIRE A VARIANCE. THE THE. THERE'S A REQUIRED LANDSCAPE STRIP ALONG FM 407. FOR THOSE OF YOU THAT WERE ON PNC WHEN. WHEN CVS CAME BEFORE US, WE DEALT WITH THE SIMILAR ISSUE BECAUSE OF. I'LL SHOW YOU HERE BECAUSE OF CHANGING PLANS FOR 407 AND THE NEED TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL TURN LANES AT THE INTERSECTION WITH GIBBS AND MOVING IT ALL SOUTH BECAUSE OF A LARGE UPPER TRINITY REGIONAL WATER DISTRICT PIPELINE IN THE NORTH THAT AID IN TO THIS PROPERTY A LOT MORE THAN INITIALLY ANTICIPATED. THE DEVELOPER ORIGINALLY INCLUDED. THIS IS A OPEN SPACE SLOT WHERE THEY HAD PLANNED TO HAVE THE REQUIRED TREES AND LANDSCAPE STRIP IN FRONT OF THESE RETAIL PROPERTIES. BUT BECAUSE OF TEXDOT ENCROACHMENT, THAT HAD TO DISPLACE SOME UTILITIES, INCLUDING ATMOS GAS LINE, WHICH IS BEING PUSHED INTO THIS OPEN SPACE EASEMENT. SO YOU CANNOT PLANT TREES IN IT. AND THAT'S WHY CVS CANNOT PLANT TREES. THEY HAD A VARIANCE APPROVED WHERE THEY HAD TO PAY FEES IN LIEU OF THOSE TREE PLANTING. AND THAT IS WHAT THE STARBUCKS PROJECT IS REQUESTING AS WELL.THE UDC GRANTS TOWN COUNCIL FINAL AUTHORITY TO APPROVE ALTERNATE LANDSCAPE COMPLIANCE, WHICH CAN INCLUDE PAYMENT OF THE FEE IN LIEU OF TREE PLANTING FOR ISSUES SUCH AS THIS, WHEN IT'S IMPOSSIBLE OR IMPRACTICAL DUE TO EASEMENTS AND PROXIMITY UTILITIES, ALL OTHER LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS ARE BEING MET. AND AS A REMINDER, THESE FEES THAT WOULD BE PAID IN LIEU OF THE TREE PLANTING ARE COLLECTED BY THE TOWN, AND ULTIMATELY, THE TOWN COUNCIL HAS FINAL DISCRETION OF OVER WHERE THOSE TREES GO. THE TOWN HAS ALREADY COLLECTED A LARGE SUM FROM HILLWOOD AS THEY WERE UNABLE OR OR IT WASN'T IDEAL FOR THEM TO PLANT THE REQUIRED TREES ALONG 407 IN FRONT OF THE RESIDENTIAL SECTIONS, BECAUSE TEXDOT WILL COME IN THERE AND WIDEN FM 407. WHEN THAT IS COMPLETE, WE'LL HAVE AN AREA WHERE WE. WE CAN GO IN AND PLANT THE TREE. SO THEY PROVIDE THE FUNDING FOR THAT INTO THE FUTURE. SO SIMILARLY, FUNDS SUCH AS THIS COULD BE USED TO ENHANCE THE LANDSCAPING ALONG 407. ANOTHER THING I WANTED TO POINT OUT IS STAFF ALSO PRESENTED SOME CONCERNS ABOUT THE PARKING AND DRIVE THROUGH LAYOUT, THE MINIMUM PARKING AND DRIVE THROUGH REQUIREMENTS ARE MET WITH THIS SITE PLAN. THERE WERE SOME ALTERNATIVES THAT WERE EVALUATED, BUT ACCORDING TO THE DEVELOPER, DO NOT MEET STARBUCKS STANDARDS. THE. THE SITE PLAN, AS IT HAS BEEN PRESENTED, INCLUDES SOME MODIFICATIONS FROM WHAT THEY ORIGINALLY SHOWED TO HELP MITIGATE SOME OF THOSE TRAFFIC FLOW CONCERNS. SO ALTHOUGH THERE'S NOT A SPECIFIC STANDARD THAT'S NOT MEETING THE UDC DOES ESTABLISH CRITERIA FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL. AND ONE OF THESE IS THAT SITE PLAN DOES NOT GENERATE PEDESTRIAN OR VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, WHICH WILL BE HAZARDOUS OR CONFLICT WITH THE EXISTING TRAFFIC PATTERNS IN THE AREA. AND I WANT TO KIND OF POINT OUT SOME OF THE, THE ISSUES WE HAD WITH THIS ORIGINALLY, THIS WAS PROPOSED AS A TWO WAY DRIVE RIGHT NEXT TO THIS MAIN TWO WAY DRIVE. AS YOU ENTER THIS 407. AND THERE WAS CONCERNS ABOUT CONFLICTS RIGHT AFTER YOU TURN OFF OF 407. AND THEN PEOPLE ARE TRYING TO MAKE TURNING MOVEMENTS IN HERE OR MOVEMENTS OUT OF HERE. ALSO, THIS IS ANOTHER FOUR WAY INTERSECTION OF DRIVEWAYS. AND THEN YOU'RE ADDING KIND OF A FIFTH LEG TO IT HERE. SO THE THE APPLICANT DID GO BACK AND REDESIGN THIS TO MAKE IT SO THAT IT WAS CLEARLY MORE CLEARLY ONE WAY AND A LITTLE BIT MORE DIFFICULT FOR ANYBODY TO, TO ACCIDENTALLY GET IN HERE OR TRY TO SNEAK IN AND GET INTO THE, THE DRIVE THROUGH SO PEOPLE WOULDN'T DO SUCH A THING. RIGHT. BUT SO WE TRIED TO, TO DO OUR BEST TO MITIGATE SOME OF THOSE CONCERNS. THIS ONE WAY LAYOUT HELPS WITH THAT, BUT IT
[00:25:04]
STILL DOES HAVE THIS FIFTH LEG. THIS IS KIND OF AN AWKWARD MOVEMENT TO, TO GET OUT OF HERE AND BE IN A FOUR LANE INTERSECTION, IDEALLY. I'LL GET BACK THIS, THIS IS KIND OF A CONCEPT PLAN THAT WAS INCLUDED WITH THE PECAN PLAZA PRELIMINARY PLAT. THIS WASN'T THE FULL SITE PLAN, BUT THIS IS KIND OF WHAT THEY'RE DESIGNING THEIR PRELIMINARY PLAT BASED OFF OF. AND THIS WAS THE IDEA FOR THE STARBUCKS SITE WITH IT. SO IT HAD PARKING RIGHT OFF OF THE MAIN DRIVE. AND THE DRIVE THROUGH WAS A LOOP. INTERNALLY, IT WAS JUST THE DRIVE THROUGH LANE AND ACTUALLY PROVIDED MORE STACKING. THE ISSUE, ACCORDING TO THE DEVELOPER, IS THAT STARBUCKS DOESN'T WANT THEIR MOST CONVENIENT PARKING SPACES. HAVING TO CROSS A DRIVE THRU LANE. SO THAT'S WHY STARBUCKS WOULD NOT APPROVE THIS. SO THIS IS FOR YOUR CONSIDERATION TONIGHT TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION, A RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL, APPROVAL WITH CONDITIONS OR DISAPPROVAL OF THE SITE PLAN AS IT'S SUBMITTED. AND WITH THAT, YOU CAN YOU CAN CONSIDER THAT CONDITION THAT FUNDS IN LIEU OF THE TREE PLANTING BE REQUIRED FOR THOSE THREE TREES, WHICH WOULD BE A TOTAL OF NINE CALIPER INCHES THAT WOULD BE REQUIRED ALONG THAT FRONTAGE. I DO BELIEVE A REPRESENTATIVE FROM FOR THE PROJECT IS HERE, IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FOR THEM AS WELL. THANK YOU. NATHAN, DOES ANYBODY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS? SO HEY, I'LL START OUT BY SAYING I THINK THE CONSIDERATION FOR THE FUNDS IN LIEU OF THE TREE PLANTING IS AN ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATIVE. THE CVS, AND I THINK WE MADE SOME CONCESSIONS. AND COUNCIL, I BELIEVE, IS ON BOARD WITH THAT. WE SAW THE PREVIOUS ITEM. I. I REALLY STRUGGLE WITH THE TRAFFIC FLOW. NATHAN, IS THAT CONCRETE DRIVE? IS THAT A IS THAT A CITY? EXCUSE ME? IS THAT A TOWN OWNED ROAD OR IS THAT A PRIVATE ROAD? THIS IS PRIVATE.I'LL TELL YOU RIGHT NOW, I DON'T THINK THAT THIS IS GOING TO WORK AND WORK WELL. I THINK IT'S GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF CHALLENGES WITH TRAFFIC FLOW, A FIVE WAY INTERSECTION IN THAT I GUESS IT WOULD BE SOUTHWEST CORNER IS HORRIBLE. THERE'S NO WAY PEOPLE ARE GOING TO STOP AT A DO NOT ENTER STOP BAR TO TRY TO GET IN THERE AND ORDER THEIR LATTES. HIS FIRE LOOKED AT THIS.
DO YOU KNOW NATHAN IS IS IS IS TAKING A LOOK AT THIS FROM A STANDPOINT OF THE FIRE MARSHAL.
YES. I BELIEVE THEY HAVE FOR IT WORKS FOR FIRE LANE ACCESS THAT. SO ON THE EAST SIDE OF THIS BUILDING, THERE'S ENOUGH. THERE'S. IS THERE ANOTHER PRIVATE DRIVE ON THE EAST SIDE? I CAN'T RECALL, I DON'T REMEMBER WHAT THE SITE PLAN SHOWED. YES, THERE IS PART OF CVS DEVELOPMENT. I THINK THAT THERE'S A CHALLENGE WITH THE PICKUP TRUCK TRYING TO MAKE THAT TURN AND NOT CLIP THAT DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE WITH A SOLID BLOCK WALL ABOUT EIGHT FEET TALL, AND TRY NOT TO HIT THAT MENU ORDERING BOARD. THERE'S THERE'S SOME PRETTY SIGNIFICANT CHALLENGES, I BELIEVE, WITH THIS SITE PLAN. I WOULD ALSO BE CURIOUS TO KNOW WHAT WERE THE CHANGES AFTER THE STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS WAS JUST THE DO NOT ENTER TEXT ON THE ROAD OR PARKING LOT, MAKING THIS A ONE WAY DRIVE LANE ANGLED PARKING TO MAKE THAT CLEAR AS WELL. AND RECONFIGURATION OF THIS ONE WAY EXIT AND MORE CLEARLY SHOWING THAT IT WAS ONE WAY, DO NOT ENTER. OKAY, IS IT IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE? NO. THAT WAS A THAT WAS A. AND NATHAN, JUST FOR MY UNDERSTANDING. SO IT MEETS ALL THE OTHER REQUIREMENTS OTHER THAN THE LANDSCAPE WHICH WE PREVIOUSLY DISCUSSED. CORRECT? CORRECT. CORRECT. OKAY. WE HAVE ANY FURTHER DISCUSSION. I GUESS MY ONLY OTHER QUESTION WHETHER WHAT OTHER OPTION WOULD THERE BE FOR THAT EXIT RIGHT THERE. SO ONE OPTION WOULD BE TO, TO CLOSE THAT OFF. BUT. THEN AND THIS TWO WAY AGAIN. BUT THEN YOU GOT MORE ISSUES HERE. SO WE, WE LOOKED AT RECOMMENDED
[00:30:04]
TO SEE IF WE COULD GET TWO LANES. SO YOU GET AN EXIT LANE THAT CAN COME ALL THE WAY BACK AROUND OUT HERE. BUT. THERE JUST WASN'T THE ROOM THAT THE SITE IS PRETTY TIGHT. IT IS CHALLENGING. AND I THINK WE FELT LIKE MAYBE THE BEST OPTION WAS LIKE I SHOWED ON THE PRELIMINARY PLAT WITH THIS, THE THE DRIVE THROUGH LANE ALL THE WAY AROUND THE BUILDING. BUT YOU WOULD HAVE TO CROSS THAT, THAT WITH THE MOST CONVENIENT PARKING, WHICH I DO UNDERSTAND STARBUCKS CONCERNS. AND ACCORDING TO THE DEVELOPER WHO BUILDS THESE FOR STARBUCKS, THAT WOULD JUST KILL THE DEAL IS, IS WHAT THEY TOLD US. WOW. BUT THERE'S NOT ENOUGH ROOM ON THE ACTUAL PLOT TO DO THAT. SECOND EXIT LANE AROUND, WRAP AROUND, DRIVE THROUGH. OKAY.NATHAN, YOU MENTIONED A SECOND AGO THAT THERE'S A REQUIREMENT FOR SEVEN Q SEVEN CARS IN THE IN THE STACKING QUEUE. YES. WHERE DOES THAT COME FROM? THAT'S THAT'S IN OUR UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE. YEAH, I KNEW THAT. I JUST FORGOT THAT SECTION. WHAT ARE OUR BUILDING SETBACK LINES IN A SITE LIKE THIS. THEY THEY WILL EXCEED IT. I DON'T REMEMBER OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. AND THIS IS IN A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT. IT MAY VARY FROM OUR STANDARD. AND AND IT'S GOT IT'S GOT EXISTING DRIVEWAYS ALL THE WAY AROUND. SO IT KIND OF ANYWHERE YOU COULD PUT THAT BUILDING WOULD MEET THE SETBACKS. ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE ANY MORE DISCUSSION.
IF NOT DO I HAVE ANY MOTIONS. I MAKE A MOTION TO DENY. ANY SECONDS. SECOND. OKAY. WITH YOUR MOTION WOULD YOU PROVIDE SOME GUIDANCE ON ON WHY YOU'RE WANTING TO, NOT WHAT YOU'RE WANTING TO SEE? WHAT WOULD. YEAH, I'LL, I'LL DO THAT. CAN I, CAN I AMEND MY MOTION? OKAY. I MAKE A MOTION TO DENY AND HAVE THE PROPOSED ARCHITECT DEVELOPER SITE DESIGNER REWORK THAT DRIVE THROUGH AND POSSIBLE FIVE WAY INTERSECTION TO BE A LITTLE MORE CONDUCIVE TO THE TRAFFIC FLOW. WITH THE EXISTING ROADS THAT ARE ALREADY BUILT OR GOING TO BE BUILT. MAYBE TAKE ANOTHER STAB AT THIS SITE PLAN AND BRING IT BACK TO US. SO YEAH, SO IT'S YOU'RE BASING ON THAT CRITERIA ABOUT. MAKING VEHICULAR TRAFFIC HAZARDOUS OR CONFLICTING WITH EXISTING TRAFFIC PATTERNS. THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT I WAS TRYING TO SAY. NATHAN, THANK YOU FOR THAT SUMMARY. DID YOU GET THAT? YES, I'M MODIFYING IT. THAT. MAY I STEP UP? I'M MAINLY CURIOUS. I MEAN, ARE THERE REALLY ANY OTHER AVAILABLE OPTIONS IF WE CAN'T DO THE LOOP ROUND AND WE CAN'T DO THE OTHER REDESIGN, THAT'S NOT UP TO THE STANDARDS OF THE BUILDER. WELL, FIRST LET ME INTRODUCE MYSELF. I'M MICKEY THOMAS, I'M WITH FORSYTH GROUP IN FORT WORTH WITH CIVIL ENGINEERS ON THE PROJECT. AND THIS THIS IS A VERY TIGHT SITE. AND ONE OF THE THINGS STARBUCKS HAS IS THEY THEY DON'T WANT PEDESTRIANS CROSSING THE DRIVE THROUGH FACILITY. OKAY. GO BACK TO THE STACKING REQUIREMENT. THEY REQUIRE MINIMUM OF 7 OR 120FT FROM THE ORDER POINT, BACK TO BACK TO THE BACK TO THE WINDOW. WE'VE GOT ADDITIONAL ROOM WITH THE WAY THE SITE PLANS LAID OUT TO ALLOW PEOPLE TO STACK HERE VERSUS IN THE PRIVATE DRIVEWAY, WHICH IS ONE OF THE REASONS WHY WE DO THAT, BECAUSE STARBUCKS JUST HISTORICALLY IS GOING TO HAVE A LOT OF CARS COME INTO IT. SO WE WANT TO TRY AND BE ABLE TO GET THEM THERE VERSUS HAVING THEM STACK ON THE PRIVATE DRIVEWAY BECAUSE IT'S JUST GOING TO CLOG UP THE DRIVEWAY ALL THE WAY UP THE MAIN AISLE RIGHT THERE. SO WHEN TALKING WITH STARBUCKS ON THIS, THIS IS KIND OF ONE OF THOSE THINGS THAT THAT IS PRETTY MUCH A DEAL KILLER. IF WE HAD TO SHOVE THE BUILDING ALL THE WAY BACK OVER THERE AND PUSH THE DRIVE THROUGH OUT ON THAT MAIN DRIVE, IT WOULD JUST IT REALLY, IT JUST BE A NIGHTMARE FOR EVERYBODY. I THINK THAT'S THE REASON WHY IT WAS DONE THAT WAY. WE DID TALK WITH STAFF. WE DID COME BACK IN, WE LOOKED AT THE TWO WAY TRAFFIC, DECIDED TO PUT IT IN ONE WAY, NARROWED DOWN THAT EGRESS ON THAT SOUTH END WHERE THEY COULD. THEY HAD TO GO OUT ONE WAY AND THAT WAS IT. THAT WAS ONE OF THE CONCESSIONS. WE
[00:35:05]
TALKED WITH THE CITY STAFF ON IT AND THE PREDEVELOPMENT MEETING. WHEN WE SAT IN THERE, THEY SAID IT WAS RECOMMENDED. THEY WERE LIKE, HEY, YOU KNOW, WE'D LIKE TO SEE THIS. I SAID, IS THAT A REQUIREMENT? NO. WE PROGRESSED WITH DESIGN AND THIS IS WHERE WE'RE AT TODAY. AND THIS CAME OUT DURING THE SITE PLAN REVIEW. SO DID I ANSWER YOUR QUESTION, SIR? YOU DID TO HOW WE GOT HERE. BUT I'M JUST CURIOUS, ARE THERE ANY OTHER OPTIONS AT THIS POINT ON, ON THIS ONE I DON'T I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU'RE GOING TO DO IT. IT'S JUST A TIGHT SITE. THERE'S WE'D LOVE TO PUT A BYPASS LANE. THAT'S ONE OF THE THINGS WE TYPICALLY DO ON MOST OF THE STARBUCKS SITES, UNLESS WE JUST DON'T HAVE THE ROOM. BEING THAT WE DIDN'T WANT TO TRY AND GET THE STACKING BACK OUT INTO THE DRIVE OUT, INTO THE MAIN DRIVE OUT THERE, IT HAD TO GO AHEAD AND PUSH IT IN. THUS NO BYPASS ON IT. AND IT'S JUST THERE'S REALLY NOT A GOOD A BETTER WAY TO DO IT. I MEAN, YOU TRY AND FLIP THE BUILDING AROUND, BUT THEN YOU IT'S JUST NOT GOING TO WORK EITHER. SO. MICKEY. YES, SIR. SO I SEE A BUNCH OF GRAVEL AREA AT THE TOP OF THIS ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S A EXTERIOR PATIO. THAT'S AN EXTERIOR PATIO.YES, SIR. SO, YOU KNOW, I DON'T KNOW. IT'S 105 DEGREES OUTSIDE. AND I DON'T KNOW HOW MANY PEOPLE ARE UTILIZING THAT RIGHT NOW, BUT. IF THE BUILDING WERE TO MOVE TO THE NORTH, I DON'T KNOW, 20FT, THEN MAYBE YOU HAVE A LITTLE MORE ROOM TO WORK WITH DOWN THERE WITH THAT. Q AND THAT DRIVE THROUGH, MAYBE THAT DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, OR MAYBE YOU ROTATE THE BUILDING 90 DEGREES. WE LOOKED AT THIS, WE TWISTED AND TURNED THIS THING MANY DIFFERENT WAYS. AND ONE OF THE THAT OUTDOOR PATIO DINING PATIO THAT STARBUCKS HAS IS PART OF THEIR PROTOTYPE. IT'S JUST PART OF THEIR BUILDING FUNCTION. THAT'S HOW THEY OPERATE THE BUSINESS. SO THAT WOULD BE TRYING TO RECONFIGURE THE THE PATIO AND IT WOULD BE. MICKEY. EXTREMELY DIFFICULT.
MICKEY. I THINK THAT INTERSECTION WITH THAT ONE WAY EXIT IS JUST A RECIPE FOR DISASTER. IF YOU'VE NAVIGATED THIS AREA HERE WITH THESE 24 FOOT FIRE LANES, IT IS HORRIBLE WITH THOSE GROCERY STORES DOWN HERE AT THE END, YOU'RE DODGING CARS LIKE FROGGER, LIKE YOU WOULDN'T BELIEVE IN THE TRAFFIC YOU'RE GOING TO BRING IN WITH STARBUCKS IS GOING TO IS, IS, IS, IS HORRIBLE. FIRE AND POLICE ARE GOING TO BE HERE WITH FENDER BENDERS ALL THE TIME. I THINK IT'S GOING TO BE, IT'S GOING TO BE TOUGH ON EVERYBODY. I THINK THERE'S SOMETHING THAT CAN BE DONE TO HELP WORK ON THAT. I DON'T KNOW THAT YOU HEY, YOU'RE A CIVIL ENGINEER, RIGHT? YES, SIR. ALRIGHT. I, I KNOW THAT YOU KNOW ABOUT PERPENDICULAR INTERSECTIONS AND, AND CREATING A, A A, ANOTHER ACCESS POINT LIKE THAT IS TABOO. IT'S NOT OPTIMAL. IT IS NOT OPTIMAL. THOSE AREN'T MY WORDS. ARE THERE ANY SIMILAR, SPECIFICALLY STARBUCKS THAT YOU HAVE LOOKED AT THAT ARE KIND OF SET UP LIKE THIS? AND HAVE THERE BEEN WE HAVE WE HAVE OTHERS THAT HAVE COME IN WITH DRIVES THAT ARE ADJACENT IN THIS LOCATION, JUST NOT QUITE AS WIDE ON THE CORNER. LIKE THIS ONE IS, YOU KNOW, TYPICALLY THEY COME UP AROUND THE CORNER JUST A SMIDGEN FOR THE DRIVE TO COME IN, BUT NOT EXACTLY LIKE THIS. NO. OKAY.
THANK YOU SIR. FIXES MORE LAND. YEAH. I GUESS IF IT WENT FURTHER BACK OVER TOWARDS THE CVS PHARMACY RIGHT THERE, PROBABLY HAVE A LITTLE BIT LITTLE ADDITIONAL LAND TO MAKE THAT WORK. BUT MICKEY, WHO OWNS THAT PIECE OF PROPERTY TO THE WEST OF THIS THIS RIGHT HERE, I DON'T KNOW THE STARBUCKS OWN THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY. I DON'T KNOW OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD RIGHT NOW. THAT'S A DEVELOPER ON THAT. ONE. NO, HE'S NOT HERE TODAY. TROPICAL. THANK YOU.
THANK YOU. NATHAN, CAN I ASK WHAT ARE OUR OPTIONS HERE AT THIS POINT? SO I THINK YOU NEED TO TAKE A VOTE ON THE MOTION THAT'S ON THE TABLE. OKAY. SEE WHAT HAPPENS WITH THAT. ALRIGHT.
SO SO NATHAN, THE MOTION IS TO DENY. SO WE VOTE YES TO DENY OR NO TO DENY. CORRECT. WITH THE STIPULATION OF MODIFYING IT FOR TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ACCORDING TO THE UDC. CORRECT.
[00:40:02]
DENY WITH CONDITIONS. AND THEN WHAT? IF YOU WANT TO CONTINUE DISCUSSION. NO. YES. KILLS IT.NO. WE CAN TALK ABOUT SOMETHING THAT'S CORRECT. AND I, I WILL MENTION THAT YOUR NEXT PNC MEETING WILL BE THE SAME WEEK AS THAT NEXT TOWN COUNCIL MEETING. THIS WAS SCHEDULED TO GO TO. SO THERE IS AN OPPORTUNITY TO KIND OF HAVE ONE LAST LOOK AT IT RIGHT BEFORE IT GOES TO COUNCIL. IS THERE A REASON WHY THIS IS BEING RUSHED, NATHAN? IT'S NOT BEING RUSHED.
IT WAS IT WAS READY TO GO. WE WANTED TO GET YOUR INPUT ON IT, KNOWING THERE WERE SOME CONCERNS WITH IT. AND THEN IF IF YOU AGREED WITH THOSE CONCERNS, THEN GIVE US SOME TIME TO TO WORK WITH THE APPLICANT TO, TO BRING IT BACK AGAIN. I THINK THAT THERE'S SOME CHALLENGES IN THAT. IT NEEDS SOME MORE PEN TO PAPER TO MOVE FORWARD. SO JUST TO CLARIFY. SO IF WE WANT TO SEE IT AGAIN, WE SHOULD VOTE NO. BECAUSE VOTING YES WOULD KILL THIS AND SAY IT'S OVER. OKAY. SO WHY IS THAT? IF YOU IF YOU VOTE YES, YOU DENY KILLS IT, THEN WE CAN READ THIS. WE CAN DISCUSS IT AGAIN. NOW WE'RE CONFUSED. YES, YOU CAN GO TO THE NINE AND DISCUSS IT AGAIN HERE. OR THEN YOU CAN JUST GO. VOTE TO DENY IT. RIGHT. YES.
YEAH. WHAT HAPPENED IS THEY JUST BRING IT BACK TO THE NEXT MEETING, POTENTIALLY WITH SOME CHANGES, BECAUSE THERE'S NOTHING TO BE DENIED THEN. NOTHING TO DISCUSS HER. THE CHANGE THAT THEY CAN PRESENT AT THIS MOMENT. SO YOU DON'T HAVE TO WAIT FOR WHENEVER THEY PROVIDE NEW INFORMATION. I'M SORRY. SO IF YOU'RE. JUST SPEAKING UP, DO YOU WANT TO STOP IT? YES. STOP IT. RIGHT. IF YOU VOTE TO DENY. RIGHT, THE MOTION ON THE TABLE IS TO DENY WITH CONDITIONS TO MEET WHATEVER PROVISIONS OF THE UDC CODE. OKAY. IF YOU VOTE TO DENY THAT YOU WOULD VOTE YES TO DENY. AND THEN THE PROVISION IS TO, I GUESS, STAFF TO WORK WITH THE THE APPLICANT TO BRING THAT BACK FOR REVIEW AT A FUTURE TIME. DOES THAT MAKE SENSE? YES.
OKAY. NO. ALL RIGHT. THE VOTE TO DENY PASSES. ALL RIGHT. AT THIS TIME WE HAVE NO FURTHER
[4.D. VOTE]
ITEMS. SO WE WILL ADJOURN* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.